Cargando…

Effectiveness and failure factors of manual aspiration using a small needle for large pneumothorax in stable patients

BACKGROUND: Manual aspiration as the initial management of a large pneumothorax in a clinically stable patient has been reported to be safe and effective. However, the effect with smaller needles, the number of aspiration, the indication other than spontaneous pneumothorax and failure factors are un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Homma, Takahiro, Ojima, Toshihiro, Shimada, Yoshifumi, Tanabe, Keitaro, Yamamoto, Yutaka, Akemoto, Yushi, Kitamura, Naoya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8902101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35280475
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-1587
_version_ 1784664520973615104
author Homma, Takahiro
Ojima, Toshihiro
Shimada, Yoshifumi
Tanabe, Keitaro
Yamamoto, Yutaka
Akemoto, Yushi
Kitamura, Naoya
author_facet Homma, Takahiro
Ojima, Toshihiro
Shimada, Yoshifumi
Tanabe, Keitaro
Yamamoto, Yutaka
Akemoto, Yushi
Kitamura, Naoya
author_sort Homma, Takahiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Manual aspiration as the initial management of a large pneumothorax in a clinically stable patient has been reported to be safe and effective. However, the effect with smaller needles, the number of aspiration, the indication other than spontaneous pneumothorax and failure factors are unknown. We assessed the effectiveness and failure risk factors of manual aspiration up to three using a 20- or 22-gauge (G) needle in patients with a large, clinically stable pneumothorax. METHODS: We included 107 clinically stable patients with large pneumothorax. Patients who were unstable, required a ventilator, underwent chest tube drainage or had an observed small pneumothorax, bilateral pneumothorax, hemopneumothorax, or postoperative pneumothorax were excluded. Up to three aspirations were performed using 20- or 22-G intravenous needles. When the aspiration volume was ≥2,500 mL or lung expansion did not occur, a chest tube was placed. RESULTS: The first aspiration was successful in 57 patients (53.3%), the second in 16 patients (59.3%), and the third in eight patients (80.0%). No patient experienced any obvious complications or required emergent hospitalization or surgery after aspiration. Aspiration failure was correlated with an inter-pleural distance >20 mm at the level of the hilum [odds ratio (OR): 4.93; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.49–22.71; P=0.0075], spontaneous secondary pneumothorax (OR: 3.11; 95% CI: 1.14–8.76; P=0.027), and ≤24 h from onset to presentation (OR: 2.95; 95% CI: 1.12–8.26; P=0.028). There were no significant differences in intrathoracic pressure after aspiration or plasma factor XIII levels between patients with resolved and persistent pneumothorax. CONCLUSIONS: Manual aspiration up to three times using a small needle might be one of a treatment option in clinically stable patients with any large pneumothorax. Aspiration failure was correlated with an inter-pleural distance >20 mm at the level of the hilum, spontaneous secondary pneumothorax, and ≤24 h from onset to presentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8902101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89021012022-03-10 Effectiveness and failure factors of manual aspiration using a small needle for large pneumothorax in stable patients Homma, Takahiro Ojima, Toshihiro Shimada, Yoshifumi Tanabe, Keitaro Yamamoto, Yutaka Akemoto, Yushi Kitamura, Naoya J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Manual aspiration as the initial management of a large pneumothorax in a clinically stable patient has been reported to be safe and effective. However, the effect with smaller needles, the number of aspiration, the indication other than spontaneous pneumothorax and failure factors are unknown. We assessed the effectiveness and failure risk factors of manual aspiration up to three using a 20- or 22-gauge (G) needle in patients with a large, clinically stable pneumothorax. METHODS: We included 107 clinically stable patients with large pneumothorax. Patients who were unstable, required a ventilator, underwent chest tube drainage or had an observed small pneumothorax, bilateral pneumothorax, hemopneumothorax, or postoperative pneumothorax were excluded. Up to three aspirations were performed using 20- or 22-G intravenous needles. When the aspiration volume was ≥2,500 mL or lung expansion did not occur, a chest tube was placed. RESULTS: The first aspiration was successful in 57 patients (53.3%), the second in 16 patients (59.3%), and the third in eight patients (80.0%). No patient experienced any obvious complications or required emergent hospitalization or surgery after aspiration. Aspiration failure was correlated with an inter-pleural distance >20 mm at the level of the hilum [odds ratio (OR): 4.93; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.49–22.71; P=0.0075], spontaneous secondary pneumothorax (OR: 3.11; 95% CI: 1.14–8.76; P=0.027), and ≤24 h from onset to presentation (OR: 2.95; 95% CI: 1.12–8.26; P=0.028). There were no significant differences in intrathoracic pressure after aspiration or plasma factor XIII levels between patients with resolved and persistent pneumothorax. CONCLUSIONS: Manual aspiration up to three times using a small needle might be one of a treatment option in clinically stable patients with any large pneumothorax. Aspiration failure was correlated with an inter-pleural distance >20 mm at the level of the hilum, spontaneous secondary pneumothorax, and ≤24 h from onset to presentation. AME Publishing Company 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8902101/ /pubmed/35280475 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-1587 Text en 2022 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Homma, Takahiro
Ojima, Toshihiro
Shimada, Yoshifumi
Tanabe, Keitaro
Yamamoto, Yutaka
Akemoto, Yushi
Kitamura, Naoya
Effectiveness and failure factors of manual aspiration using a small needle for large pneumothorax in stable patients
title Effectiveness and failure factors of manual aspiration using a small needle for large pneumothorax in stable patients
title_full Effectiveness and failure factors of manual aspiration using a small needle for large pneumothorax in stable patients
title_fullStr Effectiveness and failure factors of manual aspiration using a small needle for large pneumothorax in stable patients
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and failure factors of manual aspiration using a small needle for large pneumothorax in stable patients
title_short Effectiveness and failure factors of manual aspiration using a small needle for large pneumothorax in stable patients
title_sort effectiveness and failure factors of manual aspiration using a small needle for large pneumothorax in stable patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8902101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35280475
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-1587
work_keys_str_mv AT hommatakahiro effectivenessandfailurefactorsofmanualaspirationusingasmallneedleforlargepneumothoraxinstablepatients
AT ojimatoshihiro effectivenessandfailurefactorsofmanualaspirationusingasmallneedleforlargepneumothoraxinstablepatients
AT shimadayoshifumi effectivenessandfailurefactorsofmanualaspirationusingasmallneedleforlargepneumothoraxinstablepatients
AT tanabekeitaro effectivenessandfailurefactorsofmanualaspirationusingasmallneedleforlargepneumothoraxinstablepatients
AT yamamotoyutaka effectivenessandfailurefactorsofmanualaspirationusingasmallneedleforlargepneumothoraxinstablepatients
AT akemotoyushi effectivenessandfailurefactorsofmanualaspirationusingasmallneedleforlargepneumothoraxinstablepatients
AT kitamuranaoya effectivenessandfailurefactorsofmanualaspirationusingasmallneedleforlargepneumothoraxinstablepatients