Cargando…

Comparing bowel lengthening procedures: which, when, and why?

Intestinal failure secondary to short bowel syndrome is still a very serious condition. Treatment consists of parenteral nutrition to provide nutrients and maintain body weight. During the last decades, intestinal lengthening procedures have become more available. The goal of this review is to discu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Praagh, Jasper B., Hofker, H. Sijbrand, Haveman, Jan-Willem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8900888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35143433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000000957
_version_ 1784664226145501184
author van Praagh, Jasper B.
Hofker, H. Sijbrand
Haveman, Jan-Willem
author_facet van Praagh, Jasper B.
Hofker, H. Sijbrand
Haveman, Jan-Willem
author_sort van Praagh, Jasper B.
collection PubMed
description Intestinal failure secondary to short bowel syndrome is still a very serious condition. Treatment consists of parenteral nutrition to provide nutrients and maintain body weight. During the last decades, intestinal lengthening procedures have become more available. The goal of this review is to discuss the results of the literature on the most commonly performed intestinal lengthening procedures. RECENT FINDINGS: Longitudinal Intestinal Lengthening, Serial Transverse Enteroplasty (STEP), and Spiral Intestinal Lengthening and Tailoring (SILT) are currently the most frequently reported intestinal lengthening procedures. The most recent literature of these procedures is described with respect to indication, technical details, complications, short and long-term outcome, and PN independence. SUMMARY: On the basis of indication, surgical complexity, complications, and clinical success, we conclude that the STEP procedure is probably the best choice for most centers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8900888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89008882022-03-07 Comparing bowel lengthening procedures: which, when, and why? van Praagh, Jasper B. Hofker, H. Sijbrand Haveman, Jan-Willem Curr Opin Organ Transplant SMALL BOWEL TRANSPLANTATION: Edited by Laurens J. Ceulemans Intestinal failure secondary to short bowel syndrome is still a very serious condition. Treatment consists of parenteral nutrition to provide nutrients and maintain body weight. During the last decades, intestinal lengthening procedures have become more available. The goal of this review is to discuss the results of the literature on the most commonly performed intestinal lengthening procedures. RECENT FINDINGS: Longitudinal Intestinal Lengthening, Serial Transverse Enteroplasty (STEP), and Spiral Intestinal Lengthening and Tailoring (SILT) are currently the most frequently reported intestinal lengthening procedures. The most recent literature of these procedures is described with respect to indication, technical details, complications, short and long-term outcome, and PN independence. SUMMARY: On the basis of indication, surgical complexity, complications, and clinical success, we conclude that the STEP procedure is probably the best choice for most centers. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-04 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8900888/ /pubmed/35143433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000000957 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections.
spellingShingle SMALL BOWEL TRANSPLANTATION: Edited by Laurens J. Ceulemans
van Praagh, Jasper B.
Hofker, H. Sijbrand
Haveman, Jan-Willem
Comparing bowel lengthening procedures: which, when, and why?
title Comparing bowel lengthening procedures: which, when, and why?
title_full Comparing bowel lengthening procedures: which, when, and why?
title_fullStr Comparing bowel lengthening procedures: which, when, and why?
title_full_unstemmed Comparing bowel lengthening procedures: which, when, and why?
title_short Comparing bowel lengthening procedures: which, when, and why?
title_sort comparing bowel lengthening procedures: which, when, and why?
topic SMALL BOWEL TRANSPLANTATION: Edited by Laurens J. Ceulemans
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8900888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35143433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000000957
work_keys_str_mv AT vanpraaghjasperb comparingbowellengtheningprocedureswhichwhenandwhy
AT hofkerhsijbrand comparingbowellengtheningprocedureswhichwhenandwhy
AT havemanjanwillem comparingbowellengtheningprocedureswhichwhenandwhy