Cargando…
Gesture is the primary modality for language creation
How language began is one of the oldest questions in science, but theories remain speculative due to a lack of direct evidence. Here, we report two experiments that generate empirical evidence to inform gesture-first and vocal-first theories of language origin; in each, we tested modern humans'...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8905156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35259991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.0066 |
_version_ | 1784665128690515968 |
---|---|
author | Fay, Nicolas Walker, Bradley Ellison, T. Mark Blundell, Zachary De Kleine, Naomi Garde, Murray Lister, Casey J. Goldin-Meadow, Susan |
author_facet | Fay, Nicolas Walker, Bradley Ellison, T. Mark Blundell, Zachary De Kleine, Naomi Garde, Murray Lister, Casey J. Goldin-Meadow, Susan |
author_sort | Fay, Nicolas |
collection | PubMed |
description | How language began is one of the oldest questions in science, but theories remain speculative due to a lack of direct evidence. Here, we report two experiments that generate empirical evidence to inform gesture-first and vocal-first theories of language origin; in each, we tested modern humans' ability to communicate a range of meanings (995 distinct words) using either gesture or non-linguistic vocalization. Experiment 1 is a cross-cultural study, with signal Producers sampled from Australia (n = 30, M(age) = 32.63, s.d. = 12.42) and Vanuatu (n = 30, M(age) = 32.40, s.d. = 11.76). Experiment 2 is a cross-experiential study in which Producers were either sighted (n = 10, M(age) = 39.60, s.d. = 11.18) or severely vision-impaired (n = 10, M(age) = 39.40, s.d. = 10.37). A group of undergraduate student Interpreters guessed the meaning of the signals created by the Producers (n = 140). Communication success was substantially higher in the gesture modality than the vocal modality (twice as high overall; 61.17% versus 29.04% success). This was true within cultures, across cultures and even for the signals produced by severely vision-impaired participants. The success of gesture is attributed in part to its greater universality (i.e. similarity in form across different Producers). Our results support the hypothesis that gesture is the primary modality for language creation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8905156 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89051562022-03-11 Gesture is the primary modality for language creation Fay, Nicolas Walker, Bradley Ellison, T. Mark Blundell, Zachary De Kleine, Naomi Garde, Murray Lister, Casey J. Goldin-Meadow, Susan Proc Biol Sci Behaviour How language began is one of the oldest questions in science, but theories remain speculative due to a lack of direct evidence. Here, we report two experiments that generate empirical evidence to inform gesture-first and vocal-first theories of language origin; in each, we tested modern humans' ability to communicate a range of meanings (995 distinct words) using either gesture or non-linguistic vocalization. Experiment 1 is a cross-cultural study, with signal Producers sampled from Australia (n = 30, M(age) = 32.63, s.d. = 12.42) and Vanuatu (n = 30, M(age) = 32.40, s.d. = 11.76). Experiment 2 is a cross-experiential study in which Producers were either sighted (n = 10, M(age) = 39.60, s.d. = 11.18) or severely vision-impaired (n = 10, M(age) = 39.40, s.d. = 10.37). A group of undergraduate student Interpreters guessed the meaning of the signals created by the Producers (n = 140). Communication success was substantially higher in the gesture modality than the vocal modality (twice as high overall; 61.17% versus 29.04% success). This was true within cultures, across cultures and even for the signals produced by severely vision-impaired participants. The success of gesture is attributed in part to its greater universality (i.e. similarity in form across different Producers). Our results support the hypothesis that gesture is the primary modality for language creation. The Royal Society 2022-03-09 2022-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8905156/ /pubmed/35259991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.0066 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Behaviour Fay, Nicolas Walker, Bradley Ellison, T. Mark Blundell, Zachary De Kleine, Naomi Garde, Murray Lister, Casey J. Goldin-Meadow, Susan Gesture is the primary modality for language creation |
title | Gesture is the primary modality for language creation |
title_full | Gesture is the primary modality for language creation |
title_fullStr | Gesture is the primary modality for language creation |
title_full_unstemmed | Gesture is the primary modality for language creation |
title_short | Gesture is the primary modality for language creation |
title_sort | gesture is the primary modality for language creation |
topic | Behaviour |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8905156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35259991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.0066 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT faynicolas gestureistheprimarymodalityforlanguagecreation AT walkerbradley gestureistheprimarymodalityforlanguagecreation AT ellisontmark gestureistheprimarymodalityforlanguagecreation AT blundellzachary gestureistheprimarymodalityforlanguagecreation AT dekleinenaomi gestureistheprimarymodalityforlanguagecreation AT gardemurray gestureistheprimarymodalityforlanguagecreation AT listercaseyj gestureistheprimarymodalityforlanguagecreation AT goldinmeadowsusan gestureistheprimarymodalityforlanguagecreation |