Cargando…
Effectiveness and acceptability of noninvasive brain and nerve stimulation techniques for migraine prophylaxis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND: Current pharmacologic prophylactic strategies for migraine have exhibited limited efficacy, with response rates as low as 40%–50%. In addition to the limited efficacy, the acceptability of those pharmacologic prophylactic strategies were unacceptable. Although noninvasive brain/nerve sti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8903676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35184742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01401-3 |
_version_ | 1784664792118591488 |
---|---|
author | Cheng, Yu-Chen Zeng, Bing-Yan Hung, Chao-Ming Su, Kuan-Pin Wu, Yi-Cheng Tu, Yu-Kang Lin, Pao-Yen Stubbs, Brendon Carvalho, Andre F. Liang, Chih-Sung Chen, Tien-Yu Hsu, Chih-Wei Brunoni, Andre R. Suen, Mein-Woei Shiue, Yow-Ling Tseng, Ping-Tao Wu, Ming-Kung Li, Cheng-Ta |
author_facet | Cheng, Yu-Chen Zeng, Bing-Yan Hung, Chao-Ming Su, Kuan-Pin Wu, Yi-Cheng Tu, Yu-Kang Lin, Pao-Yen Stubbs, Brendon Carvalho, Andre F. Liang, Chih-Sung Chen, Tien-Yu Hsu, Chih-Wei Brunoni, Andre R. Suen, Mein-Woei Shiue, Yow-Ling Tseng, Ping-Tao Wu, Ming-Kung Li, Cheng-Ta |
author_sort | Cheng, Yu-Chen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Current pharmacologic prophylactic strategies for migraine have exhibited limited efficacy, with response rates as low as 40%–50%. In addition to the limited efficacy, the acceptability of those pharmacologic prophylactic strategies were unacceptable. Although noninvasive brain/nerve stimulation strategies may be effective, the evidence has been inconsistent. The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare strategies of noninvasive brain/nerve stimulation for migraine prophylaxis with respect to their effectiveness and acceptability. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, ClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalKey, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were systematically searched to date of June 4th, 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Patients with diagnosis of migraine, either episodic migraine or chronic migraine, were included. All NMA procedures were conducted under the frequentist model. RESULTS: Nineteen RCTs were included (N = 1493; mean age = 38.2 years; 82.0% women). We determined that the high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over C3 yielded the most decreased monthly migraine days among all the interventions [mean difference = − 8.70 days, 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs): − 14.45 to − 2.95 compared to sham/control groups]. Only alternating frequency (2/100 Hz) transcutaneous occipital nerve stimulation (tONS) over the Oz (RR = 0.36, 95%CIs: 0.16 to 0.82) yielded a significantly lower drop-out rate than the sham/control groups did. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provided a new direction for the design of more methodologically robust and larger RCTs based on the findings of the potentially beneficial effect on migraine prophylaxis in participants with migraine by different noninvasive brain/nerve stimulation, especially the application of rTMS and tONS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42021252638. The current study had been approval by the Institutional Review Board of the Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center (TSGHIRB No. B-109-29). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-022-01401-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8903676 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89036762022-03-18 Effectiveness and acceptability of noninvasive brain and nerve stimulation techniques for migraine prophylaxis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Cheng, Yu-Chen Zeng, Bing-Yan Hung, Chao-Ming Su, Kuan-Pin Wu, Yi-Cheng Tu, Yu-Kang Lin, Pao-Yen Stubbs, Brendon Carvalho, Andre F. Liang, Chih-Sung Chen, Tien-Yu Hsu, Chih-Wei Brunoni, Andre R. Suen, Mein-Woei Shiue, Yow-Ling Tseng, Ping-Tao Wu, Ming-Kung Li, Cheng-Ta J Headache Pain Research Article BACKGROUND: Current pharmacologic prophylactic strategies for migraine have exhibited limited efficacy, with response rates as low as 40%–50%. In addition to the limited efficacy, the acceptability of those pharmacologic prophylactic strategies were unacceptable. Although noninvasive brain/nerve stimulation strategies may be effective, the evidence has been inconsistent. The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare strategies of noninvasive brain/nerve stimulation for migraine prophylaxis with respect to their effectiveness and acceptability. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, ClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalKey, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were systematically searched to date of June 4th, 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Patients with diagnosis of migraine, either episodic migraine or chronic migraine, were included. All NMA procedures were conducted under the frequentist model. RESULTS: Nineteen RCTs were included (N = 1493; mean age = 38.2 years; 82.0% women). We determined that the high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over C3 yielded the most decreased monthly migraine days among all the interventions [mean difference = − 8.70 days, 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs): − 14.45 to − 2.95 compared to sham/control groups]. Only alternating frequency (2/100 Hz) transcutaneous occipital nerve stimulation (tONS) over the Oz (RR = 0.36, 95%CIs: 0.16 to 0.82) yielded a significantly lower drop-out rate than the sham/control groups did. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provided a new direction for the design of more methodologically robust and larger RCTs based on the findings of the potentially beneficial effect on migraine prophylaxis in participants with migraine by different noninvasive brain/nerve stimulation, especially the application of rTMS and tONS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42021252638. The current study had been approval by the Institutional Review Board of the Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center (TSGHIRB No. B-109-29). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-022-01401-3. Springer Milan 2022-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8903676/ /pubmed/35184742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01401-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Cheng, Yu-Chen Zeng, Bing-Yan Hung, Chao-Ming Su, Kuan-Pin Wu, Yi-Cheng Tu, Yu-Kang Lin, Pao-Yen Stubbs, Brendon Carvalho, Andre F. Liang, Chih-Sung Chen, Tien-Yu Hsu, Chih-Wei Brunoni, Andre R. Suen, Mein-Woei Shiue, Yow-Ling Tseng, Ping-Tao Wu, Ming-Kung Li, Cheng-Ta Effectiveness and acceptability of noninvasive brain and nerve stimulation techniques for migraine prophylaxis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title | Effectiveness and acceptability of noninvasive brain and nerve stimulation techniques for migraine prophylaxis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Effectiveness and acceptability of noninvasive brain and nerve stimulation techniques for migraine prophylaxis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness and acceptability of noninvasive brain and nerve stimulation techniques for migraine prophylaxis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness and acceptability of noninvasive brain and nerve stimulation techniques for migraine prophylaxis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Effectiveness and acceptability of noninvasive brain and nerve stimulation techniques for migraine prophylaxis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | effectiveness and acceptability of noninvasive brain and nerve stimulation techniques for migraine prophylaxis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8903676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35184742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01401-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chengyuchen effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zengbingyan effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT hungchaoming effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT sukuanpin effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wuyicheng effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT tuyukang effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT linpaoyen effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT stubbsbrendon effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT carvalhoandref effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT liangchihsung effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT chentienyu effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT hsuchihwei effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT brunoniandrer effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT suenmeinwoei effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT shiueyowling effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT tsengpingtao effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wumingkung effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT lichengta effectivenessandacceptabilityofnoninvasivebrainandnervestimulationtechniquesformigraineprophylaxisanetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |