Cargando…
Eptinezumab treatment initiated during a migraine attack is associated with meaningful improvement in patient-reported outcome measures: secondary results from the randomized controlled RELIEF study
BACKGROUND: Demonstrating therapeutic value from the patient perspective is important in patient-centered migraine management. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of eptinezumab, a preventive migraine treatment, on patient-reported headache impact, acute medication optimization...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8903522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-021-01376-7 |
_version_ | 1784664755619758080 |
---|---|
author | McAllister, Peter Winner, Paul K. Ailani, Jessica Buse, Dawn C. Lipton, Richard B. Chakhava, George Josiassen, Mette Krog Lindsten, Annika Mehta, Lahar Ettrup, Anders Cady, Roger |
author_facet | McAllister, Peter Winner, Paul K. Ailani, Jessica Buse, Dawn C. Lipton, Richard B. Chakhava, George Josiassen, Mette Krog Lindsten, Annika Mehta, Lahar Ettrup, Anders Cady, Roger |
author_sort | McAllister, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Demonstrating therapeutic value from the patient perspective is important in patient-centered migraine management. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of eptinezumab, a preventive migraine treatment, on patient-reported headache impact, acute medication optimization, and perception of disease change when initiated during a migraine attack. METHODS: RELIEF was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted between 2019 and 2020 in adults with ≥1-year history of migraine and 4–15 migraine days per month in the 3 months prior to screening. Patients were randomized (1:1) to a 30-min infusion of eptinezumab 100 mg or placebo within 1–6 h of a qualifying migraine attack onset. The 6-item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) and 6-item Migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire (mTOQ-6) were administered at baseline and week 4, and the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at week 4. A post hoc analysis of these measures was conducted in patients who reported headache pain freedom at 2 h after infusion start. RESULTS: Of 480 patients enrolled and treated, 476 completed the study and are included in this analysis. Mean baseline HIT-6 total scores indicated severe headache impact (eptinezumab, 65.1; placebo, 64.8). At week 4, the eptinezumab-treated group demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in HIT-6 total score compared with placebo (mean change from baseline: eptinezumab, − 8.7; placebo, − 4.5; mean [95% CI] difference from placebo: − 4.2 [− 5.75, − 2.63], P < .0001), with greater reductions in each item score vs placebo (P < .001 all comparisons). Change in HIT-6 total score in the subgroup with 2-h headache pain freedom was − 13.8 for the eptinezumab group compared with − 4.9 for the placebo group. mTOQ-6 total score mean change from baseline favored eptinezumab (change, 2.1) compared with placebo (1.2; mean [95% CI] difference: 0.9 [0.3, 1.5], P < .01). More eptinezumab-treated patients rated PGIC as much or very much improved than placebo patients (59.3% vs 25.9%). CONCLUSIONS: When administered during a migraine attack, eptinezumab significantly improved patient-reported outcomes after 4 weeks compared with placebo, with particularly pronounced effects in patients reporting headache pain freedom at 2 h after infusion start. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04152083. November 5, 2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-021-01376-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8903522 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89035222022-03-18 Eptinezumab treatment initiated during a migraine attack is associated with meaningful improvement in patient-reported outcome measures: secondary results from the randomized controlled RELIEF study McAllister, Peter Winner, Paul K. Ailani, Jessica Buse, Dawn C. Lipton, Richard B. Chakhava, George Josiassen, Mette Krog Lindsten, Annika Mehta, Lahar Ettrup, Anders Cady, Roger J Headache Pain Research Article BACKGROUND: Demonstrating therapeutic value from the patient perspective is important in patient-centered migraine management. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of eptinezumab, a preventive migraine treatment, on patient-reported headache impact, acute medication optimization, and perception of disease change when initiated during a migraine attack. METHODS: RELIEF was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted between 2019 and 2020 in adults with ≥1-year history of migraine and 4–15 migraine days per month in the 3 months prior to screening. Patients were randomized (1:1) to a 30-min infusion of eptinezumab 100 mg or placebo within 1–6 h of a qualifying migraine attack onset. The 6-item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) and 6-item Migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire (mTOQ-6) were administered at baseline and week 4, and the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at week 4. A post hoc analysis of these measures was conducted in patients who reported headache pain freedom at 2 h after infusion start. RESULTS: Of 480 patients enrolled and treated, 476 completed the study and are included in this analysis. Mean baseline HIT-6 total scores indicated severe headache impact (eptinezumab, 65.1; placebo, 64.8). At week 4, the eptinezumab-treated group demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in