Cargando…

Hypofractionated vs. standard radiotherapy for locally advanced limited-stage small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Hypofractionated radiotherapy in locally advanced limited-stage small cell lung cancer is preferred in many Western countries but not used regularly in the United States. We examined practice patterns and overall survival with definitive hypofractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy vs....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saeed, Nadia A., Jin, Lan, Sasse, Alexander W., Amini, Arya, Verma, Vivek, Lester-Coll, Nataniel H., Chen, Po-Han, Decker, Roy H., Park, Henry S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8902118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35280466
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-1566
_version_ 1784664525394411520
author Saeed, Nadia A.
Jin, Lan
Sasse, Alexander W.
Amini, Arya
Verma, Vivek
Lester-Coll, Nataniel H.
Chen, Po-Han
Decker, Roy H.
Park, Henry S.
author_facet Saeed, Nadia A.
Jin, Lan
Sasse, Alexander W.
Amini, Arya
Verma, Vivek
Lester-Coll, Nataniel H.
Chen, Po-Han
Decker, Roy H.
Park, Henry S.
author_sort Saeed, Nadia A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hypofractionated radiotherapy in locally advanced limited-stage small cell lung cancer is preferred in many Western countries but not used regularly in the United States. We examined practice patterns and overall survival with definitive hypofractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy vs. standard radiotherapy in this setting. METHODS: We included patients in the National Cancer Database with unresected primary stage II–III small cell lung cancer in 2008–2016 who underwent chemotherapy within six months of either hypofractionated radiotherapy (40–45 Gy/15 fractions) or standard radiotherapy (45 Gy/30 fractions or 60–70 Gy/30–35 fractions) in this retrospective cohort study. Patient characteristics were assessed with univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and multivariable Cox regression were used to evaluate overall survival. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed as a sensitivity analysis. Early concurrent chemotherapy consisted of radiotherapy and chemotherapy initiated within 30 days of each other. RESULTS: Seven thousand and one hundred forty-three patients were included: 97.9% received standard radiotherapy and 2.1% hypofractionated radiotherapy. Multivariable analysis on the whole cohort yielded comparable overall survival (HR for hypofractionated radiotherapy 1.09, CI: 0.90–1.32, P=0.37). On PSM (N=292), median overall survival was similar between standard radiotherapy [22.9 months (95% CI: 18.2–30.4 months)] vs. hypofractionated radiotherapy [21.2 months (CI: 16.3–24.7 months); P=0.13]. Overall survival was shorter with hypofractionated radiotherapy in the early concurrent chemotherapy subset (15.8 vs. 22.1 months, P=0.007) and longer with hypofractionated radiotherapy in the non-early concurrent chemotherapy subset (29.5 vs. 18.5 months, P=0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival with hypofractionated radiotherapy appears similar to standard radiotherapy in locally advanced limited-stage small cell lung cancer. Chemotherapy timing may modify the effect of fractionation on overall survival, though larger numbers must confirm. Hypofractionated radiotherapy may be considered in those unable to receive early concurrent chemotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8902118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89021182022-03-10 Hypofractionated vs. standard radiotherapy for locally advanced limited-stage small cell lung cancer Saeed, Nadia A. Jin, Lan Sasse, Alexander W. Amini, Arya Verma, Vivek Lester-Coll, Nataniel H. Chen, Po-Han Decker, Roy H. Park, Henry S. J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Hypofractionated radiotherapy in locally advanced limited-stage small cell lung cancer is preferred in many Western countries but not used regularly in the United States. We examined practice patterns and overall survival with definitive hypofractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy vs. standard radiotherapy in this setting. METHODS: We included patients in the National Cancer Database with unresected primary stage II–III small cell lung cancer in 2008–2016 who underwent chemotherapy within six months of either hypofractionated radiotherapy (40–45 Gy/15 fractions) or standard radiotherapy (45 Gy/30 fractions or 60–70 Gy/30–35 fractions) in this retrospective cohort study. Patient characteristics were assessed with univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and multivariable Cox regression were used to evaluate overall survival. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed as a sensitivity analysis. Early concurrent chemotherapy consisted of radiotherapy and chemotherapy initiated within 30 days of each other. RESULTS: Seven thousand and one hundred forty-three patients were included: 97.9% received standard radiotherapy and 2.1% hypofractionated radiotherapy. Multivariable analysis on the whole cohort yielded comparable overall survival (HR for hypofractionated radiotherapy 1.09, CI: 0.90–1.32, P=0.37). On PSM (N=292), median overall survival was similar between standard radiotherapy [22.9 months (95% CI: 18.2–30.4 months)] vs. hypofractionated radiotherapy [21.2 months (CI: 16.3–24.7 months); P=0.13]. Overall survival was shorter with hypofractionated radiotherapy in the early concurrent chemotherapy subset (15.8 vs. 22.1 months, P=0.007) and longer with hypofractionated radiotherapy in the non-early concurrent chemotherapy subset (29.5 vs. 18.5 months, P=0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival with hypofractionated radiotherapy appears similar to standard radiotherapy in locally advanced limited-stage small cell lung cancer. Chemotherapy timing may modify the effect of fractionation on overall survival, though larger numbers must confirm. Hypofractionated radiotherapy may be considered in those unable to receive early concurrent chemotherapy. AME Publishing Company 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8902118/ /pubmed/35280466 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-1566 Text en 2022 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Saeed, Nadia A.
Jin, Lan
Sasse, Alexander W.
Amini, Arya
Verma, Vivek
Lester-Coll, Nataniel H.
Chen, Po-Han
Decker, Roy H.
Park, Henry S.
Hypofractionated vs. standard radiotherapy for locally advanced limited-stage small cell lung cancer
title Hypofractionated vs. standard radiotherapy for locally advanced limited-stage small cell lung cancer
title_full Hypofractionated vs. standard radiotherapy for locally advanced limited-stage small cell lung cancer
title_fullStr Hypofractionated vs. standard radiotherapy for locally advanced limited-stage small cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Hypofractionated vs. standard radiotherapy for locally advanced limited-stage small cell lung cancer
title_short Hypofractionated vs. standard radiotherapy for locally advanced limited-stage small cell lung cancer
title_sort hypofractionated vs. standard radiotherapy for locally advanced limited-stage small cell lung cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8902118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35280466
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-1566
work_keys_str_mv AT saeednadiaa hypofractionatedvsstandardradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedlimitedstagesmallcelllungcancer
AT jinlan hypofractionatedvsstandardradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedlimitedstagesmallcelllungcancer
AT sassealexanderw hypofractionatedvsstandardradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedlimitedstagesmallcelllungcancer
AT aminiarya hypofractionatedvsstandardradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedlimitedstagesmallcelllungcancer
AT vermavivek hypofractionatedvsstandardradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedlimitedstagesmallcelllungcancer
AT lestercollnatanielh hypofractionatedvsstandardradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedlimitedstagesmallcelllungcancer
AT chenpohan hypofractionatedvsstandardradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedlimitedstagesmallcelllungcancer
AT deckerroyh hypofractionatedvsstandardradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedlimitedstagesmallcelllungcancer
AT parkhenrys hypofractionatedvsstandardradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedlimitedstagesmallcelllungcancer