Cargando…
Positive signs on physical examination are not always indications for endotracheal tube intubation in patients with facial burn
BACKGROUND: After clinical evaluation in the emergency department (ED), facial burn patients are usually intubated to protect their airways. However, the possibility of unnecessary intubation or delayed intubation after admission exists. Objective criteria for the evaluation of inhalation injury and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8903723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35260094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00594-9 |
_version_ | 1784664830391615488 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Ruo-Yi Chen, Szu-Jen Hsiao, Yen-Chang Kuo, Ling-Wei Liao, Chien-Hung Hsieh, Chi-Hsun Bajani, Francesco Fu, Chih-Yuan |
author_facet | Huang, Ruo-Yi Chen, Szu-Jen Hsiao, Yen-Chang Kuo, Ling-Wei Liao, Chien-Hung Hsieh, Chi-Hsun Bajani, Francesco Fu, Chih-Yuan |
author_sort | Huang, Ruo-Yi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: After clinical evaluation in the emergency department (ED), facial burn patients are usually intubated to protect their airways. However, the possibility of unnecessary intubation or delayed intubation after admission exists. Objective criteria for the evaluation of inhalation injury and the need for airway protection in facial burn patients are needed. METHODS: Facial burn patients between January 2013 and May 2016 were reviewed. Patients who were and were not intubated in the ED were compared. All the intubated patients received routine bronchoscopy and laboratory tests to evaluate whether they had inhalation injuries. The patients with and without confirmed inhalation injuries were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent risk factors for inhalation injuries in the facial burn patients. The reasons for intubation in the patients without inhalation injuries were also investigated. RESULTS: During the study period, 121 patients were intubated in the ED among a total of 335 facial burn patients. Only 73 (60.3%) patients were later confirmed to have inhalation injuries on bronchoscopy. The comparison between the patients with and without inhalation injuries showed that shortness of breath (odds ratio = 3.376, p = 0.027) and high total body surface area (TBSA) (odds ratio = 1.038, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for inhalation injury. Other physical signs (e.g., hoarseness, burned nostril hair, etc.), laboratory examinations and chest X-ray findings were not predictive of inhalation injury in facial burn patients. All the patients with a TBSA over 60% were intubated in the ED even if they did not have inhalation injuries. CONCLUSIONS: In the management of facial burn patients, positive signs on conventional physical examinations may not always be predictive of inhalation injury and the need for endotracheal tube intubation in the ED. More attention should be given to facial burn patients with shortness of breath and a high TBSA. Airway protection is needed in facial burn patients without inhalation injuries because of their associated injuries and treatments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-022-00594-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8903723 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89037232022-03-18 Positive signs on physical examination are not always indications for endotracheal tube intubation in patients with facial burn Huang, Ruo-Yi Chen, Szu-Jen Hsiao, Yen-Chang Kuo, Ling-Wei Liao, Chien-Hung Hsieh, Chi-Hsun Bajani, Francesco Fu, Chih-Yuan BMC Emerg Med Research BACKGROUND: After clinical evaluation in the emergency department (ED), facial burn patients are usually intubated to protect their airways. However, the possibility of unnecessary intubation or delayed intubation after admission exists. Objective criteria for the evaluation of inhalation injury and the need for airway protection in facial burn patients are needed. METHODS: Facial burn patients between January 2013 and May 2016 were reviewed. Patients who were and were not intubated in the ED were compared. All the intubated patients received routine bronchoscopy and laboratory tests to evaluate whether they had inhalation injuries. The patients with and without confirmed inhalation injuries were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent risk factors for inhalation injuries in the facial burn patients. The reasons for intubation in the patients without inhalation injuries were also investigated. RESULTS: During the study period, 121 patients were intubated in the ED among a total of 335 facial burn patients. Only 73 (60.3%) patients were later confirmed to have inhalation injuries on bronchoscopy. The comparison between the patients with and without inhalation injuries showed that shortness of breath (odds ratio = 3.376, p = 0.027) and high total body surface area (TBSA) (odds ratio = 1.038, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for inhalation injury. Other physical signs (e.g., hoarseness, burned nostril hair, etc.), laboratory examinations and chest X-ray findings were not predictive of inhalation injury in facial burn patients. All the patients with a TBSA over 60% were intubated in the ED even if they did not have inhalation injuries. CONCLUSIONS: In the management of facial burn patients, positive signs on conventional physical examinations may not always be predictive of inhalation injury and the need for endotracheal tube intubation in the ED. More attention should be given to facial burn patients with shortness of breath and a high TBSA. Airway protection is needed in facial burn patients without inhalation injuries because of their associated injuries and treatments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-022-00594-9. BioMed Central 2022-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8903723/ /pubmed/35260094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00594-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Huang, Ruo-Yi Chen, Szu-Jen Hsiao, Yen-Chang Kuo, Ling-Wei Liao, Chien-Hung Hsieh, Chi-Hsun Bajani, Francesco Fu, Chih-Yuan Positive signs on physical examination are not always indications for endotracheal tube intubation in patients with facial burn |
title | Positive signs on physical examination are not always indications for endotracheal tube intubation in patients with facial burn |
title_full | Positive signs on physical examination are not always indications for endotracheal tube intubation in patients with facial burn |
title_fullStr | Positive signs on physical examination are not always indications for endotracheal tube intubation in patients with facial burn |
title_full_unstemmed | Positive signs on physical examination are not always indications for endotracheal tube intubation in patients with facial burn |
title_short | Positive signs on physical examination are not always indications for endotracheal tube intubation in patients with facial burn |
title_sort | positive signs on physical examination are not always indications for endotracheal tube intubation in patients with facial burn |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8903723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35260094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00594-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangruoyi positivesignsonphysicalexaminationarenotalwaysindicationsforendotrachealtubeintubationinpatientswithfacialburn AT chenszujen positivesignsonphysicalexaminationarenotalwaysindicationsforendotrachealtubeintubationinpatientswithfacialburn AT hsiaoyenchang positivesignsonphysicalexaminationarenotalwaysindicationsforendotrachealtubeintubationinpatientswithfacialburn AT kuolingwei positivesignsonphysicalexaminationarenotalwaysindicationsforendotrachealtubeintubationinpatientswithfacialburn AT liaochienhung positivesignsonphysicalexaminationarenotalwaysindicationsforendotrachealtubeintubationinpatientswithfacialburn AT hsiehchihsun positivesignsonphysicalexaminationarenotalwaysindicationsforendotrachealtubeintubationinpatientswithfacialburn AT bajanifrancesco positivesignsonphysicalexaminationarenotalwaysindicationsforendotrachealtubeintubationinpatientswithfacialburn AT fuchihyuan positivesignsonphysicalexaminationarenotalwaysindicationsforendotrachealtubeintubationinpatientswithfacialburn |