Cargando…

Effect of Clinical Decision Support on Cardiovascular Risk Among Adults With Bipolar Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder, or Schizophrenia: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE: Adults with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder, collectively termed serious mental illness (SMI), have shortened life spans compared with people without SMI. The leading cause of death is cardiovascular (CV) disease. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a clinical decis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rossom, Rebecca C., Crain, A. Lauren, O’Connor, Patrick J., Waring, Stephen C., Hooker, Stephanie A., Ohnsorg, Kris, Taran, Allise, Kopski, Kristen M., Sperl-Hillen, JoAnn M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8902652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35254433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0202
_version_ 1784664634815414272
author Rossom, Rebecca C.
Crain, A. Lauren
O’Connor, Patrick J.
Waring, Stephen C.
Hooker, Stephanie A.
Ohnsorg, Kris
Taran, Allise
Kopski, Kristen M.
Sperl-Hillen, JoAnn M.
author_facet Rossom, Rebecca C.
Crain, A. Lauren
O’Connor, Patrick J.
Waring, Stephen C.
Hooker, Stephanie A.
Ohnsorg, Kris
Taran, Allise
Kopski, Kristen M.
Sperl-Hillen, JoAnn M.
author_sort Rossom, Rebecca C.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Adults with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder, collectively termed serious mental illness (SMI), have shortened life spans compared with people without SMI. The leading cause of death is cardiovascular (CV) disease. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a clinical decision support (CDS) system aimed at primary care clinicians improves CV health for adult primary care patients with SMI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cluster randomized clinical trial conducted from March 2, 2016, to September 19, 2018, restricted randomization assigned 76 primary care clinics in 3 Midwestern health care systems to receive or not receive a CDS system aimed at improving CV health among patients with SMI. Eligible clinics had at least 20 patients with SMI; clinicians and their adult patients with SMI with at least 1 modifiable CV risk factor not at the goal set by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines were included. Statistical analysis was conducted on an intention-to-treat basis from January 10, 2019, to December 29, 2021. INTERVENTION: The CDS system assessed modifiable CV risk factors and provided personalized treatment recommendations to clinicians and patients. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patient-level change in total modifiable CV risk over 12 months, summed from individual modifiable risk factors (smoking, body mass index, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, systolic blood pressure, and hemoglobin A(1c) level). RESULTS: A total of 80 clinics were randomized; 4 clinics were excluded for having fewer than 20 eligible patients, leaving 42 intervention clinics and 34 control clinics. A total of 8937 patients with SMI (4922 women [55.1%]; mean [SD] age, 48.4 [13.5] years) were enrolled. There was a 4% lower rate of increase in total modifiable CV risk among intervention patients relative to control patients (relative rate ratio [RR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.98). The intervention favored patients who were 18 to 29 years of age (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.98) or 50 to 59 years of age (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.96), Black (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.98), or White (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.98). Men (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99) and women (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.97), as well as patients with any SMI subtype (bipolar disorder: RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99; schizoaffective disorder: RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-0.98; schizophrenia: RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.85-0.99) also benefited from the intervention. Despite treatment effects favoring the intervention, there were no significant differences in individual modifiable risk factors. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This CDS intervention resulted in a rate of change in total modifiable CV risk that was 4% lower among intervention patients compared with control patients. Results were driven by the cumulative effects of incremental and mostly nonsignificant changes in individual modifiable risk factors. These findings emphasize the value of using CDS to prompt early primary care intervention for adults with SMI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02451670
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8902652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89026522022-03-11 Effect of Clinical Decision Support on Cardiovascular Risk Among Adults With Bipolar Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder, or Schizophrenia: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial Rossom, Rebecca C. Crain, A. Lauren O’Connor, Patrick J. Waring, Stephen C. Hooker, Stephanie A. Ohnsorg, Kris Taran, Allise Kopski, Kristen M. Sperl-Hillen, JoAnn M. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Adults with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder, collectively termed serious mental illness (SMI), have shortened life spans compared with people without SMI. The leading cause of death is cardiovascular (CV) disease. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a clinical decision support (CDS) system aimed at primary care clinicians improves CV health for adult primary care patients with SMI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cluster randomized clinical trial conducted from March 2, 2016, to September 19, 2018, restricted randomization assigned 76 primary care clinics in 3 Midwestern health care systems to receive or not receive a CDS system aimed at improving CV health among patients with SMI. Eligible clinics had at least 20 patients with SMI; clinicians and their adult patients with SMI with at least 1 modifiable CV risk factor not at the goal set by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines were included. Statistical analysis was conducted on an intention-to-treat basis from January 10, 2019, to December 29, 2021. INTERVENTION: The CDS system assessed modifiable CV risk factors and provided personalized treatment recommendations to clinicians and patients. