Cargando…

Nickel and cobalt: Underestimated contact allergens in hairdressers?

Introduction: Nickel and cobalt were not regarded as pertinent contact allergens in the hairdressing trade for the last decades. It was even stated that the relevance of nickel allergy in the hairdressing trade has been overestimated for several years. Recently, nickel and cobalt release from a mult...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Symanzik, Cara, Skudlik, Christoph, John, Swen Malte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8905071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35285604
http://dx.doi.org/10.5414/ALXDB413E
_version_ 1784665113002770432
author Symanzik, Cara
Skudlik, Christoph
John, Swen Malte
author_facet Symanzik, Cara
Skudlik, Christoph
John, Swen Malte
author_sort Symanzik, Cara
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Nickel and cobalt were not regarded as pertinent contact allergens in the hairdressing trade for the last decades. It was even stated that the relevance of nickel allergy in the hairdressing trade has been overestimated for several years. Recently, nickel and cobalt release from a multitude of metal tools in the German hairdressing trade was documented in two field studies. Methods: Review of two field studies. Results: In 2019, nickel release from 9.2% of 229 tested metallic hairdressing tools was evidenced, and in 2021, nickel release from 27.6% as well as cobalt release from 2.1% of 475 tested tools was detected in overall 30 North German hairdressing salons. Tweezers, sectioning clips, hair clips, and straight razors were identified as nickel as well as cobalt releasing tools. Crochet hooks and tail combs were identified as only nickel releasing tools. Discussion: A variety of metallic tools – which are used daily by hairdressers – release nickel and/or cobalt in allergologically relevant amounts. This circumstance has to be considered problematic with regard to the development of work-related allergic contact dermatitis. Thus, nickel and cobalt should possibly receive greater attention as potential contact allergens in the hairdressing trade. Conclusion: The proven nickel and cobalt release from metallic hairdressing tools might entail legal ramifications in terms of insurance law. In case of nickel and cobalt allergies within the occupational group of hairdressers, metal tools might be considered as feasible sources for nickel and cobalt exposure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8905071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89050712022-03-09 Nickel and cobalt: Underestimated contact allergens in hairdressers? Symanzik, Cara Skudlik, Christoph John, Swen Malte Allergol Select Research Article Introduction: Nickel and cobalt were not regarded as pertinent contact allergens in the hairdressing trade for the last decades. It was even stated that the relevance of nickel allergy in the hairdressing trade has been overestimated for several years. Recently, nickel and cobalt release from a multitude of metal tools in the German hairdressing trade was documented in two field studies. Methods: Review of two field studies. Results: In 2019, nickel release from 9.2% of 229 tested metallic hairdressing tools was evidenced, and in 2021, nickel release from 27.6% as well as cobalt release from 2.1% of 475 tested tools was detected in overall 30 North German hairdressing salons. Tweezers, sectioning clips, hair clips, and straight razors were identified as nickel as well as cobalt releasing tools. Crochet hooks and tail combs were identified as only nickel releasing tools. Discussion: A variety of metallic tools – which are used daily by hairdressers – release nickel and/or cobalt in allergologically relevant amounts. This circumstance has to be considered problematic with regard to the development of work-related allergic contact dermatitis. Thus, nickel and cobalt should possibly receive greater attention as potential contact allergens in the hairdressing trade. Conclusion: The proven nickel and cobalt release from metallic hairdressing tools might entail legal ramifications in terms of insurance law. In case of nickel and cobalt allergies within the occupational group of hairdressers, metal tools might be considered as feasible sources for nickel and cobalt exposure. Dustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle 2022-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8905071/ /pubmed/35285604 http://dx.doi.org/10.5414/ALXDB413E Text en © Dustri-Verlag Dr. K. Feistle https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Symanzik, Cara
Skudlik, Christoph
John, Swen Malte
Nickel and cobalt: Underestimated contact allergens in hairdressers?
title Nickel and cobalt: Underestimated contact allergens in hairdressers?
title_full Nickel and cobalt: Underestimated contact allergens in hairdressers?
title_fullStr Nickel and cobalt: Underestimated contact allergens in hairdressers?
title_full_unstemmed Nickel and cobalt: Underestimated contact allergens in hairdressers?
title_short Nickel and cobalt: Underestimated contact allergens in hairdressers?
title_sort nickel and cobalt: underestimated contact allergens in hairdressers?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8905071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35285604
http://dx.doi.org/10.5414/ALXDB413E
work_keys_str_mv AT symanzikcara nickelandcobaltunderestimatedcontactallergensinhairdressers
AT skudlikchristoph nickelandcobaltunderestimatedcontactallergensinhairdressers
AT johnswenmalte nickelandcobaltunderestimatedcontactallergensinhairdressers