Cargando…
Talent cultivation in health technology assessment: an expert survey
BACKGROUND: Health technology assessment (HTA) has become essential in many countries over the past few years, and the demand for HTA professionals has increased in academia, governments, and industries. This study aimed to examine which courses are most important and which training activities are m...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8903637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35260163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03214-z |
_version_ | 1784664783062040576 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Yu-Shan Chen, Chiehfeng Wang, Lin-Chien Jian, Li-Shan Ko, Yu |
author_facet | Wu, Yu-Shan Chen, Chiehfeng Wang, Lin-Chien Jian, Li-Shan Ko, Yu |
author_sort | Wu, Yu-Shan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Health technology assessment (HTA) has become essential in many countries over the past few years, and the demand for HTA professionals has increased in academia, governments, and industries. This study aimed to examine which courses are most important and which training activities are most helpful for the development of HTA proficiency as perceived by HTA experts. METHODS: The survey questionnaire was developed by literature review and expert opinion. Convenience sampling was used to survey HTA experts from the industrial sector, academic/research units, and government/independent assessment organizations using an online survey tool, SurveyCake. We collected respondents’ demographic information and asked them to assess the importance of each course included in an HTA program on a 5-point Likert Scale (1 = least important; 5 = highly important). In addition, respondents were asked to assess the extent to which various activities are helpful for HTA proficiency development. RESULTS: A total of 158 domestic and overseas experts in HTA-related fields were invited to participate in the survey and 68 completed the questionnaire. Among the respondents, the majority were female (57.4%) and working in academia (44.1%). The mean ± standard deviation of respondents’ age and number of years spent in HTA-related fields were 43.2 ± 11.0 years and 11.3 ± 9.9 years, respectively. The course that was rated the most important was “Pharmacoeconomics/Cost-effectiveness analysis” with a score of 4.8 ± 0.4 points, followed by “Health economics” at 4.7 ± 0.7 points. Moreover, internships at HTA-related institutions were perceived to be the most helpful training activity for HTA proficiency development. CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings provide a better understanding of the requirements for developing HTA proficiency and can serve as a reference for the modification of current HTA education and training programs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03214-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8903637 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89036372022-03-18 Talent cultivation in health technology assessment: an expert survey Wu, Yu-Shan Chen, Chiehfeng Wang, Lin-Chien Jian, Li-Shan Ko, Yu BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Health technology assessment (HTA) has become essential in many countries over the past few years, and the demand for HTA professionals has increased in academia, governments, and industries. This study aimed to examine which courses are most important and which training activities are most helpful for the development of HTA proficiency as perceived by HTA experts. METHODS: The survey questionnaire was developed by literature review and expert opinion. Convenience sampling was used to survey HTA experts from the industrial sector, academic/research units, and government/independent assessment organizations using an online survey tool, SurveyCake. We collected respondents’ demographic information and asked them to assess the importance of each course included in an HTA program on a 5-point Likert Scale (1 = least important; 5 = highly important). In addition, respondents were asked to assess the extent to which various activities are helpful for HTA proficiency development. RESULTS: A total of 158 domestic and overseas experts in HTA-related fields were invited to participate in the survey and 68 completed the questionnaire. Among the respondents, the majority were female (57.4%) and working in academia (44.1%). The mean ± standard deviation of respondents’ age and number of years spent in HTA-related fields were 43.2 ± 11.0 years and 11.3 ± 9.9 years, respectively. The course that was rated the most important was “Pharmacoeconomics/Cost-effectiveness analysis” with a score of 4.8 ± 0.4 points, followed by “Health economics” at 4.7 ± 0.7 points. Moreover, internships at HTA-related institutions were perceived to be the most helpful training activity for HTA proficiency development. CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings provide a better understanding of the requirements for developing HTA proficiency and can serve as a reference for the modification of current HTA education and training programs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03214-z. BioMed Central 2022-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8903637/ /pubmed/35260163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03214-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Wu, Yu-Shan Chen, Chiehfeng Wang, Lin-Chien Jian, Li-Shan Ko, Yu Talent cultivation in health technology assessment: an expert survey |
title | Talent cultivation in health technology assessment: an expert survey |
title_full | Talent cultivation in health technology assessment: an expert survey |
title_fullStr | Talent cultivation in health technology assessment: an expert survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Talent cultivation in health technology assessment: an expert survey |
title_short | Talent cultivation in health technology assessment: an expert survey |
title_sort | talent cultivation in health technology assessment: an expert survey |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8903637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35260163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03214-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wuyushan talentcultivationinhealthtechnologyassessmentanexpertsurvey AT chenchiehfeng talentcultivationinhealthtechnologyassessmentanexpertsurvey AT wanglinchien talentcultivationinhealthtechnologyassessmentanexpertsurvey AT jianlishan talentcultivationinhealthtechnologyassessmentanexpertsurvey AT koyu talentcultivationinhealthtechnologyassessmentanexpertsurvey |