Cargando…

How particular is the physics of the free energy principle?

The free energy principle (FEP) states that any dynamical system can be interpreted as performing Bayesian inference upon its surrounding environment. Although, in theory, the FEP applies to a wide variety of systems, there has been almost no direct exploration or demonstration of the principle in c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aguilera, Miguel, Millidge, Beren, Tschantz, Alexander, Buckley, Christopher L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8902446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34895862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2021.11.001
_version_ 1784664601678315520
author Aguilera, Miguel
Millidge, Beren
Tschantz, Alexander
Buckley, Christopher L.
author_facet Aguilera, Miguel
Millidge, Beren
Tschantz, Alexander
Buckley, Christopher L.
author_sort Aguilera, Miguel
collection PubMed
description The free energy principle (FEP) states that any dynamical system can be interpreted as performing Bayesian inference upon its surrounding environment. Although, in theory, the FEP applies to a wide variety of systems, there has been almost no direct exploration or demonstration of the principle in concrete systems. In this work, we examine in depth the assumptions required to derive the FEP in the simplest possible set of systems – weakly-coupled non-equilibrium linear stochastic systems. Specifically, we explore (i) how general the requirements imposed on the statistical structure of a system are and (ii) how informative the FEP is about the behaviour of such systems. We discover that two requirements of the FEP – the Markov blanket condition (i.e. a statistical boundary precluding direct coupling between internal and external states) and stringent restrictions on its solenoidal flows (i.e. tendencies driving a system out of equilibrium) – are only valid for a very narrow space of parameters. Suitable systems require an absence of perception-action asymmetries that is highly unusual for living systems interacting with an environment. More importantly, we observe that a mathematically central step in the argument, connecting the behaviour of a system to variational inference, relies on an implicit equivalence between the dynamics of the average states of a system with the average of the dynamics of those states. This equivalence does not hold in general even for linear stochastic systems, since it requires an effective decoupling from the system's history of interactions. These observations are critical for evaluating the generality and applicability of the FEP and indicate the existence of significant problems of the theory in its current form. These issues make the FEP, as it stands, not straightforwardly applicable to the simple linear systems studied here and suggest that more development is needed before the theory could be applied to the kind of complex systems that describe living and cognitive processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8902446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89024462022-03-11 How particular is the physics of the free energy principle? Aguilera, Miguel Millidge, Beren Tschantz, Alexander Buckley, Christopher L. Phys Life Rev Review The free energy principle (FEP) states that any dynamical system can be interpreted as performing Bayesian inference upon its surrounding environment. Although, in theory, the FEP applies to a wide variety of systems, there has been almost no direct exploration or demonstration of the principle in concrete systems. In this work, we examine in depth the assumptions required to derive the FEP in the simplest possible set of systems – weakly-coupled non-equilibrium linear stochastic systems. Specifically, we explore (i) how general the requirements imposed on the statistical structure of a system are and (ii) how informative the FEP is about the behaviour of such systems. We discover that two requirements of the FEP – the Markov blanket condition (i.e. a statistical boundary precluding direct coupling between internal and external states) and stringent restrictions on its solenoidal flows (i.e. tendencies driving a system out of equilibrium) – are only valid for a very narrow space of parameters. Suitable systems require an absence of perception-action asymmetries that is highly unusual for living systems interacting with an environment. More importantly, we observe that a mathematically central step in the argument, connecting the behaviour of a system to variational inference, relies on an implicit equivalence between the dynamics of the average states of a system with the average of the dynamics of those states. This equivalence does not hold in general even for linear stochastic systems, since it requires an effective decoupling from the system's history of interactions. These observations are critical for evaluating the generality and applicability of the FEP and indicate the existence of significant problems of the theory in its current form. These issues make the FEP, as it stands, not straightforwardly applicable to the simple linear systems studied here and suggest that more development is needed before the theory could be applied to the kind of complex systems that describe living and cognitive processes. Elsevier 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8902446/ /pubmed/34895862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2021.11.001 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Aguilera, Miguel
Millidge, Beren
Tschantz, Alexander
Buckley, Christopher L.
How particular is the physics of the free energy principle?
title How particular is the physics of the free energy principle?
title_full How particular is the physics of the free energy principle?
title_fullStr How particular is the physics of the free energy principle?
title_full_unstemmed How particular is the physics of the free energy principle?
title_short How particular is the physics of the free energy principle?
title_sort how particular is the physics of the free energy principle?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8902446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34895862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2021.11.001
work_keys_str_mv AT aguileramiguel howparticularisthephysicsofthefreeenergyprinciple
AT millidgeberen howparticularisthephysicsofthefreeenergyprinciple
AT tschantzalexander howparticularisthephysicsofthefreeenergyprinciple
AT buckleychristopherl howparticularisthephysicsofthefreeenergyprinciple