Cargando…
Peritransplantation ruxolitinib administration is safe and effective in patients with myelofibrosis: a pilot open-label study
We report results of our prospective pilot trial evaluating safety/feasibility of peritransplantation ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis treatment. Primary objectives were to determine safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ruxolitinib. Ruxolitinib was administered at 2 dose levels (DLs) of 5 and 10...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society of Hematology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8905711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34581764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005035 |
_version_ | 1784665249835646976 |
---|---|
author | Ali, Haris Tsai, Ni-Chun Synold, Timothy Mokhtari, Sally Tsia, Weimin Palmer, Joycelynne Stiller, Tracey Al Malki, Monzr Aldoss, Ibrahim Salhotra, Amandeep Rahmanuddin, Syed Pullarkat, Vinod Cai, Ji-Lian Stein, Anthony Forman, Stephen J. Marcucci, Guido Mei, Matthew Snyder, David S. Nakamura, Ryotaro |
author_facet | Ali, Haris Tsai, Ni-Chun Synold, Timothy Mokhtari, Sally Tsia, Weimin Palmer, Joycelynne Stiller, Tracey Al Malki, Monzr Aldoss, Ibrahim Salhotra, Amandeep Rahmanuddin, Syed Pullarkat, Vinod Cai, Ji-Lian Stein, Anthony Forman, Stephen J. Marcucci, Guido Mei, Matthew Snyder, David S. Nakamura, Ryotaro |
author_sort | Ali, Haris |
collection | PubMed |
description | We report results of our prospective pilot trial evaluating safety/feasibility of peritransplantation ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis treatment. Primary objectives were to determine safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ruxolitinib. Ruxolitinib was administered at 2 dose levels (DLs) of 5 and 10 mg twice daily, with fludarabine/melphalan conditioning regimen and tacrolimus/sirolimus graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. We enrolled 6 and 12 patients at DL1 and DL2, respectively. Median age at transplantation was 65 years (range, 25-73). Per Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System, 4 patients were high and 14 intermediate risk. Peripheral blood stem cells were graft source from matched sibling (n = 5) or unrelated (n = 13) donor. At each DL, 1 patient developed dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs): grade 3 cardiac and gastrointestinal with grade 4 pulmonary DLTs in DL1, and grade 3 kidney injury in DL2. All patients achieved engraftment. Grade 2 to 4 and 3 to 4 acute GVHD cumulative incidence was 17% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6-47) and 11% (95% CI, 3-41), respectively. Cumulative incidence of 1-year chronic GVHD was 42% (95% CI, 24-74). With 22.6-month (range, 6.2-25.8) median follow-up in surviving patients, 1-year overall and progression-free survival were 77% (95% CI, 50-91) and 71% (95% CI, 44-87), respectively. Causes of death (n = 4) were cardiac arrest, GVHD, respiratory failure, and refractory GVHD of liver. Our results show peritransplantation ruxolitinib is safe and well tolerated at MTD of 10 mg twice daily and associated with dose-dependent pharmacokinetic and cytokine profile. Early efficacy data are highly promising in high-risk older patients with myelofibrosis. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02917096. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8905711 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Society of Hematology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89057112022-03-09 Peritransplantation ruxolitinib administration is safe and effective in patients with myelofibrosis: a pilot open-label study Ali, Haris Tsai, Ni-Chun Synold, Timothy Mokhtari, Sally Tsia, Weimin Palmer, Joycelynne Stiller, Tracey Al Malki, Monzr Aldoss, Ibrahim Salhotra, Amandeep Rahmanuddin, Syed Pullarkat, Vinod Cai, Ji-Lian Stein, Anthony Forman, Stephen J. Marcucci, Guido Mei, Matthew Snyder, David S. Nakamura, Ryotaro Blood Adv Clinical Trials and Observations We report results of our prospective pilot trial evaluating safety/feasibility of peritransplantation ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis treatment. Primary objectives were to determine safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ruxolitinib. Ruxolitinib was administered at 2 dose levels (DLs) of 5 and 10 mg twice daily, with fludarabine/melphalan conditioning regimen and tacrolimus/sirolimus graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. We enrolled 6 and 12 patients at DL1 and DL2, respectively. Median age at transplantation was 65 years (range, 25-73). Per Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System, 4 patients were high and 14 intermediate risk. Peripheral blood stem cells were graft source from matched sibling (n = 5) or unrelated (n = 13) donor. At each DL, 1 patient developed dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs): grade 3 cardiac and gastrointestinal with grade 4 pulmonary DLTs in DL1, and grade 3 kidney injury in DL2. All patients achieved