Cargando…
Effectiveness and failure factors of manual aspiration using a small needle for large pneumothorax in stable patients
BACKGROUND: Manual aspiration as the initial management of a large pneumothorax in a clinically stable patient has been reported to be safe and effective. However, the effect with smaller needles, the number of aspiration, the indication other than spontaneous pneumothorax and failure factors are un...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8902101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35280475 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-1587 |
_version_ | 1784664520973615104 |
---|---|
author | Homma, Takahiro Ojima, Toshihiro Shimada, Yoshifumi Tanabe, Keitaro Yamamoto, Yutaka Akemoto, Yushi Kitamura, Naoya |
author_facet | Homma, Takahiro Ojima, Toshihiro Shimada, Yoshifumi Tanabe, Keitaro Yamamoto, Yutaka Akemoto, Yushi Kitamura, Naoya |
author_sort | Homma, Takahiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Manual aspiration as the initial management of a large pneumothorax in a clinically stable patient has been reported to be safe and effective. However, the effect with smaller needles, the number of aspiration, the indication other than spontaneous pneumothorax and failure factors are unknown. We assessed the effectiveness and failure risk factors of manual aspiration up to three using a 20- or 22-gauge (G) needle in patients with a large, clinically stable pneumothorax. METHODS: We included 107 clinically stable patients with large pneumothorax. Patients who were unstable, required a ventilator, underwent chest tube drainage or had an observed small pneumothorax, bilateral pneumothorax, hemopneumothorax, or postoperative pneumothorax were excluded. Up to three aspirations were performed using 20- or 22-G intravenous needles. When the aspiration volume was ≥2,500 mL or lung expansion did not occur, a chest tube was placed. RESULTS: The first aspiration was successful in 57 patients (53.3%), the second in 16 patients (59.3%), and the third in eight patients (80.0%). No patient experienced any obvious complications or required emergent hospitalization or surgery after aspiration. Aspiration failure was correlated with an inter-pleural distance >20 mm at the level of the hilum [odds ratio (OR): 4.93; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.49–22.71; P=0.0075], spontaneous secondary pneumothorax (OR: 3.11; 95% CI: 1.14–8.76; P=0.027), and ≤24 h from onset to presentation (OR: 2.95; 95% CI: 1.12–8.26; P=0.028). There were no significant differences in intrathoracic pressure after aspiration or plasma factor XIII levels between patients with resolved and persistent pneumothorax. CONCLUSIONS: Manual aspiration up to three times using a small needle might be one of a treatment option in clinically stable patients with any large pneumothorax. Aspiration failure was correlated with an inter-pleural distance >20 mm at the level of the hilum, spontaneous secondary pneumothorax, and ≤24 h from onset to presentation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8902101 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89021012022-03-10 Effectiveness and failure factors of manual aspiration using a small needle for large pneumothorax in stable patients Homma, Takahiro Ojima, Toshihiro Shimada, Yoshifumi Tanabe, Keitaro Yamamoto, Yutaka Akemoto, Yushi Kitamura, Naoya J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Manual aspiration as the initial management of a large pneumothorax in a clinically stable patient has been reported to be safe and effective. However, the effect with smaller needles, the number of aspiration, the indication other than spontaneous pneumothorax and failure factors are unknown. We assessed the effectiveness and failure risk factors of manual aspiration up to three using a 20- or 22-gauge (G) needle in patients with a large, clinically stable pneumothorax. METHODS: We included 107 clinically stable patients with large pneumothorax. Patients who were unstable, required a ventilator, underwent chest tube drainage or had an observed small pneumothorax, bilateral pneumothorax, hemopneumothorax, or postoperative pneumothorax were excluded. Up to three aspirations were performed using 20- or 22-G intravenous needles. When the aspiration volume was ≥2,500 mL or lung expansion did not occur, a chest tube was placed. RESULTS: The first aspiration was successful in 57 patients (53.3%), the second in 16 patients (59.3%), and the third in eight patients (80.0%). No patient experienced any obvious complications or required emergent hospitalization or surgery after aspiration. Aspiration failure was correlated with an inter-pleural distance >20 mm at the level of the hilum [odds ratio (OR): 4.93; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.49–22.71; P=0.0075], spontaneous secondary pneumothorax (OR: 3.11; 95% CI: 1.14–8.76; P=0.027), and ≤24 h from onset to presentation (OR: 2.95; 95% CI: 1.12–8.26; P=0.028). There were no significant differences in intrathoracic pressure after aspiration or plasma factor XIII levels between patients with resolved and persistent pneumothorax. CONCLUSIONS: Manual aspiration up to three times using a small needle might be one of a treatment option in clinically stable patients with any large pneumothorax. Aspiration failure was correlated with an inter-pleural distance >20 mm at the level of the hilum, spontaneous secondary pneumothorax, and ≤24 h from onset to presentation. AME Publishing Company 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8902101/ /pubmed/35280475 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-1587 Text en 2022 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Homma, Takahiro Ojima, Toshihiro Shimada, Yoshifumi Tanabe, Keitaro Yamamoto, Yutaka Akemoto, Yushi Kitamura, Naoya Effectiveness and failure factors of manual aspiration using a small needle for large pneumothorax in stable patients |
title | Effectiveness and failure factors of manual aspiration using a small needle for large pneumothorax in stable patients |
title_full | Effectiveness and failure factors of manual aspiration using a small needle for large pneumothorax in stable patients |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness and failure factors of manual aspiration using a small needle for large pneumothorax in stable patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness and failure factors of manual aspiration using a small needle for large pneumothorax in stable patients |
title_short | Effectiveness and failure factors of manual aspiration using a small needle for large pneumothorax in stable patients |
title_sort | effectiveness and failure factors of manual aspiration using a small needle for large pneumothorax in stable patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8902101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35280475 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-1587 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hommatakahiro effectivenessandfailurefactorsofmanualaspirationusingasmallneedleforlargepneumothoraxinstablepatients AT ojimatoshihiro effectivenessandfailurefactorsofmanualaspirationusingasmallneedleforlargepneumothoraxinstablepatients AT shimadayoshifumi effectivenessandfailurefactorsofmanualaspirationusingasmallneedleforlargepneumothoraxinstablepatients AT tanabekeitaro effectivenessandfailurefactorsofmanualaspirationusingasmallneedleforlargepneumothoraxinstablepatients AT yamamotoyutaka effectivenessandfailurefactorsofmanualaspirationusingasmallneedleforlargepneumothoraxinstablepatients AT akemotoyushi effectivenessandfailurefactorsofmanualaspirationusingasmallneedleforlargepneumothoraxinstablepatients AT kitamuranaoya effectivenessandfailurefactorsofmanualaspirationusingasmallneedleforlargepneumothoraxinstablepatients |