Cargando…

A cross-sectional study: comparison of public perceptions of adverse drug reaction reporting and monitoring in eastern and western China

BACKGROUND: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) cause a substantial clinical and economic burden. Spontaneous reporting of ADRs by the public is crucial. In some developed countries like the United States, Canada, consumers have been allowed to directly report ADRs, however, convenient channels for direct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Ningsheng, Chen, Yue, Ren, Biqi, Xiang, Yufang, Zhao, Nan, Zhan, Xianyan, Feng, Bianling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8905784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35260158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07720-0
_version_ 1784665265843208192
author Wang, Ningsheng
Chen, Yue
Ren, Biqi
Xiang, Yufang
Zhao, Nan
Zhan, Xianyan
Feng, Bianling
author_facet Wang, Ningsheng
Chen, Yue
Ren, Biqi
Xiang, Yufang
Zhao, Nan
Zhan, Xianyan
Feng, Bianling
author_sort Wang, Ningsheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) cause a substantial clinical and economic burden. Spontaneous reporting of ADRs by the public is crucial. In some developed countries like the United States, Canada, consumers have been allowed to directly report ADRs, however, convenient channels for direct ADR reporting by the public are lacking in China. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the knowledge, attitudes, and practice(KAP) regarding monitoring and reporting of adverse drug reaction (ADR) among the general public in eastern and western China. METHODS: A questionnaire-guided cross-sectional study was administered to participants in Nanjing and Xi’an during April–July 2019. A descriptive statistical analysis was used to describe respondents’ demographic information and other results. The t-test and analysis of variance were used to test the differences in knowledge and attitudes among respondents with different demographic characteristics. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to examine factors associated with knowledge and attitudes. RESULTS: A total of 1085 questionnaires were distributed in this survey, 869 valid questionnaires were returned, the recovery rate was 80.09%. Respondents showed poor knowledge of the definition of ADRs and reporting criteria, with a significant difference in average knowledge scores according to education level, gender, and age group. Most respondents had positive attitudes toward ADR monitoring and reporting, with no significant differences in knowledge and attitude scores between the two cities. In total, 68.93% of respondents said they would feedback information to health care professionals, most (84.35%) would take the initiative to report ADRs if there were a convenient method. More than half (58.57%) of respondents were more likely to report ADRs by telephone. CONCLUSION: The findings of our study indicated that health care professionals should encourage patients to actively report ADR. China should also explore ways to facilitate direct public reporting of ADRs by improving relevant laws and regulations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07720-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8905784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89057842022-03-18 A cross-sectional study: comparison of public perceptions of adverse drug reaction reporting and monitoring in eastern and western China Wang, Ningsheng Chen, Yue Ren, Biqi Xiang, Yufang Zhao, Nan Zhan, Xianyan Feng, Bianling BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) cause a substantial clinical and economic burden. Spontaneous reporting of ADRs by the public is crucial. In some developed countries like the United States, Canada, consumers have been allowed to directly report ADRs, however, convenient channels for direct ADR reporting by the public are lacking in China. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the knowledge, attitudes, and practice(KAP) regarding monitoring and reporting of adverse drug reaction (ADR) among the general public in eastern and western China. METHODS: A questionnaire-guided cross-sectional study was administered to participants in Nanjing and Xi’an during April–July 2019. A descriptive statistical analysis was used to describe respondents’ demographic information and other results. The t-test and analysis of variance were used to test the differences in knowledge and attitudes among respondents with different demographic characteristics. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to examine factors associated with knowledge and attitudes. RESULTS: A total of 1085 questionnaires were distributed in this survey, 869 valid questionnaires were returned, the recovery rate was 80.09%. Respondents showed poor knowledge of the definition of ADRs and reporting criteria, with a significant difference in average knowledge scores according to education level, gender, and age group. Most respondents had positive attitudes toward ADR monitoring and reporting, with no significant differences in knowledge and attitude scores between the two cities. In total, 68.93% of respondents said they would feedback information to health care professionals, most (84.35%) would take the initiative to report ADRs if there were a convenient method. More than half (58.57%) of respondents were more likely to report ADRs by telephone. CONCLUSION: The findings of our study indicated that health care professionals should encourage patients to actively report ADR. China should also explore ways to facilitate direct public reporting of ADRs by improving relevant laws and regulations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07720-0. BioMed Central 2022-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8905784/ /pubmed/35260158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07720-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wang, Ningsheng
Chen, Yue
Ren, Biqi
Xiang, Yufang
Zhao, Nan
Zhan, Xianyan
Feng, Bianling
A cross-sectional study: comparison of public perceptions of adverse drug reaction reporting and monitoring in eastern and western China
title A cross-sectional study: comparison of public perceptions of adverse drug reaction reporting and monitoring in eastern and western China
title_full A cross-sectional study: comparison of public perceptions of adverse drug reaction reporting and monitoring in eastern and western China
title_fullStr A cross-sectional study: comparison of public perceptions of adverse drug reaction reporting and monitoring in eastern and western China
title_full_unstemmed A cross-sectional study: comparison of public perceptions of adverse drug reaction reporting and monitoring in eastern and western China
title_short A cross-sectional study: comparison of public perceptions of adverse drug reaction reporting and monitoring in eastern and western China
title_sort cross-sectional study: comparison of public perceptions of adverse drug reaction reporting and monitoring in eastern and western china
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8905784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35260158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07720-0
work_keys_str_mv AT wangningsheng acrosssectionalstudycomparisonofpublicperceptionsofadversedrugreactionreportingandmonitoringineasternandwesternchina
AT chenyue acrosssectionalstudycomparisonofpublicperceptionsofadversedrugreactionreportingandmonitoringineasternandwesternchina
AT renbiqi acrosssectionalstudycomparisonofpublicperceptionsofadversedrugreactionreportingandmonitoringineasternandwesternchina
AT xiangyufang acrosssectionalstudycomparisonofpublicperceptionsofadversedrugreactionreportingandmonitoringineasternandwesternchina
AT zhaonan acrosssectionalstudycomparisonofpublicperceptionsofadversedrugreactionreportingandmonitoringineasternandwesternchina
AT zhanxianyan acrosssectionalstudycomparisonofpublicperceptionsofadversedrugreactionreportingandmonitoringineasternandwesternchina
AT fengbianling acrosssectionalstudycomparisonofpublicperceptionsofadversedrugreactionreportingandmonitoringineasternandwesternchina
AT wangningsheng crosssectionalstudycomparisonofpublicperceptionsofadversedrugreactionreportingandmonitoringineasternandwesternchina
AT chenyue crosssectionalstudycomparisonofpublicperceptionsofadversedrugreactionreportingandmonitoringineasternandwesternchina
AT renbiqi crosssectionalstudycomparisonofpublicperceptionsofadversedrugreactionreportingandmonitoringineasternandwesternchina
AT xiangyufang crosssectionalstudycomparisonofpublicperceptionsofadversedrugreactionreportingandmonitoringineasternandwesternchina
AT zhaonan crosssectionalstudycomparisonofpublicperceptionsofadversedrugreactionreportingandmonitoringineasternandwesternchina
AT zhanxianyan crosssectionalstudycomparisonofpublicperceptionsofadversedrugreactionreportingandmonitoringineasternandwesternchina
AT fengbianling crosssectionalstudycomparisonofpublicperceptionsofadversedrugreactionreportingandmonitoringineasternandwesternchina