Cargando…
Current status of intra-cranial stereotactic radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery in Australia and New Zealand: key considerations from a workshop and surveys
Recently, there has been increased interest worldwide in the use of conventional linear accelerator (linac)-based systems for delivery of stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) contrasting with historical delivery in specialised clinics with dedicated equipment. In order to gain an underst...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8901507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35113342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13246-022-01108-4 |
_version_ | 1784664382794366976 |
---|---|
author | Pudsey, Lauren Haworth, Annette White, Paul Moutrie, Zoe Jonker, Benjamin Foote, Matthew Poder, Joel |
author_facet | Pudsey, Lauren Haworth, Annette White, Paul Moutrie, Zoe Jonker, Benjamin Foote, Matthew Poder, Joel |
author_sort | Pudsey, Lauren |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recently, there has been increased interest worldwide in the use of conventional linear accelerator (linac)-based systems for delivery of stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) contrasting with historical delivery in specialised clinics with dedicated equipment. In order to gain an understanding and define the current status of SRS/SRT delivery in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) we conducted surveys and provided a single-day workshop. Prior to the workshop ANZ medical physicists were invited to complete two surveys: a departmental survey regarding SRS/SRT practises and equipment; and an individual survey regarding opinions on current and future SRS/SRT practices. At the workshop conclusion, attendees completed a second opinion-based survey. Workshop discussion and survey data were utilised to identify areas of consensus, and areas where a community consensus was unclear. The workshop was held on the 8th Sept 2020 virtually due to pandemic-related travel restrictions and was attended by 238 radiation oncology medical physicists from 39 departments. The departmental survey received 32 responses; a further 89 and 142 responses were received to the pre-workshop and post-workshop surveys respectively. Workshop discussion indicated a consensus that for a department to offer an SRS/SRT service, a minimum case load should be considered depending on availability of training, peer-review, resources and equipment. It was suggested this service may be limited to brain metastases only, with less common indications reserved for departments with comprehensive SRS/SRT programs. Whilst most centres showed consensus with treatment delivery techniques and image guidance, opinions varied on the minimum target diameter and treatment margin that should be applied. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8901507 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89015072022-03-15 Current status of intra-cranial stereotactic radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery in Australia and New Zealand: key considerations from a workshop and surveys Pudsey, Lauren Haworth, Annette White, Paul Moutrie, Zoe Jonker, Benjamin Foote, Matthew Poder, Joel Phys Eng Sci Med Scientific Paper Recently, there has been increased interest worldwide in the use of conventional linear accelerator (linac)-based systems for delivery of stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) contrasting with historical delivery in specialised clinics with dedicated equipment. In order to gain an understanding and define the current status of SRS/SRT delivery in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) we conducted surveys and provided a single-day workshop. Prior to the workshop ANZ medical physicists were invited to complete two surveys: a departmental survey regarding SRS/SRT practises and equipment; and an individual survey regarding opinions on current and future SRS/SRT practices. At the workshop conclusion, attendees completed a second opinion-based survey. Workshop discussion and survey data were utilised to identify areas of consensus, and areas where a community consensus was unclear. The workshop was held on the 8th Sept 2020 virtually due to pandemic-related travel restrictions and was attended by 238 radiation oncology medical physicists from 39 departments. The departmental survey received 32 responses; a further 89 and 142 responses were received to the pre-workshop and post-workshop surveys respectively. Workshop discussion indicated a consensus that for a department to offer an SRS/SRT service, a minimum case load should be considered depending on availability of training, peer-review, resources and equipment. It was suggested this service may be limited to brain metastases only, with less common indications reserved for departments with comprehensive SRS/SRT programs. Whilst most centres showed consensus with treatment delivery techniques and image guidance, opinions varied on the minimum target diameter and treatment margin that should be applied. Springer International Publishing 2022-02-03 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8901507/ /pubmed/35113342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13246-022-01108-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Scientific Paper Pudsey, Lauren Haworth, Annette White, Paul Moutrie, Zoe Jonker, Benjamin Foote, Matthew Poder, Joel Current status of intra-cranial stereotactic radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery in Australia and New Zealand: key considerations from a workshop and surveys |
title | Current status of intra-cranial stereotactic radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery in Australia and New Zealand: key considerations from a workshop and surveys |
title_full | Current status of intra-cranial stereotactic radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery in Australia and New Zealand: key considerations from a workshop and surveys |
title_fullStr | Current status of intra-cranial stereotactic radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery in Australia and New Zealand: key considerations from a workshop and surveys |
title_full_unstemmed | Current status of intra-cranial stereotactic radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery in Australia and New Zealand: key considerations from a workshop and surveys |
title_short | Current status of intra-cranial stereotactic radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery in Australia and New Zealand: key considerations from a workshop and surveys |
title_sort | current status of intra-cranial stereotactic radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery in australia and new zealand: key considerations from a workshop and surveys |
topic | Scientific Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8901507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35113342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13246-022-01108-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pudseylauren currentstatusofintracranialstereotacticradiotherapyandstereotacticradiosurgeryinaustraliaandnewzealandkeyconsiderationsfromaworkshopandsurveys AT haworthannette currentstatusofintracranialstereotacticradiotherapyandstereotacticradiosurgeryinaustraliaandnewzealandkeyconsiderationsfromaworkshopandsurveys AT whitepaul currentstatusofintracranialstereotacticradiotherapyandstereotacticradiosurgeryinaustraliaandnewzealandkeyconsiderationsfromaworkshopandsurveys AT moutriezoe currentstatusofintracranialstereotacticradiotherapyandstereotacticradiosurgeryinaustraliaandnewzealandkeyconsiderationsfromaworkshopandsurveys AT jonkerbenjamin currentstatusofintracranialstereotacticradiotherapyandstereotacticradiosurgeryinaustraliaandnewzealandkeyconsiderationsfromaworkshopandsurveys AT footematthew currentstatusofintracranialstereotacticradiotherapyandstereotacticradiosurgeryinaustraliaandnewzealandkeyconsiderationsfromaworkshopandsurveys AT poderjoel currentstatusofintracranialstereotacticradiotherapyandstereotacticradiosurgeryinaustraliaandnewzealandkeyconsiderationsfromaworkshopandsurveys |