Cargando…

Effectiveness and acceptability of noninvasive brain and nerve stimulation techniques for migraine prophylaxis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Current pharmacologic prophylactic strategies for migraine have exhibited limited efficacy, with response rates as low as 40%–50%. In addition to the limited efficacy, the acceptability of those pharmacologic prophylactic strategies were unacceptable. Although noninvasive brain/nerve sti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Yu-Chen, Zeng, Bing-Yan, Hung, Chao-Ming, Su, Kuan-Pin, Wu, Yi-Cheng, Tu, Yu-Kang, Lin, Pao-Yen, Stubbs, Brendon, Carvalho, Andre F., Liang, Chih-Sung, Chen, Tien-Yu, Hsu, Chih-Wei, Brunoni, Andre R., Suen, Mein-Woei, Shiue, Yow-Ling, Tseng, Ping-Tao, Wu, Ming-Kung, Li, Cheng-Ta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8903676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35184742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01401-3
_version_ 1784664792118591488
author Cheng, Yu-Chen
Zeng, Bing-Yan
Hung, Chao-Ming
Su, Kuan-Pin
Wu, Yi-Cheng
Tu, Yu-Kang
Lin, Pao-Yen
Stubbs, Brendon
Carvalho, Andre F.
Liang, Chih-Sung
Chen, Tien-Yu
Hsu, Chih-Wei
Brunoni, Andre R.
Suen, Mein-Woei
Shiue, Yow-Ling
Tseng, Ping-Tao
Wu, Ming-Kung
Li, Cheng-Ta
author_facet Cheng, Yu-Chen
Zeng, Bing-Yan
Hung, Chao-Ming
Su, Kuan-Pin
Wu, Yi-Cheng
Tu, Yu-Kang
Lin, Pao-Yen
Stubbs, Brendon
Carvalho, Andre F.
Liang, Chih-Sung
Chen, Tien-Yu
Hsu, Chih-Wei
Brunoni, Andre R.
Suen, Mein-Woei
Shiue, Yow-Ling
Tseng, Ping-Tao
Wu, Ming-Kung
Li, Cheng-Ta
author_sort Cheng, Yu-Chen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current pharmacologic prophylactic strategies for migraine have exhibited limited efficacy, with response rates as low as 40%–50%. In addition to the limited efficacy, the acceptability of those pharmacologic prophylactic strategies were unacceptable. Although noninvasive brain/nerve stimulation strategies may be effective, the evidence has been inconsistent. The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare strategies of noninvasive brain/nerve stimulation for migraine prophylaxis with respect to their effectiveness and acceptability. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, ClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalKey, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were systematically searched to date of June 4th, 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Patients with diagnosis of migraine, either episodic migraine or chronic migraine, were included. All NMA procedures were conducted under the frequentist model. RESULTS: Nineteen RCTs were included (N = 1493; mean age = 38.2 years; 82.0% women). We determined that the high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over C3 yielded the most decreased monthly migraine days among all the interventions [mean difference = − 8.70 days, 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs): − 14.45 to − 2.95 compared to sham/control groups]. Only alternating frequency (2/100 Hz) transcutaneous occipital nerve stimulation (tONS) over the Oz (RR = 0.36, 95%CIs: 0.16 to 0.82) yielded a significantly lower drop-out rate than the sham/control groups did. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provided a new direction for the design of more methodologically robust and larger RCTs based on the findings of the potentially beneficial effect on migraine prophylaxis in participants with migraine by different noninvasive brain/nerve stimulation, especially the application of rTMS and tONS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42021252638. The current study had been approval by the Institutional Review Board of the Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center (TSGHIRB No. B-109-29). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-022-01401-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8903676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89036762022-03-18 Effectiveness and acceptability of noninvasive brain and nerve stimulation techniques for migraine prophylaxis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Cheng, Yu-Chen Zeng, Bing-Yan Hung, Chao-Ming Su, Kuan-Pin Wu, Yi-Cheng Tu, Yu-Kang Lin, Pao-Yen Stubbs, Brendon Carvalho, Andre F. Liang, Chih-Sung Chen, Tien-Yu Hsu, Chih-Wei Brunoni, Andre R. Suen, Mein-Woei Shiue, Yow-Ling Tseng, Ping-Tao Wu, Ming-Kung Li, Cheng-Ta J Headache Pain Research Article BACKGROUND: Current pharmacologic prophylactic strategies for migraine have exhibited limited efficacy, with response rates as low as 40%–50%. In addition to the limited efficacy, the acceptability of those pharmacologic prophylactic strategies were unacceptable. Although noninvasive brain/nerve stimulation strategies may be effective, the evidence has been inconsistent. The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare strategies of noninvasive brain/nerve stimulation for migraine prophylaxis with respect to their effectiveness and acceptability. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, ClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalKey, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were systematically searched to date of June 4th, 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Patients with diagnosis of migraine, either episodic migraine or chronic migraine, were included. All NMA procedures were conducted under the frequentist model. RESULTS: Nineteen RCTs were included (N = 1493; mean age = 38.2 years; 82.0% women). We determined that the high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over C3 yielded the most decreased monthly migraine days among all the interventions [mean difference = − 8.70 days, 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs): − 14.45 to − 2.95 compared to sham/control groups]. Only alternating frequency (2/100 Hz) transcutaneous occipital nerve stimulation (tONS) over the Oz (RR = 0.36, 95%CIs: 0.16 to 0.82) yielded a significantly lower drop-out rate than the sham/control groups did. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provided a new direction for the design of more methodologically robust and larger RCTs based on the findings of the potentially beneficial effect on migraine prophylaxis in participants with migraine by different noninvasive brain/nerve stimulation, especially the application of rTMS and tONS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42021252638. The current study had been approval by the Institutional Review Board of the Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center (TSGHIRB No. B-109-29). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-022-01401-3. Springer Milan 2022-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8903676/ /pubmed/35184742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01401-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cheng, Yu-Chen
Zeng, Bing-Yan
Hung, Chao-Ming
Su, Kuan-Pin
Wu, Yi-Cheng
Tu, Yu-Kang
Lin, Pao-Yen
Stubbs, Brendon
Carvalho, Andre F.
Liang, Chih-Sung
Chen, Tien-Yu
Hsu, Chih-Wei
Brunoni, Andre R.
Suen, Mein-Woei
Shiue, Yow-Ling
Tseng, Ping-Tao
Wu, Ming-Kung
Li, Cheng-Ta
Effectiveness and acceptability of noninvasive brain and nerve stimulation techniques for migraine prophylaxis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Effectiveness and acceptability of noninvasive brain and nerve stimulation techniques for migraine prophylaxis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Effectiveness and acceptability of noninvasive brain and nerve stimulation techniques for migraine prophylaxis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Effectiveness and acceptability of noninvasive brain and nerve stimulation techniques for migraine prophylaxis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and acceptability of noninvasive brain and nerve stimulation techniques for migraine prophylaxis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Effectiveness and acceptability of noninvasive brain and nerve stimulation techniques for migraine prophylaxis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort effectiveness and acceptability of noninvasive brain and nerve stimulation techniques for migraine prophylaxis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8903676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35184742
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01401-3
work_keys_str_mv AT chengyuchen effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zengbingyan effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT hungchaoming effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT sukuanpin effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wuyicheng effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT tuyukang effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT linpaoyen effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT stubbsbrendon effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT carvalhoandref effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liangchihsung effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chentienyu effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT hsuchihwei effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT brunoniandrer effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT suenmeinwoei effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT shiueyowling effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT tsengpingtao effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wumingkung effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lichengta effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials