Cargando…

Use of a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in High-Risk Hospitalized Noncritically Ill Patients With Diabetes After Cardiac Surgery and During Their Transition of Care From the Intensive Care Unit During COVID-19: A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has demonstrated benefits in managing inpatient diabetes. We initiated this single-arm pilot feasibility study during the COVID-19 pandemic in 11 patients with diabetes to determine the feasibility and accuracy of real-time CGM in patients who underwent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sweeney, Ann T., Pena, Samara, Sandeep, Jeena, Hernandez, Bryan, Chen, Ye, Breeze, Janis L., Bulut, Aysegul, Feghali, Karen, Abdelrehim, Moaz, Abdelazeem, Mohamed, Srivoleti, Padmavathi, Salvucci, Linda, Cann, Susan Berry, Norman, Catalina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AACE. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8902897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35276324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eprac.2022.03.001
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has demonstrated benefits in managing inpatient diabetes. We initiated this single-arm pilot feasibility study during the COVID-19 pandemic in 11 patients with diabetes to determine the feasibility and accuracy of real-time CGM in patients who underwent cardiac surgery and whose care was being transitioned from the intensive care unit. METHODS: A Clarke error grid analysis was used to compare CGM and point-of-care measurements. The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) of the paired measurements was calculated to assess the accuracy of CGM for glucose measurements during the first 24 hours on CGM, the remaining time on CGM, and for different chronic kidney disease (CKD) strata. RESULTS: Overall MARD between point-of-care and CGM measurements was 14.80%. MARD for patients without CKD IV and V with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥20 mL/min/1.73 m(2) was 12.13%. Overall, 97% of the CGM values were within the no-risk zone of the Clarke error grid analysis. For the first 24 hours, a sensitivity analysis of the overall MARD for all patients and those with an eGFR of ≥20 mL/min/1.73 m(2) was 15.42% ± 14.44% and 12.80% ± 7.85%, respectively. Beyond the first 24 hours, overall MARD for all patients and those with an eGFR of ≥20 mL/min/1.73 m(2) was 14.54% ± 13.21% and 11.86% ± 7.64%, respectively. CONCLUSION: CGM has shown great promise in optimizing inpatient diabetes management in the noncritical care setting and after the transition of care from the intensive care unit with high clinical reliability and accuracy. More studies are needed to further assess CGM in patients with advanced CKD.