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patient-level change in total modifiable CV risk over 12 months, summed from individual modifiable risk factors (smoking, body mass index, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, systolic blood pressure, and hemoglobin A(1c) level). RESULTS: A total of 80 clinics were randomized; 4 clinics were excluded for having fewer than 20 eligible patients, leaving 42 intervention clinics and 34 control clinics. A total of 8937 patients with SMI (4922 women [55.1%]; mean [SD] age, 48.4 [13.5] years) were enrolled. There was a 4% lower rate of increase in total modifiable CV risk among intervention patients relative to control patients (relative rate ratio [RR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.98). The intervention favored patients who were 18 to 29 years of age (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.98) or 50 to 59 years of age (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.96), Black (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.98), or White (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.98). Men (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99) and women (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.97), as well as patients with any SMI subtype (bipolar disorder: RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99; schizoaffective disorder: RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-0.98; schizophrenia: RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.85-0.99) also benefited from the intervention. Despite treatment effects favoring the intervention, there were no significant differences in individual modifiable risk factors. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This CDS intervention resulted in a rate of change in total modifiable CV risk that was 4% lower among intervention patients compared with control patients. Results were driven by the cumulative effects of incremental and mostly nonsignificant changes in individual modifiable risk factors. These findings emphasize the value of using CDS to prompt early primary care intervention for adults with SMI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02451670 American Medical Association 2022-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8902652/ /pubmed/35254433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0202 Text en Copyright 2022 Rossom RC et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Rossom, Rebecca C.
Crain, A. Lauren
O’Connor, Patrick J.
Waring, Stephen C.
Hooker, Stephanie A.
Ohnsorg, Kris
Taran, Allise
Kopski, Kristen M.
Sperl-Hillen, JoAnn M.
Effect of Clinical Decision Support on Cardiovascular Risk Among Adults With Bipolar Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder, or Schizophrenia: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial
title Effect of Clinical Decision Support on Cardiovascular Risk Among Adults With Bipolar Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder, or Schizophrenia: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Effect of Clinical Decision Support on Cardiovascular Risk Among Adults With Bipolar Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder, or Schizophrenia: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Effect of Clinical Decision Support on Cardiovascular Risk Among Adults With Bipolar Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder, or Schizophrenia: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Clinical Decision Support on Cardiovascular Risk Among Adults With Bipolar Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder, or Schizophrenia: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Effect of Clinical Decision Support on Cardiovascular Risk Among Adults With Bipolar Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder, or Schizophrenia: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort effect of clinical decision support on cardiovascular risk among adults with bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, or schizophrenia: a cluster randomized clinical trial
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8902652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35254433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0202
work_keys_str_mv AT rossomrebeccac effectofclinicaldecisionsupportoncardiovascularriskamongadultswithbipolardisorderschizoaffectivedisorderorschizophreniaaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT crainalauren effectofclinicaldecisionsupportoncardiovascularriskamongadultswithbipolardisorderschizoaffectivedisorderorschizophreniaaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT oconnorpatrickj effectofclinicaldecisionsupportoncardiovascularriskamongadultswithbipolardisorderschizoaffectivedisorderorschizophreniaaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT waringstephenc effectofclinicaldecisionsupportoncardiovascularriskamongadultswithbipolardisorderschizoaffectivedisorderorschizophreniaaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hookerstephaniea effectofclinicaldecisionsupportoncardiovascularriskamongadultswithbipolardisorderschizoaffectivedisorderorschizophreniaaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ohnsorgkris effectofclinicaldecisionsupportoncardiovascularriskamongadultswithbipolardisorderschizoaffectivedisorderorschizophreniaaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT taranallise effectofclinicaldecisionsupportoncardiovascularriskamongadultswithbipolardisorderschizoaffectivedisorderorschizophreniaaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kopskikristenm effectofclinicaldecisionsupportoncardiovascularriskamongadultswithbipolardisorderschizoaffectivedisorderorschizophreniaaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT sperlhillenjoannm effectofclinicaldecisionsupportoncardiovascularriskamongadultswithbipolardisorderschizoaffectivedisorderorschizophreniaaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrial