Cargando…
New avenues of sepsis research: obtaining perspective by analyzing and comparing SSCG 2021 and J-SSCG 2020
Recently, revisions of two sepsis guidelines, namely, the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2021, were published. Although both guidelines were created in accordance with the Grading of Recommendations, A...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8900396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35255989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-022-00606-7 |
_version_ | 1784664103903559680 |
---|---|
author | Yatabe, Tomoaki Egi, Moritoki Ogura, Hiroshi |
author_facet | Yatabe, Tomoaki Egi, Moritoki Ogura, Hiroshi |
author_sort | Yatabe, Tomoaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recently, revisions of two sepsis guidelines, namely, the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2021, were published. Although both guidelines were created in accordance with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, the evidence-to-decision tables differed between them. In addition, certain recommendations may differ between these guidelines for similar clinical questions because of differences in the “PICO” criteria. Other differences in recommendations between the two guidelines are due to unclear evidence, and these ambiguities may provide the basis for further sepsis research. We hope that these two guidelines will contribute to the creation of new clinical evidence in addition to supporting treatment of patients with sepsis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8900396 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89003962022-03-17 New avenues of sepsis research: obtaining perspective by analyzing and comparing SSCG 2021 and J-SSCG 2020 Yatabe, Tomoaki Egi, Moritoki Ogura, Hiroshi J Intensive Care Commentary Recently, revisions of two sepsis guidelines, namely, the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2021, were published. Although both guidelines were created in accordance with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, the evidence-to-decision tables differed between them. In addition, certain recommendations may differ between these guidelines for similar clinical questions because of differences in the “PICO” criteria. Other differences in recommendations between the two guidelines are due to unclear evidence, and these ambiguities may provide the basis for further sepsis research. We hope that these two guidelines will contribute to the creation of new clinical evidence in addition to supporting treatment of patients with sepsis. BioMed Central 2022-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8900396/ /pubmed/35255989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-022-00606-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Yatabe, Tomoaki Egi, Moritoki Ogura, Hiroshi New avenues of sepsis research: obtaining perspective by analyzing and comparing SSCG 2021 and J-SSCG 2020 |
title | New avenues of sepsis research: obtaining perspective by analyzing and comparing SSCG 2021 and J-SSCG 2020 |
title_full | New avenues of sepsis research: obtaining perspective by analyzing and comparing SSCG 2021 and J-SSCG 2020 |
title_fullStr | New avenues of sepsis research: obtaining perspective by analyzing and comparing SSCG 2021 and J-SSCG 2020 |
title_full_unstemmed | New avenues of sepsis research: obtaining perspective by analyzing and comparing SSCG 2021 and J-SSCG 2020 |
title_short | New avenues of sepsis research: obtaining perspective by analyzing and comparing SSCG 2021 and J-SSCG 2020 |
title_sort | new avenues of sepsis research: obtaining perspective by analyzing and comparing sscg 2021 and j-sscg 2020 |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8900396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35255989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-022-00606-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yatabetomoaki newavenuesofsepsisresearchobtainingperspectivebyanalyzingandcomparingsscg2021andjsscg2020 AT egimoritoki newavenuesofsepsisresearchobtainingperspectivebyanalyzingandcomparingsscg2021andjsscg2020 AT ogurahiroshi newavenuesofsepsisresearchobtainingperspectivebyanalyzingandcomparingsscg2021andjsscg2020 |