Cargando…
A Factor Analysis Model for Rapid Evaluation of the Semen Quality of Fertile Men in China
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to reduce the dimension of several indicators with a strong correlation when conducting semen quality analysis in a small number of comprehensive variables that could retain most of the information in the original variables. METHODS: A total of 1132 subjects...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8901226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35264856 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S341444 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to reduce the dimension of several indicators with a strong correlation when conducting semen quality analysis in a small number of comprehensive variables that could retain most of the information in the original variables. METHODS: A total of 1132 subjects were recruited from the Maternal and Child Health Institutions of seven provinces in mainland China. They completed the questionnaire and provided semen samples. Visualization of the correlation between variables was realized by using a function chart and correlation in the PerformanceAnalytics package of the R programming language (version 3.6.3 [2020-02-29]). Factor analysis was conducted using the principal function in the psych package of R. Principal component analysis, combined with varimax rotation, was used in the operation of the model, and two common factors were selected and measured to provide values for the common factor. The score coefficient was estimated using the regression method. RESULTS: The contribution rates of the two common factors to variable X were 43.7% and 33.98%, respectively. When the two common factors were selected, approximately 78% of the information of the original variables could be explained. The correlation coefficients between the first common factor (the quantitative factor) and sperm density, total sperm count, and semen volume were 0.824, 0.984, and 0.544, respectively. The correlation coefficients between the second common factor (the quality factor) and sperm motility and the percentage of forward-moving (progressive spermatozoa) sperm were 0.978 and 0.976, respectively. CONCLUSION: The correlation between the original variables of a semen quality analysis was strong and suitable for dimensionality reduction by factor analysis. Factor analysis and dimensionality reduction provide a fast and accurate assessment of semen quality. Patients with low fertility or infertility can be identified and provided with corresponding treatments. |
---|