Cargando…
Implementing patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patients in the United States
BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used increasingly in routine clinical care and inform policies, reimbursements, and quality improvement. Less is known regarding PRO implementation in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patient populations. OBJECTIVE: This review a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8901833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35254556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00428-z |
_version_ | 1784664457765453824 |
---|---|
author | Hyland, Colby J. Guo, Ruby Dhawan, Ravi Kaur, Manraj N. Bain, Paul A. Edelen, Maria O. Pusic, Andrea L. |
author_facet | Hyland, Colby J. Guo, Ruby Dhawan, Ravi Kaur, Manraj N. Bain, Paul A. Edelen, Maria O. Pusic, Andrea L. |
author_sort | Hyland, Colby J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used increasingly in routine clinical care and inform policies, reimbursements, and quality improvement. Less is known regarding PRO implementation in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patient populations. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to identify studies of PRO implementation in diverse and underrepresented patient populations, elucidate representation of clinical specialties, assess implementation outcomes, and synthesize patient needs, concerns, and preferences. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched September 2021 for studies aiming to study PRO implementation in diverse and underrepresented patient populations within the United States. Studies were screened and data extracted by three independent reviewers. Implementation outcomes were assessed according to Proctor et al. taxonomy. A descriptive analysis of data was conducted. RESULTS: The search yielded 8,687 records, and 28 studies met inclusion criteria. The majority were observational cohort studies (n = 21, 75%) and conducted in primary care (n = 10, 36%). Most studies included majority female (n = 19, 68%) and non-White populations (n = 15, 54%), while fewer reported socioeconomic (n = 11, 39%) or insurance status (n = 9, 32.1%). Most studies assessed implementation outcomes of feasibility (n = 27, 96%) and acceptability (n = 19, 68%); costs (n = 3, 11%), penetration (n = 1, 4%), and sustainability (n = 1, 4%) were infrequently assessed. CONCLUSION: PRO implementation in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patient populations is generally feasible and acceptable. Research is lacking in key clinical specialties. Further work is needed to understand how health disparities drive PRO implementation outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00428-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8901833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89018332022-03-15 Implementing patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patients in the United States Hyland, Colby J. Guo, Ruby Dhawan, Ravi Kaur, Manraj N. Bain, Paul A. Edelen, Maria O. Pusic, Andrea L. J Patient Rep Outcomes Review BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used increasingly in routine clinical care and inform policies, reimbursements, and quality improvement. Less is known regarding PRO implementation in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patient populations. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to identify studies of PRO implementation in diverse and underrepresented patient populations, elucidate representation of clinical specialties, assess implementation outcomes, and synthesize patient needs, concerns, and preferences. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched September 2021 for studies aiming to study PRO implementation in diverse and underrepresented patient populations within the United States. Studies were screened and data extracted by three independent reviewers. Implementation outcomes were assessed according to Proctor et al. taxonomy. A descriptive analysis of data was conducted. RESULTS: The search yielded 8,687 records, and 28 studies met inclusion criteria. The majority were observational cohort studies (n = 21, 75%) and conducted in primary care (n = 10, 36%). Most studies included majority female (n = 19, 68%) and non-White populations (n = 15, 54%), while fewer reported socioeconomic (n = 11, 39%) or insurance status (n = 9, 32.1%). Most studies assessed implementation outcomes of feasibility (n = 27, 96%) and acceptability (n = 19, 68%); costs (n = 3, 11%), penetration (n = 1, 4%), and sustainability (n = 1, 4%) were infrequently assessed. CONCLUSION: PRO implementation in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patient populations is generally feasible and acceptable. Research is lacking in key clinical specialties. Further work is needed to understand how health disparities drive PRO implementation outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00428-z. Springer International Publishing 2022-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8901833/ /pubmed/35254556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00428-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Hyland, Colby J. Guo, Ruby Dhawan, Ravi Kaur, Manraj N. Bain, Paul A. Edelen, Maria O. Pusic, Andrea L. Implementing patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patients in the United States |
title | Implementing patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patients in the United States |
title_full | Implementing patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patients in the United States |
title_fullStr | Implementing patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patients in the United States |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementing patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patients in the United States |
title_short | Implementing patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patients in the United States |
title_sort | implementing patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patients in the united states |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8901833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35254556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00428-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hylandcolbyj implementingpatientreportedoutcomesinroutineclinicalcarefordiverseandunderrepresentedpatientsintheunitedstates AT guoruby implementingpatientreportedoutcomesinroutineclinicalcarefordiverseandunderrepresentedpatientsintheunitedstates AT dhawanravi implementingpatientreportedoutcomesinroutineclinicalcarefordiverseandunderrepresentedpatientsintheunitedstates AT kaurmanrajn implementingpatientreportedoutcomesinroutineclinicalcarefordiverseandunderrepresentedpatientsintheunitedstates AT bainpaula implementingpatientreportedoutcomesinroutineclinicalcarefordiverseandunderrepresentedpatientsintheunitedstates AT edelenmariao implementingpatientreportedoutcomesinroutineclinicalcarefordiverseandunderrepresentedpatientsintheunitedstates AT pusicandreal implementingpatientreportedoutcomesinroutineclinicalcarefordiverseandunderrepresentedpatientsintheunitedstates |