Cargando…

The People’s Trial: supporting the public’s understanding of randomised trials

BACKGROUND: Randomised trials are considered the gold standard in providing robust evidence on the effectiveness of interventions. However, there are relatively few initiatives to help increase public understanding of what randomised trials are and why they are important. This limits the overall acc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Finucane, Elaine, O’Brien, Ann, Treweek, Shaun, Newell, John, Das, Kishor, Chapman, Sarah, Wicks, Paul, Galvin, Sandra, Healy, Patricia, Biesty, Linda, Gillies, Katie, Noel-Storr, Anna, Gardner, Heidi, O’Reilly, Mary Frances, Devane, Declan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8905031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35264220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05984-1
_version_ 1784665100447121408
author Finucane, Elaine
O’Brien, Ann
Treweek, Shaun
Newell, John
Das, Kishor
Chapman, Sarah
Wicks, Paul
Galvin, Sandra
Healy, Patricia
Biesty, Linda
Gillies, Katie
Noel-Storr, Anna
Gardner, Heidi
O’Reilly, Mary Frances
Devane, Declan
author_facet Finucane, Elaine
O’Brien, Ann
Treweek, Shaun
Newell, John
Das, Kishor
Chapman, Sarah
Wicks, Paul
Galvin, Sandra
Healy, Patricia
Biesty, Linda
Gillies, Katie
Noel-Storr, Anna
Gardner, Heidi
O’Reilly, Mary Frances
Devane, Declan
author_sort Finucane, Elaine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Randomised trials are considered the gold standard in providing robust evidence on the effectiveness of interventions. However, there are relatively few initiatives to help increase public understanding of what randomised trials are and why they are important. This limits the overall acceptance of and public participation in clinical trials. The People’s Trial aims to help the public learn about randomised trials, to understand why they matter, and to be better equipped to think critically about health claims by actively involving them in all aspects of trial design. This was done by involving the public in the design, conduct, and dissemination of a randomised trial. METHODS: Using a reflexive approach, we describe the processes of development, conduct, and dissemination of The People’s Trial. RESULTS: Over 3000 members of the public, from 72 countries, participated in The People’s Trial. Through a series of online surveys, the public designed a trial called The Reading Trial. They chose the question the trial would try to answer and decided the components of the trial question. In December 2019, 991 participants were recruited to a trial to answer the question identified and prioritised by the public, i.e. ‘Does reading a book in bed make a difference to sleep in comparison with not reading a book in bed?’ We report the processes of The People’s Trial in seven phases, paralleling the steps of a randomised trial, i.e. question identification and prioritisation, recruitment, randomisation, trial conduct, data analysis, and sharing of findings. We describe the decisions we made, the processes we used, the challenges we encountered, and the lessons we learned. CONCLUSION: The People’s Trial involved the public successfully in the design, conduct, and dissemination of a randomised trial demonstrating the potential for such initiatives to help the public learn about randomised trials, to understand why they matter, and to be better equipped to think critically about health claims. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04185818. Registered on 4 December 2019 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05984-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8905031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89050312022-03-09 The People’s Trial: supporting the public’s understanding of randomised trials Finucane, Elaine O’Brien, Ann Treweek, Shaun Newell, John Das, Kishor Chapman, Sarah Wicks, Paul Galvin, Sandra Healy, Patricia Biesty, Linda Gillies, Katie Noel-Storr, Anna Gardner, Heidi O’Reilly, Mary Frances Devane, Declan Trials Research BACKGROUND: Randomised trials are considered the gold standard in providing robust evidence on the effectiveness of interventions. However, there are relatively few initiatives to help increase public understanding of what randomised trials are and why they are important. This limits the overall acceptance of and public participation in clinical trials. The People’s Trial aims to help the public learn about randomised trials, to understand why they matter, and to be better equipped to think critically about health claims by actively involving them in all aspects of trial design. This was done by involving the public in the design, conduct, and dissemination of a randomised trial. METHODS: Using a reflexive approach, we describe the processes of development, conduct, and dissemination of The People’s Trial. RESULTS: Over 3000 members of the public, from 72 countries, participated in The People’s Trial. Through a series of online surveys, the public designed a trial called The Reading Trial. They chose the question the trial would try to answer and decided the components of the trial question. In December 2019, 991 participants were recruited to a trial to answer the question identified and prioritised by the public, i.e. ‘Does reading a book in bed make a difference to sleep in comparison with not reading a book in bed?’ We report the processes of The People’s Trial in seven phases, paralleling the steps of a randomised trial, i.e. question identification and prioritisation, recruitment, randomisation, trial conduct, data analysis, and sharing of findings. We describe the decisions we made, the processes we used, the challenges we encountered, and the lessons we learned. CONCLUSION: The People’s Trial involved the public successfully in the design, conduct, and dissemination of a randomised trial demonstrating the potential for such initiatives to help the public learn about randomised trials, to understand why they matter, and to be better equipped to think critically about health claims. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04185818. Registered on 4 December 2019 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05984-1. BioMed Central 2022-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8905031/ /pubmed/35264220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05984-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Finucane, Elaine
O’Brien, Ann
Treweek, Shaun
Newell, John
Das, Kishor
Chapman, Sarah
Wicks, Paul
Galvin, Sandra
Healy, Patricia
Biesty, Linda
Gillies, Katie
Noel-Storr, Anna
Gardner, Heidi
O’Reilly, Mary Frances
Devane, Declan
The People’s Trial: supporting the public’s understanding of randomised trials
title The People’s Trial: supporting the public’s understanding of randomised trials
title_full The People’s Trial: supporting the public’s understanding of randomised trials
title_fullStr The People’s Trial: supporting the public’s understanding of randomised trials
title_full_unstemmed The People’s Trial: supporting the public’s understanding of randomised trials
title_short The People’s Trial: supporting the public’s understanding of randomised trials
title_sort people’s trial: supporting the public’s understanding of randomised trials
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8905031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35264220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05984-1
work_keys_str_mv AT finucaneelaine thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT obrienann thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT treweekshaun thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT newelljohn thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT daskishor thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT chapmansarah thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT wickspaul thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT galvinsandra thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT healypatricia thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT biestylinda thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT gillieskatie thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT noelstorranna thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT gardnerheidi thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT oreillymaryfrances thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT devanedeclan thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT finucaneelaine peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT obrienann peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT treweekshaun peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT newelljohn peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT daskishor peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT chapmansarah peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT wickspaul peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT galvinsandra peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT healypatricia peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT biestylinda peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT gillieskatie peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT noelstorranna peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT gardnerheidi peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT oreillymaryfrances peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials
AT devanedeclan peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials