Cargando…
The People’s Trial: supporting the public’s understanding of randomised trials
BACKGROUND: Randomised trials are considered the gold standard in providing robust evidence on the effectiveness of interventions. However, there are relatively few initiatives to help increase public understanding of what randomised trials are and why they are important. This limits the overall acc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8905031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35264220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05984-1 |
_version_ | 1784665100447121408 |
---|---|
author | Finucane, Elaine O’Brien, Ann Treweek, Shaun Newell, John Das, Kishor Chapman, Sarah Wicks, Paul Galvin, Sandra Healy, Patricia Biesty, Linda Gillies, Katie Noel-Storr, Anna Gardner, Heidi O’Reilly, Mary Frances Devane, Declan |
author_facet | Finucane, Elaine O’Brien, Ann Treweek, Shaun Newell, John Das, Kishor Chapman, Sarah Wicks, Paul Galvin, Sandra Healy, Patricia Biesty, Linda Gillies, Katie Noel-Storr, Anna Gardner, Heidi O’Reilly, Mary Frances Devane, Declan |
author_sort | Finucane, Elaine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Randomised trials are considered the gold standard in providing robust evidence on the effectiveness of interventions. However, there are relatively few initiatives to help increase public understanding of what randomised trials are and why they are important. This limits the overall acceptance of and public participation in clinical trials. The People’s Trial aims to help the public learn about randomised trials, to understand why they matter, and to be better equipped to think critically about health claims by actively involving them in all aspects of trial design. This was done by involving the public in the design, conduct, and dissemination of a randomised trial. METHODS: Using a reflexive approach, we describe the processes of development, conduct, and dissemination of The People’s Trial. RESULTS: Over 3000 members of the public, from 72 countries, participated in The People’s Trial. Through a series of online surveys, the public designed a trial called The Reading Trial. They chose the question the trial would try to answer and decided the components of the trial question. In December 2019, 991 participants were recruited to a trial to answer the question identified and prioritised by the public, i.e. ‘Does reading a book in bed make a difference to sleep in comparison with not reading a book in bed?’ We report the processes of The People’s Trial in seven phases, paralleling the steps of a randomised trial, i.e. question identification and prioritisation, recruitment, randomisation, trial conduct, data analysis, and sharing of findings. We describe the decisions we made, the processes we used, the challenges we encountered, and the lessons we learned. CONCLUSION: The People’s Trial involved the public successfully in the design, conduct, and dissemination of a randomised trial demonstrating the potential for such initiatives to help the public learn about randomised trials, to understand why they matter, and to be better equipped to think critically about health claims. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04185818. Registered on 4 December 2019 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05984-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8905031 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89050312022-03-09 The People’s Trial: supporting the public’s understanding of randomised trials Finucane, Elaine O’Brien, Ann Treweek, Shaun Newell, John Das, Kishor Chapman, Sarah Wicks, Paul Galvin, Sandra Healy, Patricia Biesty, Linda Gillies, Katie Noel-Storr, Anna Gardner, Heidi O’Reilly, Mary Frances Devane, Declan Trials Research BACKGROUND: Randomised trials are considered the gold standard in providing robust evidence on the effectiveness of interventions. However, there are relatively few initiatives to help increase public understanding of what randomised trials are and why they are important. This limits the overall acceptance of and public participation in clinical trials. The People’s Trial aims to help the public learn about randomised trials, to understand why they matter, and to be better equipped to think critically about health claims by actively involving them in all aspects of trial design. This was done by involving the public in the design, conduct, and dissemination of a randomised trial. METHODS: Using a reflexive approach, we describe the processes of development, conduct, and dissemination of The People’s Trial. RESULTS: Over 3000 members of the public, from 72 countries, participated in The People’s Trial. Through a series of online surveys, the public designed a trial called The Reading Trial. They chose the question the trial would try to answer and decided the components of the trial question. In December 2019, 991 participants were recruited to a trial to answer the question identified and prioritised by the public, i.e. ‘Does reading a book in bed make a difference to sleep in comparison with not reading a book in bed?’ We report the processes of The People’s Trial in seven phases, paralleling the steps of a randomised trial, i.e. question identification and prioritisation, recruitment, randomisation, trial conduct, data analysis, and sharing of findings. We describe the decisions we made, the processes we used, the challenges we encountered, and the lessons we learned. CONCLUSION: The People’s Trial involved the public successfully in the design, conduct, and dissemination of a randomised trial demonstrating the potential for such initiatives to help the public learn about randomised trials, to understand why they matter, and to be better equipped to think critically about health claims. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04185818. Registered on 4 December 2019 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05984-1. BioMed Central 2022-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8905031/ /pubmed/35264220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05984-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Finucane, Elaine O’Brien, Ann Treweek, Shaun Newell, John Das, Kishor Chapman, Sarah Wicks, Paul Galvin, Sandra Healy, Patricia Biesty, Linda Gillies, Katie Noel-Storr, Anna Gardner, Heidi O’Reilly, Mary Frances Devane, Declan The People’s Trial: supporting the public’s understanding of randomised trials |
title | The People’s Trial: supporting the public’s understanding of randomised trials |
title_full | The People’s Trial: supporting the public’s understanding of randomised trials |
title_fullStr | The People’s Trial: supporting the public’s understanding of randomised trials |
title_full_unstemmed | The People’s Trial: supporting the public’s understanding of randomised trials |
title_short | The People’s Trial: supporting the public’s understanding of randomised trials |
title_sort | people’s trial: supporting the public’s understanding of randomised trials |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8905031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35264220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05984-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT finucaneelaine thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT obrienann thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT treweekshaun thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT newelljohn thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT daskishor thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT chapmansarah thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT wickspaul thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT galvinsandra thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT healypatricia thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT biestylinda thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT gillieskatie thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT noelstorranna thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT gardnerheidi thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT oreillymaryfrances thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT devanedeclan thepeoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT finucaneelaine peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT obrienann peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT treweekshaun peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT newelljohn peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT daskishor peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT chapmansarah peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT wickspaul peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT galvinsandra peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT healypatricia peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT biestylinda peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT gillieskatie peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT noelstorranna peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT gardnerheidi peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT oreillymaryfrances peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials AT devanedeclan peoplestrialsupportingthepublicsunderstandingofrandomisedtrials |