Cargando…

X-ray microtomography imaging of craniofacial hard tissues in selected reptile species with different types of dentition

BACKGROUND: Reptiles exhibit a large heterogeneity in teeth morphology. The main variability comprises the different tooth shape, the type of tooth attachment to the underlying bone, or the ability to replace the teeth. FINDINGS: Here, we provide full datasets of microtomography scans and 3D models...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kavková, Michaela, Šulcová, Marie, Zikmund, Tomáš, Pyszko, Martin, Kaiser, Jozef, Buchtová, Marcela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8900495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35254425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giac016
_version_ 1784664126417534976
author Kavková, Michaela
Šulcová, Marie
Zikmund, Tomáš
Pyszko, Martin
Kaiser, Jozef
Buchtová, Marcela
author_facet Kavková, Michaela
Šulcová, Marie
Zikmund, Tomáš
Pyszko, Martin
Kaiser, Jozef
Buchtová, Marcela
author_sort Kavková, Michaela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reptiles exhibit a large heterogeneity in teeth morphology. The main variability comprises the different tooth shape, the type of tooth attachment to the underlying bone, or the ability to replace the teeth. FINDINGS: Here, we provide full datasets of microtomography scans and 3D models of reptilian dentitions and skulls. We selected representative species for each of 9 reptilian families on the basis of their characteristic dental features. Because there are ≥4 different types of tooth-bone attachments, ranging from the mammalian-like thecodont attachment found in crocodilians to the simple acrodont implantation observed in some lizards, we aimed to evaluate species with different types of tooth-bone attachments. Moreover, another interesting feature varying in reptilian species is the complexity of tooth shape or the number of tooth generations, which can be associated with the type of tooth attachment to the jawbone. Therefore, selected model species also include animals with distinct tooth morphology along the jaw or different number of tooth generations. The development of tooth attachment and relationship of the tooth to the jaw can be further analysed in detail on a large collection of pre-hatching stages of chameleon. Next, we introduce different possibilities for how these datasets can be further used to study tooth-bone relationships or tooth morphology in 3D space. Moreover, these datasets can be valuable for additional morphological and morphometric analyses of reptilian skulls or their individually segmented skeletal elements. CONCLUSIONS: Our collection of microcomputed tomography scans can bring new insight into dental or skeletal research. The broad selection of reptilian species, together with their unique dental features and high quality of these scans including complete series of developmental stages of our model species and provide large opportunities for their reuse. Scans can be further used for virtual reality, 3D printing, or in education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8900495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89004952022-03-08 X-ray microtomography imaging of craniofacial hard tissues in selected reptile species with different types of dentition Kavková, Michaela Šulcová, Marie Zikmund, Tomáš Pyszko, Martin Kaiser, Jozef Buchtová, Marcela Gigascience Data Note BACKGROUND: Reptiles exhibit a large heterogeneity in teeth morphology. The main variability comprises the different tooth shape, the type of tooth attachment to the underlying bone, or the ability to replace the teeth. FINDINGS: Here, we provide full datasets of microtomography scans and 3D models of reptilian dentitions and skulls. We selected representative species for each of 9 reptilian families on the basis of their characteristic dental features. Because there are ≥4 different types of tooth-bone attachments, ranging from the mammalian-like thecodont attachment found in crocodilians to the simple acrodont implantation observed in some lizards, we aimed to evaluate species with different types of tooth-bone attachments. Moreover, another interesting feature varying in reptilian species is the complexity of tooth shape or the number of tooth generations, which can be associated with the type of tooth attachment to the jawbone. Therefore, selected model species also include animals with distinct tooth morphology along the jaw or different number of tooth generations. The development of tooth attachment and relationship of the tooth to the jaw can be further analysed in detail on a large collection of pre-hatching stages of chameleon. Next, we introduce different possibilities for how these datasets can be further used to study tooth-bone relationships or tooth morphology in 3D space. Moreover, these datasets can be valuable for additional morphological and morphometric analyses of reptilian skulls or their individually segmented skeletal elements. CONCLUSIONS: Our collection of microcomputed tomography scans can bring new insight into dental or skeletal research. The broad selection of reptilian species, together with their unique dental features and high quality of these scans including complete series of developmental stages of our model species and provide large opportunities for their reuse. Scans can be further used for virtual reality, 3D printing, or in education. Oxford University Press 2022-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8900495/ /pubmed/35254425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giac016 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press GigaScience. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Data Note
Kavková, Michaela
Šulcová, Marie
Zikmund, Tomáš
Pyszko, Martin
Kaiser, Jozef
Buchtová, Marcela
X-ray microtomography imaging of craniofacial hard tissues in selected reptile species with different types of dentition
title X-ray microtomography imaging of craniofacial hard tissues in selected reptile species with different types of dentition
title_full X-ray microtomography imaging of craniofacial hard tissues in selected reptile species with different types of dentition
title_fullStr X-ray microtomography imaging of craniofacial hard tissues in selected reptile species with different types of dentition
title_full_unstemmed X-ray microtomography imaging of craniofacial hard tissues in selected reptile species with different types of dentition
title_short X-ray microtomography imaging of craniofacial hard tissues in selected reptile species with different types of dentition
title_sort x-ray microtomography imaging of craniofacial hard tissues in selected reptile species with different types of dentition
topic Data Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8900495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35254425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giac016
work_keys_str_mv AT kavkovamichaela xraymicrotomographyimagingofcraniofacialhardtissuesinselectedreptilespecieswithdifferenttypesofdentition
AT sulcovamarie xraymicrotomographyimagingofcraniofacialhardtissuesinselectedreptilespecieswithdifferenttypesofdentition
AT zikmundtomas xraymicrotomographyimagingofcraniofacialhardtissuesinselectedreptilespecieswithdifferenttypesofdentition
AT pyszkomartin xraymicrotomographyimagingofcraniofacialhardtissuesinselectedreptilespecieswithdifferenttypesofdentition
AT kaiserjozef xraymicrotomographyimagingofcraniofacialhardtissuesinselectedreptilespecieswithdifferenttypesofdentition
AT buchtovamarcela xraymicrotomographyimagingofcraniofacialhardtissuesinselectedreptilespecieswithdifferenttypesofdentition