engraftment. Grade 2 to 4 and 3 to 4 acute GVHD cumulative incidence was 17% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6-47) and 11% (95% CI, 3-41), respectively. Cumulative incidence of 1-year chronic GVHD was 42% (95% CI, 24-74). With 22.6-month (range, 6.2-25.8) median follow-up in surviving patients, 1-year overall and progression-free survival were 77% (95% CI, 50-91) and 71% (95% CI, 44-87), respectively. Causes of death (n = 4) were cardiac arrest, GVHD, respiratory failure, and refractory GVHD of liver. Our results show peritransplantation ruxolitinib is safe and well tolerated at MTD of 10 mg twice daily and associated with dose-dependent pharmacokinetic and cytokine profile. Early efficacy data are highly promising in high-risk older patients with myelofibrosis. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02917096. American Society of Hematology 2022-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8905711/ /pubmed/34581764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005035 Text en © 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trials and Observations Ali, Haris Tsai, Ni-Chun Synold, Timothy Mokhtari, Sally Tsia, Weimin Palmer, Joycelynne Stiller, Tracey Al Malki, Monzr Aldoss, Ibrahim Salhotra, Amandeep Rahmanuddin, Syed Pullarkat, Vinod Cai, Ji-Lian Stein, Anthony Forman, Stephen J. Marcucci, Guido Mei, Matthew Snyder, David S. Nakamura, Ryotaro Peritransplantation ruxolitinib administration is safe and effective in patients with myelofibrosis: a pilot open-label study |
title | Peritransplantation ruxolitinib administration is safe and effective in patients with myelofibrosis: a pilot open-label study |
title_full | Peritransplantation ruxolitinib administration is safe and effective in patients with myelofibrosis: a pilot open-label study |
title_fullStr | Peritransplantation ruxolitinib administration is safe and effective in patients with myelofibrosis: a pilot open-label study |
title_full_unstemmed | Peritransplantation ruxolitinib administration is safe and effective in patients with myelofibrosis: a pilot open-label study |
title_short | Peritransplantation ruxolitinib administration is safe and effective in patients with myelofibrosis: a pilot open-label study |
title_sort | peritransplantation ruxolitinib administration is safe and effective in patients with myelofibrosis: a pilot open-label study |
topic | Clinical Trials and Observations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8905711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34581764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005035 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aliharis peritransplantationruxolitinibadministrationissafeandeffectiveinpatientswithmyelofibrosisapilotopenlabelstudy AT tsainichun peritransplantationruxolitinibadministrationissafeandeffectiveinpatientswithmyelofibrosisapilotopenlabelstudy AT synoldtimothy peritransplantationruxolitinibadministrationissafeandeffectiveinpatientswithmyelofibrosisapilotopenlabelstudy AT mokhtarisally peritransplantationruxolitinibadministrationissafeandeffectiveinpatientswithmyelofibrosisapilotopenlabelstudy AT tsiaweimin peritransplantationruxolitinibadministrationissafeandeffectiveinpatientswithmyelofibrosisapilotopenlabelstudy AT palmerjoycelynne peritransplantationruxolitinibadministrationissafeandeffectiveinpatientswithmyelofibrosisapilotopenlabelstudy AT stillertracey peritransplantationruxolitinibadministrationissafeandeffectiveinpatientswithmyelofibrosisapilotopenlabelstudy AT almalkimonzr peritransplantationruxolitinibadministrationissafeandeffectiveinpatientswithmyelofibrosisapilotopenlabelstudy AT aldossibrahim peritransplantationruxolitinibadministrationissafeandeffectiveinpatientswithmyelofibrosisapilotopenlabelstudy AT salhotraamandeep peritransplantationruxolitinibadministrationissafeandeffectiveinpatientswithmyelofibrosisapilotopenlabelstudy AT rahmanuddinsyed peritransplantationruxolitinibadministrationissafeandeffectiveinpatientswithmyelofibrosisapilotopenlabelstudy AT pullarkatvinod peritransplantationruxolitinibadministrationissafeandeffectiveinpatientswithmyelofibrosisapilotopenlabelstudy AT caijilian peritransplantationruxolitinibadministrationissafeandeffectiveinpatientswithmyelofibrosisapilotopenlabelstudy AT steinanthony peritransplantationruxolitinibadministrationissafeandeffectiveinpatientswithmyelofibrosisapilotopenlabelstudy AT formanstephenj peritransplantationruxolitinibadministrationissafeandeffectiveinpatientswithmyelofibrosisapilotopenlabelstudy AT marcucciguido peritransplantationruxolitinibadministrationissafeandeffectiveinpatientswithmyelofibrosisapilotopenlabelstudy AT meimatthew peritransplantationruxolitinibadministrationissafeandeffectiveinpatientswithmyelofibrosisapilotopenlabelstudy AT snyderdavids peritransplantationruxolitinibadministrationissafeandeffectiveinpatientswithmyelofibrosisapilotopenlabelstudy AT nakamuraryotaro peritransplantationruxolitinibadministrationissafeandeffectiveinpatientswithmyelofibrosisapilotopenlabelstudy |