Cargando…
Comparing bowel lengthening procedures: which, when, and why?
Intestinal failure secondary to short bowel syndrome is still a very serious condition. Treatment consists of parenteral nutrition to provide nutrients and maintain body weight. During the last decades, intestinal lengthening procedures have become more available. The goal of this review is to discu...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8900888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35143433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000000957 |
_version_ | 1784664226145501184 |
---|---|
author | van Praagh, Jasper B. Hofker, H. Sijbrand Haveman, Jan-Willem |
author_facet | van Praagh, Jasper B. Hofker, H. Sijbrand Haveman, Jan-Willem |
author_sort | van Praagh, Jasper B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Intestinal failure secondary to short bowel syndrome is still a very serious condition. Treatment consists of parenteral nutrition to provide nutrients and maintain body weight. During the last decades, intestinal lengthening procedures have become more available. The goal of this review is to discuss the results of the literature on the most commonly performed intestinal lengthening procedures. RECENT FINDINGS: Longitudinal Intestinal Lengthening, Serial Transverse Enteroplasty (STEP), and Spiral Intestinal Lengthening and Tailoring (SILT) are currently the most frequently reported intestinal lengthening procedures. The most recent literature of these procedures is described with respect to indication, technical details, complications, short and long-term outcome, and PN independence. SUMMARY: On the basis of indication, surgical complexity, complications, and clinical success, we conclude that the STEP procedure is probably the best choice for most centers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8900888 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89008882022-03-07 Comparing bowel lengthening procedures: which, when, and why? van Praagh, Jasper B. Hofker, H. Sijbrand Haveman, Jan-Willem Curr Opin Organ Transplant SMALL BOWEL TRANSPLANTATION: Edited by Laurens J. Ceulemans Intestinal failure secondary to short bowel syndrome is still a very serious condition. Treatment consists of parenteral nutrition to provide nutrients and maintain body weight. During the last decades, intestinal lengthening procedures have become more available. The goal of this review is to discuss the results of the literature on the most commonly performed intestinal lengthening procedures. RECENT FINDINGS: Longitudinal Intestinal Lengthening, Serial Transverse Enteroplasty (STEP), and Spiral Intestinal Lengthening and Tailoring (SILT) are currently the most frequently reported intestinal lengthening procedures. The most recent literature of these procedures is described with respect to indication, technical details, complications, short and long-term outcome, and PN independence. SUMMARY: On the basis of indication, surgical complexity, complications, and clinical success, we conclude that the STEP procedure is probably the best choice for most centers. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-04 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8900888/ /pubmed/35143433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000000957 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections. |
spellingShingle | SMALL BOWEL TRANSPLANTATION: Edited by Laurens J. Ceulemans van Praagh, Jasper B. Hofker, H. Sijbrand Haveman, Jan-Willem Comparing bowel lengthening procedures: which, when, and why? |
title | Comparing bowel lengthening procedures: which, when, and why? |
title_full | Comparing bowel lengthening procedures: which, when, and why? |
title_fullStr | Comparing bowel lengthening procedures: which, when, and why? |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing bowel lengthening procedures: which, when, and why? |
title_short | Comparing bowel lengthening procedures: which, when, and why? |
title_sort | comparing bowel lengthening procedures: which, when, and why? |
topic | SMALL BOWEL TRANSPLANTATION: Edited by Laurens J. Ceulemans |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8900888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35143433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000000957 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanpraaghjasperb comparingbowellengtheningprocedureswhichwhenandwhy AT hofkerhsijbrand comparingbowellengtheningprocedureswhichwhenandwhy AT havemanjanwillem comparingbowellengtheningprocedureswhichwhenandwhy |