Cargando…

Metastatic tumors to the pancreas: Balancing clinical impression with cytology findings

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Metastatic lesions of the pancreas (PMET) account for 1%–5% of all malignant solid pancreatic lesions (SPL). In this study we evaluated the utility of endoscopic ultrasonography with fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in diagnosing PMET. METHODS: Patients who underwent EUS-FNA at a c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdallah, Mohamed A., Bohy, Kimberlee, Singal, Ashwani, Xie, Chencheng, Patel, Bhaveshkumar, Nelson, Morgan E., Bleeker, Jonathan, Askeland, Ryan, Abdullah, Ammar, Aloreidi, Khalil, Atiq, Muslim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8901983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35168205
http://dx.doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.21-111
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Metastatic lesions of the pancreas (PMET) account for 1%–5% of all malignant solid pancreatic lesions (SPL). In this study we evaluated the utility of endoscopic ultrasonography with fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in diagnosing PMET. METHODS: Patients who underwent EUS-FNA at a community referral center between 2011–2017 for SPL were identified. Clinical, radiologic, and EUS-FNA features of those with PMET were compared to those with primary solid tumors of the pancreas: pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and neuroendocrine tumors (PNET). RESULTS: A total of 191 patients were diagnosed with solid pancreatic malignancy using EUS-FNA: 156 PDAC, 27 PNET, and eight (4.2%) had PMET. Patients with PMET were less likely to have abdominal pain (25.0% vs. 76.3% vs. 48.2%; p < 0.01) or obstructive jaundice (37.5% vs. 58.3% vs. 0%; p < 0.01) compared to PDAC and PNET. Those with PMET were more likely to have mass lesions with/without biliary or pancreatic ductal dilatations (100% vs. 86.5% vs. 85.2%; p < 0.01) and lower CA19-9 (82.5 ± 43.21 U/mL vs. 4,639.30 ± 11,489.68 U/mL vs. 10.50 ± 10.89 U/mL; p < 0.01) compared to PDAC and PNET. Endosonographic features were similar among all groups. Seven (87.5%) patients with PMET had a personal history of malignancy prior to PMET diagnosis. The primary malignancy was renal cell carcinoma in five PMET. CONCLUSIONS: PMET are exceedingly rare, comprising less than 5% of SLP. Patients with PMET are less likely to present with symptoms and mostly identified by surveillance imaging for the primary malignancy.