HIT-6 total score compared with placebo (mean change from baseline: eptinezumab, − 8.7; placebo, − 4.5; mean [95% CI] difference from placebo: − 4.2 [− 5.75, − 2.63], P < .0001), with greater reductions in each item score vs placebo (P < .001 all comparisons). Change in HIT-6 total score in the subgroup with 2-h headache pain freedom was − 13.8 for the eptinezumab group compared with − 4.9 for the placebo group. mTOQ-6 total score mean change from baseline favored eptinezumab (change, 2.1) compared with placebo (1.2; mean [95% CI] difference: 0.9 [0.3, 1.5], P < .01). More eptinezumab-treated patients rated PGIC as much or very much improved than placebo patients (59.3% vs 25.9%). CONCLUSIONS: When administered during a migraine attack, eptinezumab significantly improved patient-reported outcomes after 4 weeks compared with placebo, with particularly pronounced effects in patients reporting headache pain freedom at 2 h after infusion start. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04152083. November 5, 2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-021-01376-7. Springer Milan 2022-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8903522/ /pubmed/35130832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-021-01376-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article McAllister, Peter Winner, Paul K. Ailani, Jessica Buse, Dawn C. Lipton, Richard B. Chakhava, George Josiassen, Mette Krog Lindsten, Annika Mehta, Lahar Ettrup, Anders Cady, Roger Eptinezumab treatment initiated during a migraine attack is associated with meaningful improvement in patient-reported outcome measures: secondary results from the randomized controlled RELIEF study |
title | Eptinezumab treatment initiated during a migraine attack is associated with meaningful improvement in patient-reported outcome measures: secondary results from the randomized controlled RELIEF study |
title_full | Eptinezumab treatment initiated during a migraine attack is associated with meaningful improvement in patient-reported outcome measures: secondary results from the randomized controlled RELIEF study |
title_fullStr | Eptinezumab treatment initiated during a migraine attack is associated with meaningful improvement in patient-reported outcome measures: secondary results from the randomized controlled RELIEF study |
title_full_unstemmed | Eptinezumab treatment initiated during a migraine attack is associated with meaningful improvement in patient-reported outcome measures: secondary results from the randomized controlled RELIEF study |
title_short | Eptinezumab treatment initiated during a migraine attack is associated with meaningful improvement in patient-reported outcome measures: secondary results from the randomized controlled RELIEF study |
title_sort | eptinezumab treatment initiated during a migraine attack is associated with meaningful improvement in patient-reported outcome measures: secondary results from the randomized controlled relief study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8903522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-021-01376-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcallisterpeter eptinezumabtreatmentinitiatedduringamigraineattackisassociatedwithmeaningfulimprovementinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuressecondaryresultsfromtherandomizedcontrolledreliefstudy AT winnerpaulk eptinezumabtreatmentinitiatedduringamigraineattackisassociatedwithmeaningfulimprovementinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuressecondaryresultsfromtherandomizedcontrolledreliefstudy AT ailanijessica eptinezumabtreatmentinitiatedduringamigraineattackisassociatedwithmeaningfulimprovementinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuressecondaryresultsfromtherandomizedcontrolledreliefstudy AT busedawnc eptinezumabtreatmentinitiatedduringamigraineattackisassociatedwithmeaningfulimprovementinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuressecondaryresultsfromtherandomizedcontrolledreliefstudy AT liptonrichardb eptinezumabtreatmentinitiatedduringamigraineattackisassociatedwithmeaningfulimprovementinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuressecondaryresultsfromtherandomizedcontrolledreliefstudy AT chakhavageorge eptinezumabtreatmentinitiatedduringamigraineattackisassociatedwithmeaningfulimprovementinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuressecondaryresultsfromtherandomizedcontrolledreliefstudy AT josiassenmettekrog eptinezumabtreatmentinitiatedduringamigraineattackisassociatedwithmeaningfulimprovementinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuressecondaryresultsfromtherandomizedcontrolledreliefstudy AT lindstenannika eptinezumabtreatmentinitiatedduringamigraineattackisassociatedwithmeaningfulimprovementinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuressecondaryresultsfromtherandomizedcontrolledreliefstudy AT mehtalahar eptinezumabtreatmentinitiatedduringamigraineattackisassociatedwithmeaningfulimprovementinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuressecondaryresultsfromtherandomizedcontrolledreliefstudy AT ettrupanders eptinezumabtreatmentinitiatedduringamigraineattackisassociatedwithmeaningfulimprovementinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuressecondaryresultsfromtherandomizedcontrolledreliefstudy AT cadyroger eptinezumabtreatmentinitiatedduringamigraineattackisassociatedwithmeaningfulimprovementinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuressecondaryresultsfromtherandomizedcontrolledreliefstudy |