Cargando…

Distal radial artery as an alternative approach to forearm radial artery for perioperative blood pressure monitoring: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial

BACKGROUND: The novel distal radial artery (dRA) approach is a popular arterial access route for interventional cardiology and neurointerventions. We explored the dRA as an alternative site to the classic forearm radial artery (RA) for perioperative blood pressure monitoring. We hypothesized that dR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiong, Jingwei, Hui, Kangli, Xu, Miaomiao, Zhou, Jiejie, Zhang, Jie, Duan, Manlin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8905752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35264106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01609-5
_version_ 1784665259468914688
author Xiong, Jingwei
Hui, Kangli
Xu, Miaomiao
Zhou, Jiejie
Zhang, Jie
Duan, Manlin
author_facet Xiong, Jingwei
Hui, Kangli
Xu, Miaomiao
Zhou, Jiejie
Zhang, Jie
Duan, Manlin
author_sort Xiong, Jingwei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The novel distal radial artery (dRA) approach is a popular arterial access route for interventional cardiology and neurointerventions. We explored the dRA as an alternative site to the classic forearm radial artery (RA) for perioperative blood pressure monitoring. We hypothesized that dRA catheterization is noninferior to RA for the first attempt success rate. METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled, noninferiority study. Adult patients who underwent elective surgery at the Jinling Hospital from May 2021 to August 2021 were enrolled. The primary endpoint was to test the noninferiority of the first attempt success rate between the groups. Secondary endpoints included anatomical characteristics, catheterization time, arterial posterior wall puncture rate, postoperative compression time, dampened arterial pressure waveforms, and complications. RESULTS: Totally, 161 patients who received either dRA (n = 81) or RA (n = 80) catheterization were analyzed. The first attempt success rates were 87.7 and 91.3% in the dRA and RA groups, respectively, with a mean difference of − 3.6% (95% CI, − 13.1 to 5.9%). The dRA diameter and cross-sectional area were significantly smaller than those of the RA (P < 0.001). The subcutaneous depth of dRA was significantly greater than that of the RA (P < 0.001). The dRA had a longer catheterization time (P = 0.008) but a shorter postoperative compression time (P < 0.001). The arterial posterior wall puncture rate of dRA was significantly higher than that of the RA (P = 0.006). The dRA had fewer dampened arterial waveforms than RA (P = 0.030) perioperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The dRA is a rational alternative approach to RA for perioperative arterial pressure monitoring and provides a noninferior first attempt success rate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered in the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2100043714, registration date: 27/02/2021).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8905752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89057522022-03-18 Distal radial artery as an alternative approach to forearm radial artery for perioperative blood pressure monitoring: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial Xiong, Jingwei Hui, Kangli Xu, Miaomiao Zhou, Jiejie Zhang, Jie Duan, Manlin BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: The novel distal radial artery (dRA) approach is a popular arterial access route for interventional cardiology and neurointerventions. We explored the dRA as an alternative site to the classic forearm radial artery (RA) for perioperative blood pressure monitoring. We hypothesized that dRA catheterization is noninferior to RA for the first attempt success rate. METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled, noninferiority study. Adult patients who underwent elective surgery at the Jinling Hospital from May 2021 to August 2021 were enrolled. The primary endpoint was to test the noninferiority of the first attempt success rate between the groups. Secondary endpoints included anatomical characteristics, catheterization time, arterial posterior wall puncture rate, postoperative compression time, dampened arterial pressure waveforms, and complications. RESULTS: Totally, 161 patients who received either dRA (n = 81) or RA (n = 80) catheterization were analyzed. The first attempt success rates were 87.7 and 91.3% in the dRA and RA groups, respectively, with a mean difference of − 3.6% (95% CI, − 13.1 to 5.9%). The dRA diameter and cross-sectional area were significantly smaller than those of the RA (P < 0.001). The subcutaneous depth of dRA was significantly greater than that of the RA (P < 0.001). The dRA had a longer catheterization time (P = 0.008) but a shorter postoperative compression time (P < 0.001). The arterial posterior wall puncture rate of dRA was significantly higher than that of the RA (P = 0.006). The dRA had fewer dampened arterial waveforms than RA (P = 0.030) perioperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The dRA is a rational alternative approach to RA for perioperative arterial pressure monitoring and provides a noninferior first attempt success rate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered in the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2100043714, registration date: 27/02/2021). BioMed Central 2022-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8905752/ /pubmed/35264106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01609-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Xiong, Jingwei
Hui, Kangli
Xu, Miaomiao
Zhou, Jiejie
Zhang, Jie
Duan, Manlin
Distal radial artery as an alternative approach to forearm radial artery for perioperative blood pressure monitoring: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial
title Distal radial artery as an alternative approach to forearm radial artery for perioperative blood pressure monitoring: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial
title_full Distal radial artery as an alternative approach to forearm radial artery for perioperative blood pressure monitoring: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial
title_fullStr Distal radial artery as an alternative approach to forearm radial artery for perioperative blood pressure monitoring: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial
title_full_unstemmed Distal radial artery as an alternative approach to forearm radial artery for perioperative blood pressure monitoring: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial
title_short Distal radial artery as an alternative approach to forearm radial artery for perioperative blood pressure monitoring: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial
title_sort distal radial artery as an alternative approach to forearm radial artery for perioperative blood pressure monitoring: a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8905752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35264106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01609-5
work_keys_str_mv AT xiongjingwei distalradialarteryasanalternativeapproachtoforearmradialarteryforperioperativebloodpressuremonitoringarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT huikangli distalradialarteryasanalternativeapproachtoforearmradialarteryforperioperativebloodpressuremonitoringarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT xumiaomiao distalradialarteryasanalternativeapproachtoforearmradialarteryforperioperativebloodpressuremonitoringarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT zhoujiejie distalradialarteryasanalternativeapproachtoforearmradialarteryforperioperativebloodpressuremonitoringarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT zhangjie distalradialarteryasanalternativeapproachtoforearmradialarteryforperioperativebloodpressuremonitoringarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial
AT duanmanlin distalradialarteryasanalternativeapproachtoforearmradialarteryforperioperativebloodpressuremonitoringarandomizedcontrollednoninferioritytrial