Cargando…

Erector Spinae Plane Block in Abdominal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Abdominal surgery is one of the most definitive and mainstay treatment options for abdominal pathologies in clinical practice. Acute postoperative pain is a major challenge in the postoperative period. Although opioids are commonly used for analgesia after major abdominal surgeries, they...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Viderman, Dmitriy, Aubakirova, Mina, Abdildin, Yerkin G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8904394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35280917
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.812531
_version_ 1784664938313154560
author Viderman, Dmitriy
Aubakirova, Mina
Abdildin, Yerkin G.
author_facet Viderman, Dmitriy
Aubakirova, Mina
Abdildin, Yerkin G.
author_sort Viderman, Dmitriy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Abdominal surgery is one of the most definitive and mainstay treatment options for abdominal pathologies in clinical practice. Acute postoperative pain is a major challenge in the postoperative period. Although opioids are commonly used for analgesia after major abdominal surgeries, they can lead to side effects, such as nausea and vomiting, constipation, pruritus, and life-threatening respiratory depression. Regional anesthetic techniques are commonly used to prevent or minimize these side effects. The objective of this meta-analysis is to assess the effectiveness of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and standard medical (no block) pain management after major abdominal surgeries. METHODS: We searched for articles reporting the results of randomized controlled trials on ESPB and no block in pain control published before May 2021. RESULTS: The systematic search initially yielded 56 publications, 49 articles were excluded, and seven randomized clinical trials were included and analyzed. We extracted the data on postoperative opioid consumption, the efficacy of pain relief, time to the first opioid demand, and the rate of postoperative complications in the ESPB group and no block group. CONCLUSIONS: Opioid requirement and time to first analgesic request were significantly reduced in the ultrasound-guided ESPB group, but pain scores, nausea, and vomiting did not differ significantly after pooling the results of the block and no block studies. There were no reports on serious complications related to ESPB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8904394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89043942022-03-10 Erector Spinae Plane Block in Abdominal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis Viderman, Dmitriy Aubakirova, Mina Abdildin, Yerkin G. Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Abdominal surgery is one of the most definitive and mainstay treatment options for abdominal pathologies in clinical practice. Acute postoperative pain is a major challenge in the postoperative period. Although opioids are commonly used for analgesia after major abdominal surgeries, they can lead to side effects, such as nausea and vomiting, constipation, pruritus, and life-threatening respiratory depression. Regional anesthetic techniques are commonly used to prevent or minimize these side effects. The objective of this meta-analysis is to assess the effectiveness of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and standard medical (no block) pain management after major abdominal surgeries. METHODS: We searched for articles reporting the results of randomized controlled trials on ESPB and no block in pain control published before May 2021. RESULTS: The systematic search initially yielded 56 publications, 49 articles were excluded, and seven randomized clinical trials were included and analyzed. We extracted the data on postoperative opioid consumption, the efficacy of pain relief, time to the first opioid demand, and the rate of postoperative complications in the ESPB group and no block group. CONCLUSIONS: Opioid requirement and time to first analgesic request were significantly reduced in the ultrasound-guided ESPB group, but pain scores, nausea, and vomiting did not differ significantly after pooling the results of the block and no block studies. There were no reports on serious complications related to ESPB. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8904394/ /pubmed/35280917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.812531 Text en Copyright © 2022 Viderman, Aubakirova and Abdildin. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Viderman, Dmitriy
Aubakirova, Mina
Abdildin, Yerkin G.
Erector Spinae Plane Block in Abdominal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis
title Erector Spinae Plane Block in Abdominal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Erector Spinae Plane Block in Abdominal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Erector Spinae Plane Block in Abdominal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Erector Spinae Plane Block in Abdominal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Erector Spinae Plane Block in Abdominal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort erector spinae plane block in abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8904394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35280917
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.812531
work_keys_str_mv AT vidermandmitriy erectorspinaeplaneblockinabdominalsurgeryametaanalysis
AT aubakirovamina erectorspinaeplaneblockinabdominalsurgeryametaanalysis
AT abdildinyerking erectorspinaeplaneblockinabdominalsurgeryametaanalysis