Cargando…

Anatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for depression may vary depending on the subregion stimulated within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Clinical TMS typically uses scalp-based landmarks for DLPFC targeting, rather than individualized MRI guida...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cardenas, V.A., Bhat, J.V., Horwege, A.M., Ehrlich, T.J., Lavacot, J., Mathalon, D.H., Glover, G.H., Roach, B.J., Badran, B.W., Forman, S.D., George, M.S., Thase, M.E., Yesavage, J.A., Yurgelun-Todd, D., Rosen, A.C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8900427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34767967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2021.11.008
_version_ 1784664111933554688
author Cardenas, V.A.
Bhat, J.V.
Horwege, A.M.
Ehrlich, T.J.
Lavacot, J.
Mathalon, D.H.
Glover, G.H.
Roach, B.J.
Badran, B.W.
Forman, S.D.
George, M.S.
Thase, M.E.
Yesavage, J.A.
Yurgelun-Todd, D.
Rosen, A.C.
author_facet Cardenas, V.A.
Bhat, J.V.
Horwege, A.M.
Ehrlich, T.J.
Lavacot, J.
Mathalon, D.H.
Glover, G.H.
Roach, B.J.
Badran, B.W.
Forman, S.D.
George, M.S.
Thase, M.E.
Yesavage, J.A.
Yurgelun-Todd, D.
Rosen, A.C.
author_sort Cardenas, V.A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for depression may vary depending on the subregion stimulated within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Clinical TMS typically uses scalp-based landmarks for DLPFC targeting, rather than individualized MRI guidance. OBJECTIVE: In rTMS patients, determine the brain systems targeted by multiple DLPFC stimulation rules by computing several surrogate measures: underlying brain targets labeled with connectivity-based atlases, subgenual cingulate anticorrelation strength, and functionally connected networks. METHODS: Forty-nine patients in a randomized controlled trial of rTMS therapy for treatment resistant major depression underwent structural and functional MRI. DLPFC rules were applied virtually using MR-image guidance. Underlying cortical regions were labeled, and connectivity with the subgenual cingulate and whole-brain computed. RESULTS: Scalp-targeting rules applied post hoc to these MRIs that adjusted for head size, including Beam F3, were comparably precise, successful in directly targeting classical DLPFC and frontal networks, and anticorrelated with the subgenual cingulate. In contrast, all rules involving fixed distances introduced variability in regions and networks targeted. The 5 cm rule targeted a transitional DLPFC region with a different connectivity profile from the adjusted rules. Seed-based connectivity analyses identified multiple regions, such as posterior cingulate and inferior parietal lobe, that warrant further study in order to understand their potential contribution to clinical response. CONCLUSION: EEG-based rules consistently targeted DLPFC brain regions with resting-state fMRI features known to be associated with depression response. These results provide a bridge from lab to clinic by enabling clinicians to relate scalp-targeting rules to functionally connected brain systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8900427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89004272022-03-07 Anatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression Cardenas, V.A. Bhat, J.V. Horwege, A.M. Ehrlich, T.J. Lavacot, J. Mathalon, D.H. Glover, G.H. Roach, B.J. Badran, B.W. Forman, S.D. George, M.S. Thase, M.E. Yesavage, J.A. Yurgelun-Todd, D. Rosen, A.C. Brain Stimul Article BACKGROUND: The efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for depression may vary depending on the subregion stimulated within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Clinical TMS typically uses scalp-based landmarks for DLPFC targeting, rather than individualized MRI guidance. OBJECTIVE: In rTMS patients, determine the brain systems targeted by multiple DLPFC stimulation rules by computing several surrogate measures: underlying brain targets labeled with connectivity-based atlases, subgenual cingulate anticorrelation strength, and functionally connected networks. METHODS: Forty-nine patients in a randomized controlled trial of rTMS therapy for treatment resistant major depression underwent structural and functional MRI. DLPFC rules were applied virtually using MR-image guidance. Underlying cortical regions were labeled, and connectivity with the subgenual cingulate and whole-brain computed. RESULTS: Scalp-targeting rules applied post hoc to these MRIs that adjusted for head size, including Beam F3, were comparably precise, successful in directly targeting classical DLPFC and frontal networks, and anticorrelated with the subgenual cingulate. In contrast, all rules involving fixed distances introduced variability in regions and networks targeted. The 5 cm rule targeted a transitional DLPFC region with a different connectivity profile from the adjusted rules. Seed-based connectivity analyses identified multiple regions, such as posterior cingulate and inferior parietal lobe, that warrant further study in order to understand their potential contribution to clinical response. CONCLUSION: EEG-based rules consistently targeted DLPFC brain regions with resting-state fMRI features known to be associated with depression response. These results provide a bridge from lab to clinic by enabling clinicians to relate scalp-targeting rules to functionally connected brain systems. 2022 2021-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8900427/ /pubmed/34767967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2021.11.008 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Cardenas, V.A.
Bhat, J.V.
Horwege, A.M.
Ehrlich, T.J.
Lavacot, J.
Mathalon, D.H.
Glover, G.H.
Roach, B.J.
Badran, B.W.
Forman, S.D.
George, M.S.
Thase, M.E.
Yesavage, J.A.
Yurgelun-Todd, D.
Rosen, A.C.
Anatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression
title Anatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression
title_full Anatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression
title_fullStr Anatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression
title_full_unstemmed Anatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression
title_short Anatomical and fMRI-network comparison of multiple DLPFC targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression
title_sort anatomical and fmri-network comparison of multiple dlpfc targeting strategies for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of depression
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8900427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34767967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2021.11.008
work_keys_str_mv AT cardenasva anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT bhatjv anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT horwegeam anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT ehrlichtj anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT lavacotj anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT mathalondh anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT glovergh anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT roachbj anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT badranbw anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT formansd anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT georgems anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT thaseme anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT yesavageja anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT yurgeluntoddd anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression
AT rosenac anatomicalandfmrinetworkcomparisonofmultipledlpfctargetingstrategiesforrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationtreatmentofdepression