Cargando…

New avenues of sepsis research: obtaining perspective by analyzing and comparing SSCG 2021 and J-SSCG 2020

Recently, revisions of two sepsis guidelines, namely, the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2021, were published. Although both guidelines were created in accordance with the Grading of Recommendations, A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yatabe, Tomoaki, Egi, Moritoki, Ogura, Hiroshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8900396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35255989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-022-00606-7
_version_ 1784664103903559680
author Yatabe, Tomoaki
Egi, Moritoki
Ogura, Hiroshi
author_facet Yatabe, Tomoaki
Egi, Moritoki
Ogura, Hiroshi
author_sort Yatabe, Tomoaki
collection PubMed
description Recently, revisions of two sepsis guidelines, namely, the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2021, were published. Although both guidelines were created in accordance with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, the evidence-to-decision tables differed between them. In addition, certain recommendations may differ between these guidelines for similar clinical questions because of differences in the “PICO” criteria. Other differences in recommendations between the two guidelines are due to unclear evidence, and these ambiguities may provide the basis for further sepsis research. We hope that these two guidelines will contribute to the creation of new clinical evidence in addition to supporting treatment of patients with sepsis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8900396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89003962022-03-17 New avenues of sepsis research: obtaining perspective by analyzing and comparing SSCG 2021 and J-SSCG 2020 Yatabe, Tomoaki Egi, Moritoki Ogura, Hiroshi J Intensive Care Commentary Recently, revisions of two sepsis guidelines, namely, the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2021, were published. Although both guidelines were created in accordance with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, the evidence-to-decision tables differed between them. In addition, certain recommendations may differ between these guidelines for similar clinical questions because of differences in the “PICO” criteria. Other differences in recommendations between the two guidelines are due to unclear evidence, and these ambiguities may provide the basis for further sepsis research. We hope that these two guidelines will contribute to the creation of new clinical evidence in addition to supporting treatment of patients with sepsis. BioMed Central 2022-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8900396/ /pubmed/35255989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-022-00606-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Commentary
Yatabe, Tomoaki
Egi, Moritoki
Ogura, Hiroshi
New avenues of sepsis research: obtaining perspective by analyzing and comparing SSCG 2021 and J-SSCG 2020
title New avenues of sepsis research: obtaining perspective by analyzing and comparing SSCG 2021 and J-SSCG 2020
title_full New avenues of sepsis research: obtaining perspective by analyzing and comparing SSCG 2021 and J-SSCG 2020
title_fullStr New avenues of sepsis research: obtaining perspective by analyzing and comparing SSCG 2021 and J-SSCG 2020
title_full_unstemmed New avenues of sepsis research: obtaining perspective by analyzing and comparing SSCG 2021 and J-SSCG 2020
title_short New avenues of sepsis research: obtaining perspective by analyzing and comparing SSCG 2021 and J-SSCG 2020
title_sort new avenues of sepsis research: obtaining perspective by analyzing and comparing sscg 2021 and j-sscg 2020
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8900396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35255989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-022-00606-7
work_keys_str_mv AT yatabetomoaki newavenuesofsepsisresearchobtainingperspectivebyanalyzingandcomparingsscg2021andjsscg2020
AT egimoritoki newavenuesofsepsisresearchobtainingperspectivebyanalyzingandcomparingsscg2021andjsscg2020
AT ogurahiroshi newavenuesofsepsisresearchobtainingperspectivebyanalyzingandcomparingsscg2021andjsscg2020