Cargando…

Positive signs on physical examination are not always indications for endotracheal tube intubation in patients with facial burn

BACKGROUND: After clinical evaluation in the emergency department (ED), facial burn patients are usually intubated to protect their airways. However, the possibility of unnecessary intubation or delayed intubation after admission exists. Objective criteria for the evaluation of inhalation injury and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Ruo-Yi, Chen, Szu-Jen, Hsiao, Yen-Chang, Kuo, Ling-Wei, Liao, Chien-Hung, Hsieh, Chi-Hsun, Bajani, Francesco, Fu, Chih-Yuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8903723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35260094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00594-9
_version_ 1784664830391615488
author Huang, Ruo-Yi
Chen, Szu-Jen
Hsiao, Yen-Chang
Kuo, Ling-Wei
Liao, Chien-Hung
Hsieh, Chi-Hsun
Bajani, Francesco
Fu, Chih-Yuan
author_facet Huang, Ruo-Yi
Chen, Szu-Jen
Hsiao, Yen-Chang
Kuo, Ling-Wei
Liao, Chien-Hung
Hsieh, Chi-Hsun
Bajani, Francesco
Fu, Chih-Yuan
author_sort Huang, Ruo-Yi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: After clinical evaluation in the emergency department (ED), facial burn patients are usually intubated to protect their airways. However, the possibility of unnecessary intubation or delayed intubation after admission exists. Objective criteria for the evaluation of inhalation injury and the need for airway protection in facial burn patients are needed. METHODS: Facial burn patients between January 2013 and May 2016 were reviewed. Patients who were and were not intubated in the ED were compared. All the intubated patients received routine bronchoscopy and laboratory tests to evaluate whether they had inhalation injuries. The patients with and without confirmed inhalation injuries were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent risk factors for inhalation injuries in the facial burn patients. The reasons for intubation in the patients without inhalation injuries were also investigated. RESULTS: During the study period, 121 patients were intubated in the ED among a total of 335 facial burn patients. Only 73 (60.3%) patients were later confirmed to have inhalation injuries on bronchoscopy. The comparison between the patients with and without inhalation injuries showed that shortness of breath (odds ratio = 3.376, p = 0.027) and high total body surface area (TBSA) (odds ratio = 1.038, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for inhalation injury. Other physical signs (e.g., hoarseness, burned nostril hair, etc.), laboratory examinations and chest X-ray findings were not predictive of inhalation injury in facial burn patients. All the patients with a TBSA over 60% were intubated in the ED even if they did not have inhalation injuries. CONCLUSIONS: In the management of facial burn patients, positive signs on conventional physical examinations may not always be predictive of inhalation injury and the need for endotracheal tube intubation in the ED. More attention should be given to facial burn patients with shortness of breath and a high TBSA. Airway protection is needed in facial burn patients without inhalation injuries because of their associated injuries and treatments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-022-00594-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8903723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89037232022-03-18 Positive signs on physical examination are not always indications for endotracheal tube intubation in patients with facial burn Huang, Ruo-Yi Chen, Szu-Jen Hsiao, Yen-Chang Kuo, Ling-Wei Liao, Chien-Hung Hsieh, Chi-Hsun Bajani, Francesco Fu, Chih-Yuan BMC Emerg Med Research BACKGROUND: After clinical evaluation in the emergency department (ED), facial burn patients are usually intubated to protect their airways. However, the possibility of unnecessary intubation or delayed intubation after admission exists. Objective criteria for the evaluation of inhalation injury and the need for airway protection in facial burn patients are needed. METHODS: Facial burn patients between January 2013 and May 2016 were reviewed. Patients who were and were not intubated in the ED were compared. All the intubated patients received routine bronchoscopy and laboratory tests to evaluate whether they had inhalation injuries. The patients with and without confirmed inhalation injuries were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent risk factors for inhalation injuries in the facial burn patients. The reasons for intubation in the patients without inhalation injuries were also investigated. RESULTS: During the study period, 121 patients were intubated in the ED among a total of 335 facial burn patients. Only 73 (60.3%) patients were later confirmed to have inhalation injuries on bronchoscopy. The comparison between the patients with and without inhalation injuries showed that shortness of breath (odds ratio = 3.376, p = 0.027) and high total body surface area (TBSA) (odds ratio = 1.038, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for inhalation injury. Other physical signs (e.g., hoarseness, burned nostril hair, etc.), laboratory examinations and chest X-ray findings were not predictive of inhalation injury in facial burn patients. All the patients with a TBSA over 60% were intubated in the ED even if they did not have inhalation injuries. CONCLUSIONS: In the management of facial burn patients, positive signs on conventional physical examinations may not always be predictive of inhalation injury and the need for endotracheal tube intubation in the ED. More attention should be given to facial burn patients with shortness of breath and a high TBSA. Airway protection is needed in facial burn patients without inhalation injuries because of their associated injuries and treatments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-022-00594-9. BioMed Central 2022-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8903723/ /pubmed/35260094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00594-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Huang, Ruo-Yi
Chen, Szu-Jen
Hsiao, Yen-Chang
Kuo, Ling-Wei
Liao, Chien-Hung
Hsieh, Chi-Hsun
Bajani, Francesco
Fu, Chih-Yuan
Positive signs on physical examination are not always indications for endotracheal tube intubation in patients with facial burn
title Positive signs on physical examination are not always indications for endotracheal tube intubation in patients with facial burn
title_full Positive signs on physical examination are not always indications for endotracheal tube intubation in patients with facial burn
title_fullStr Positive signs on physical examination are not always indications for endotracheal tube intubation in patients with facial burn
title_full_unstemmed Positive signs on physical examination are not always indications for endotracheal tube intubation in patients with facial burn
title_short Positive signs on physical examination are not always indications for endotracheal tube intubation in patients with facial burn
title_sort positive signs on physical examination are not always indications for endotracheal tube intubation in patients with facial burn
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8903723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35260094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00594-9
work_keys_str_mv AT huangruoyi positivesignsonphysicalexaminationarenotalwaysindicationsforendotrachealtubeintubationinpatientswithfacialburn
AT chenszujen positivesignsonphysicalexaminationarenotalwaysindicationsforendotrachealtubeintubationinpatientswithfacialburn
AT hsiaoyenchang positivesignsonphysicalexaminationarenotalwaysindicationsforendotrachealtubeintubationinpatientswithfacialburn
AT kuolingwei positivesignsonphysicalexaminationarenotalwaysindicationsforendotrachealtubeintubationinpatientswithfacialburn
AT liaochienhung positivesignsonphysicalexaminationarenotalwaysindicationsforendotrachealtubeintubationinpatientswithfacialburn
AT hsiehchihsun positivesignsonphysicalexaminationarenotalwaysindicationsforendotrachealtubeintubationinpatientswithfacialburn
AT bajanifrancesco positivesignsonphysicalexaminationarenotalwaysindicationsforendotrachealtubeintubationinpatientswithfacialburn
AT fuchihyuan positivesignsonphysicalexaminationarenotalwaysindicationsforendotrachealtubeintubationinpatientswithfacialburn