Cargando…

Implementing patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patients in the United States

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used increasingly in routine clinical care and inform policies, reimbursements, and quality improvement. Less is known regarding PRO implementation in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patient populations. OBJECTIVE: This review a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hyland, Colby J., Guo, Ruby, Dhawan, Ravi, Kaur, Manraj N., Bain, Paul A., Edelen, Maria O., Pusic, Andrea L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8901833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35254556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00428-z
_version_ 1784664457765453824
author Hyland, Colby J.
Guo, Ruby
Dhawan, Ravi
Kaur, Manraj N.
Bain, Paul A.
Edelen, Maria O.
Pusic, Andrea L.
author_facet Hyland, Colby J.
Guo, Ruby
Dhawan, Ravi
Kaur, Manraj N.
Bain, Paul A.
Edelen, Maria O.
Pusic, Andrea L.
author_sort Hyland, Colby J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used increasingly in routine clinical care and inform policies, reimbursements, and quality improvement. Less is known regarding PRO implementation in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patient populations. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to identify studies of PRO implementation in diverse and underrepresented patient populations, elucidate representation of clinical specialties, assess implementation outcomes, and synthesize patient needs, concerns, and preferences. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched September 2021 for studies aiming to study PRO implementation in diverse and underrepresented patient populations within the United States. Studies were screened and data extracted by three independent reviewers. Implementation outcomes were assessed according to Proctor et al. taxonomy. A descriptive analysis of data was conducted. RESULTS: The search yielded 8,687 records, and 28 studies met inclusion criteria. The majority were observational cohort studies (n = 21, 75%) and conducted in primary care (n = 10, 36%). Most studies included majority female (n = 19, 68%) and non-White populations (n = 15, 54%), while fewer reported socioeconomic (n = 11, 39%) or insurance status (n = 9, 32.1%). Most studies assessed implementation outcomes of feasibility (n = 27, 96%) and acceptability (n = 19, 68%); costs (n = 3, 11%), penetration (n = 1, 4%), and sustainability (n = 1, 4%) were infrequently assessed. CONCLUSION: PRO implementation in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patient populations is generally feasible and acceptable. Research is lacking in key clinical specialties. Further work is needed to understand how health disparities drive PRO implementation outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00428-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8901833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89018332022-03-15 Implementing patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patients in the United States Hyland, Colby J. Guo, Ruby Dhawan, Ravi Kaur, Manraj N. Bain, Paul A. Edelen, Maria O. Pusic, Andrea L. J Patient Rep Outcomes Review BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used increasingly in routine clinical care and inform policies, reimbursements, and quality improvement. Less is known regarding PRO implementation in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patient populations. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to identify studies of PRO implementation in diverse and underrepresented patient populations, elucidate representation of clinical specialties, assess implementation outcomes, and synthesize patient needs, concerns, and preferences. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched September 2021 for studies aiming to study PRO implementation in diverse and underrepresented patient populations within the United States. Studies were screened and data extracted by three independent reviewers. Implementation outcomes were assessed according to Proctor et al. taxonomy. A descriptive analysis of data was conducted. RESULTS: The search yielded 8,687 records, and 28 studies met inclusion criteria. The majority were observational cohort studies (n = 21, 75%) and conducted in primary care (n = 10, 36%). Most studies included majority female (n = 19, 68%) and non-White populations (n = 15, 54%), while fewer reported socioeconomic (n = 11, 39%) or insurance status (n = 9, 32.1%). Most studies assessed implementation outcomes of feasibility (n = 27, 96%) and acceptability (n = 19, 68%); costs (n = 3, 11%), penetration (n = 1, 4%), and sustainability (n = 1, 4%) were infrequently assessed. CONCLUSION: PRO implementation in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patient populations is generally feasible and acceptable. Research is lacking in key clinical specialties. Further work is needed to understand how health disparities drive PRO implementation outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00428-z. Springer International Publishing 2022-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8901833/ /pubmed/35254556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00428-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Hyland, Colby J.
Guo, Ruby
Dhawan, Ravi
Kaur, Manraj N.
Bain, Paul A.
Edelen, Maria O.
Pusic, Andrea L.
Implementing patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patients in the United States
title Implementing patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patients in the United States
title_full Implementing patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patients in the United States
title_fullStr Implementing patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patients in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Implementing patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patients in the United States
title_short Implementing patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patients in the United States
title_sort implementing patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care for diverse and underrepresented patients in the united states
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8901833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35254556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00428-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hylandcolbyj implementingpatientreportedoutcomesinroutineclinicalcarefordiverseandunderrepresentedpatientsintheunitedstates
AT guoruby implementingpatientreportedoutcomesinroutineclinicalcarefordiverseandunderrepresentedpatientsintheunitedstates
AT dhawanravi implementingpatientreportedoutcomesinroutineclinicalcarefordiverseandunderrepresentedpatientsintheunitedstates
AT kaurmanrajn implementingpatientreportedoutcomesinroutineclinicalcarefordiverseandunderrepresentedpatientsintheunitedstates
AT bainpaula implementingpatientreportedoutcomesinroutineclinicalcarefordiverseandunderrepresentedpatientsintheunitedstates
AT edelenmariao implementingpatientreportedoutcomesinroutineclinicalcarefordiverseandunderrepresentedpatientsintheunitedstates
AT pusicandreal implementingpatientreportedoutcomesinroutineclinicalcarefordiverseandunderrepresentedpatientsintheunitedstates