Cargando…
Hemodynamic force analysis is not ready for clinical trials on HFpEF
Hemodynamic force analysis has been proposed as a novel tool for early detection of subclinical systolic dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Here we investigated the ability of hemodynamic forces to discriminate between healthy subjects and heart failure patients w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8901629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35256713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08023-4 |
_version_ | 1784664407127621632 |
---|---|
author | Arvidsson, Per M. Nelsson, Anders Magnusson, Martin Smith, J. Gustav Carlsson, Marcus Arheden, Håkan |
author_facet | Arvidsson, Per M. Nelsson, Anders Magnusson, Martin Smith, J. Gustav Carlsson, Marcus Arheden, Håkan |
author_sort | Arvidsson, Per M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Hemodynamic force analysis has been proposed as a novel tool for early detection of subclinical systolic dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Here we investigated the ability of hemodynamic forces to discriminate between healthy subjects and heart failure patients with varying degrees of systolic dysfunction. We studied 34 controls, 16 HFpEF patients, and 25 heart failure patients with mid-range (HFmrEF) or reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) using cardiac magnetic resonance with acquisition of cine images and 4D flow at 1.5 T. The Navier–Stokes equation was used to compute global left ventricular hemodynamic forces over the entire cardiac cycle. Forces were analyzed for systole, diastole, and the entire heartbeat, with and without normalization to left ventricular volume. Volume-normalized hemodynamic forces demonstrated significant positive correlation with EF (r(2) = 0.47, p < 0.0001) and were found significantly lower in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction compared to controls (p < 0.0001 for systole and diastole). No difference was seen between controls and HFpEF (p > 0.34). Non-normalized forces displayed no differences between controls and HFpEF (p > 0.24 for all analyses) and did not correlate with EF (p = 0.36). Left ventricular hemodynamic force analysis, whether indexed to LV volumes or not, is not ready for clinical trials on HFpEF assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8901629 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89016292022-03-08 Hemodynamic force analysis is not ready for clinical trials on HFpEF Arvidsson, Per M. Nelsson, Anders Magnusson, Martin Smith, J. Gustav Carlsson, Marcus Arheden, Håkan Sci Rep Article Hemodynamic force analysis has been proposed as a novel tool for early detection of subclinical systolic dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Here we investigated the ability of hemodynamic forces to discriminate between healthy subjects and heart failure patients with varying degrees of systolic dysfunction. We studied 34 controls, 16 HFpEF patients, and 25 heart failure patients with mid-range (HFmrEF) or reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) using cardiac magnetic resonance with acquisition of cine images and 4D flow at 1.5 T. The Navier–Stokes equation was used to compute global left ventricular hemodynamic forces over the entire cardiac cycle. Forces were analyzed for systole, diastole, and the entire heartbeat, with and without normalization to left ventricular volume. Volume-normalized hemodynamic forces demonstrated significant positive correlation with EF (r(2) = 0.47, p < 0.0001) and were found significantly lower in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction compared to controls (p < 0.0001 for systole and diastole). No difference was seen between controls and HFpEF (p > 0.34). Non-normalized forces displayed no differences between controls and HFpEF (p > 0.24 for all analyses) and did not correlate with EF (p = 0.36). Left ventricular hemodynamic force analysis, whether indexed to LV volumes or not, is not ready for clinical trials on HFpEF assessment. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8901629/ /pubmed/35256713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08023-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Arvidsson, Per M. Nelsson, Anders Magnusson, Martin Smith, J. Gustav Carlsson, Marcus Arheden, Håkan Hemodynamic force analysis is not ready for clinical trials on HFpEF |
title | Hemodynamic force analysis is not ready for clinical trials on HFpEF |
title_full | Hemodynamic force analysis is not ready for clinical trials on HFpEF |
title_fullStr | Hemodynamic force analysis is not ready for clinical trials on HFpEF |
title_full_unstemmed | Hemodynamic force analysis is not ready for clinical trials on HFpEF |
title_short | Hemodynamic force analysis is not ready for clinical trials on HFpEF |
title_sort | hemodynamic force analysis is not ready for clinical trials on hfpef |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8901629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35256713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08023-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arvidssonperm hemodynamicforceanalysisisnotreadyforclinicaltrialsonhfpef AT nelssonanders hemodynamicforceanalysisisnotreadyforclinicaltrialsonhfpef AT magnussonmartin hemodynamicforceanalysisisnotreadyforclinicaltrialsonhfpef AT smithjgustav hemodynamicforceanalysisisnotreadyforclinicaltrialsonhfpef AT carlssonmarcus hemodynamicforceanalysisisnotreadyforclinicaltrialsonhfpef AT arhedenhakan hemodynamicforceanalysisisnotreadyforclinicaltrialsonhfpef |