Cargando…

Hemodynamic force analysis is not ready for clinical trials on HFpEF

Hemodynamic force analysis has been proposed as a novel tool for early detection of subclinical systolic dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Here we investigated the ability of hemodynamic forces to discriminate between healthy subjects and heart failure patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arvidsson, Per M., Nelsson, Anders, Magnusson, Martin, Smith, J. Gustav, Carlsson, Marcus, Arheden, Håkan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8901629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35256713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08023-4
_version_ 1784664407127621632
author Arvidsson, Per M.
Nelsson, Anders
Magnusson, Martin
Smith, J. Gustav
Carlsson, Marcus
Arheden, Håkan
author_facet Arvidsson, Per M.
Nelsson, Anders
Magnusson, Martin
Smith, J. Gustav
Carlsson, Marcus
Arheden, Håkan
author_sort Arvidsson, Per M.
collection PubMed
description Hemodynamic force analysis has been proposed as a novel tool for early detection of subclinical systolic dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Here we investigated the ability of hemodynamic forces to discriminate between healthy subjects and heart failure patients with varying degrees of systolic dysfunction. We studied 34 controls, 16 HFpEF patients, and 25 heart failure patients with mid-range (HFmrEF) or reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) using cardiac magnetic resonance with acquisition of cine images and 4D flow at 1.5 T. The Navier–Stokes equation was used to compute global left ventricular hemodynamic forces over the entire cardiac cycle. Forces were analyzed for systole, diastole, and the entire heartbeat, with and without normalization to left ventricular volume. Volume-normalized hemodynamic forces demonstrated significant positive correlation with EF (r(2) = 0.47, p < 0.0001) and were found significantly lower in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction compared to controls (p < 0.0001 for systole and diastole). No difference was seen between controls and HFpEF (p > 0.34). Non-normalized forces displayed no differences between controls and HFpEF (p > 0.24 for all analyses) and did not correlate with EF (p = 0.36). Left ventricular hemodynamic force analysis, whether indexed to LV volumes or not, is not ready for clinical trials on HFpEF assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8901629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89016292022-03-08 Hemodynamic force analysis is not ready for clinical trials on HFpEF Arvidsson, Per M. Nelsson, Anders Magnusson, Martin Smith, J. Gustav Carlsson, Marcus Arheden, Håkan Sci Rep Article Hemodynamic force analysis has been proposed as a novel tool for early detection of subclinical systolic dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Here we investigated the ability of hemodynamic forces to discriminate between healthy subjects and heart failure patients with varying degrees of systolic dysfunction. We studied 34 controls, 16 HFpEF patients, and 25 heart failure patients with mid-range (HFmrEF) or reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) using cardiac magnetic resonance with acquisition of cine images and 4D flow at 1.5 T. The Navier–Stokes equation was used to compute global left ventricular hemodynamic forces over the entire cardiac cycle. Forces were analyzed for systole, diastole, and the entire heartbeat, with and without normalization to left ventricular volume. Volume-normalized hemodynamic forces demonstrated significant positive correlation with EF (r(2) = 0.47, p < 0.0001) and were found significantly lower in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction compared to controls (p < 0.0001 for systole and diastole). No difference was seen between controls and HFpEF (p > 0.34). Non-normalized forces displayed no differences between controls and HFpEF (p > 0.24 for all analyses) and did not correlate with EF (p = 0.36). Left ventricular hemodynamic force analysis, whether indexed to LV volumes or not, is not ready for clinical trials on HFpEF assessment. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8901629/ /pubmed/35256713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08023-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Arvidsson, Per M.
Nelsson, Anders
Magnusson, Martin
Smith, J. Gustav
Carlsson, Marcus
Arheden, Håkan
Hemodynamic force analysis is not ready for clinical trials on HFpEF
title Hemodynamic force analysis is not ready for clinical trials on HFpEF
title_full Hemodynamic force analysis is not ready for clinical trials on HFpEF
title_fullStr Hemodynamic force analysis is not ready for clinical trials on HFpEF
title_full_unstemmed Hemodynamic force analysis is not ready for clinical trials on HFpEF
title_short Hemodynamic force analysis is not ready for clinical trials on HFpEF
title_sort hemodynamic force analysis is not ready for clinical trials on hfpef
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8901629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35256713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08023-4
work_keys_str_mv AT arvidssonperm hemodynamicforceanalysisisnotreadyforclinicaltrialsonhfpef
AT nelssonanders hemodynamicforceanalysisisnotreadyforclinicaltrialsonhfpef
AT magnussonmartin hemodynamicforceanalysisisnotreadyforclinicaltrialsonhfpef
AT smithjgustav hemodynamicforceanalysisisnotreadyforclinicaltrialsonhfpef
AT carlssonmarcus hemodynamicforceanalysisisnotreadyforclinicaltrialsonhfpef
AT arhedenhakan hemodynamicforceanalysisisnotreadyforclinicaltrialsonhfpef