Cargando…

Analysis of hydration and subchondral bone density on the viscoelastic properties of bovine articular cartilage

BACKGROUND: Articular cartilage is known to be a viscoelastic material, however little research has explored the impact of cartilage water content and bone density on its viscoelasticity. This study aimed to isolate subchondral bone density and hydration of articular cartilage and analyse their effe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crolla, Joseph P., Lawless, Bernard M., Cederlund, Anna A., Aspden, Richard M., Espino, Daniel M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8905800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35260135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05169-0
_version_ 1784665269361180672
author Crolla, Joseph P.
Lawless, Bernard M.
Cederlund, Anna A.
Aspden, Richard M.
Espino, Daniel M.
author_facet Crolla, Joseph P.
Lawless, Bernard M.
Cederlund, Anna A.
Aspden, Richard M.
Espino, Daniel M.
author_sort Crolla, Joseph P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Articular cartilage is known to be a viscoelastic material, however little research has explored the impact of cartilage water content and bone density on its viscoelasticity. This study aimed to isolate subchondral bone density and hydration of articular cartilage and analyse their effects on the viscoelastic properties of articular cartilage. METHODS: Dynamic mechanical analysis was used to test samples at frequencies of 1, 8, 12, 29, 49, 71, and 88 Hz. Synthetic bone material with densities of 663.7 kg/m(3) and 156.8 kg/m(3) were used to mimic the bone mineral density (BMD). Dehydration occurred in a stepwise manner at relative humidity (RH) levels of 100%, 30%, and 1%. These relative humidity levels led to water contents of approximately 76%, 8.5%, and ≈ 0% by mass, respectively. RESULTS: Samples from eight bovine femoral heads were tested under a sinusoidal load. Storage stiffness was lower on the lower substrate density. Storage stiffness, though, increased as cartilage samples were dehydrated from a water content of 76% to 8.5%; decreasing again as the water content was further reduced. Loss stiffness was lower on a lower density substrate and decreased as the water content decreased. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusions, a decrease in hydration decreases the loss stiffness, but a non-linear relationship between hydration and storage stiffness may exist. Additionally, higher BMD values led to greater storage and loss stiffnesses. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05169-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8905800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89058002022-03-18 Analysis of hydration and subchondral bone density on the viscoelastic properties of bovine articular cartilage Crolla, Joseph P. Lawless, Bernard M. Cederlund, Anna A. Aspden, Richard M. Espino, Daniel M. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Articular cartilage is known to be a viscoelastic material, however little research has explored the impact of cartilage water content and bone density on its viscoelasticity. This study aimed to isolate subchondral bone density and hydration of articular cartilage and analyse their effects on the viscoelastic properties of articular cartilage. METHODS: Dynamic mechanical analysis was used to test samples at frequencies of 1, 8, 12, 29, 49, 71, and 88 Hz. Synthetic bone material with densities of 663.7 kg/m(3) and 156.8 kg/m(3) were used to mimic the bone mineral density (BMD). Dehydration occurred in a stepwise manner at relative humidity (RH) levels of 100%, 30%, and 1%. These relative humidity levels led to water contents of approximately 76%, 8.5%, and ≈ 0% by mass, respectively. RESULTS: Samples from eight bovine femoral heads were tested under a sinusoidal load. Storage stiffness was lower on the lower substrate density. Storage stiffness, though, increased as cartilage samples were dehydrated from a water content of 76% to 8.5%; decreasing again as the water content was further reduced. Loss stiffness was lower on a lower density substrate and decreased as the water content decreased. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusions, a decrease in hydration decreases the loss stiffness, but a non-linear relationship between hydration and storage stiffness may exist. Additionally, higher BMD values led to greater storage and loss stiffnesses. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05169-0. BioMed Central 2022-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8905800/ /pubmed/35260135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05169-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Crolla, Joseph P.
Lawless, Bernard M.
Cederlund, Anna A.
Aspden, Richard M.
Espino, Daniel M.
Analysis of hydration and subchondral bone density on the viscoelastic properties of bovine articular cartilage
title Analysis of hydration and subchondral bone density on the viscoelastic properties of bovine articular cartilage
title_full Analysis of hydration and subchondral bone density on the viscoelastic properties of bovine articular cartilage
title_fullStr Analysis of hydration and subchondral bone density on the viscoelastic properties of bovine articular cartilage
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of hydration and subchondral bone density on the viscoelastic properties of bovine articular cartilage
title_short Analysis of hydration and subchondral bone density on the viscoelastic properties of bovine articular cartilage
title_sort analysis of hydration and subchondral bone density on the viscoelastic properties of bovine articular cartilage
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8905800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35260135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05169-0
work_keys_str_mv AT crollajosephp analysisofhydrationandsubchondralbonedensityontheviscoelasticpropertiesofbovinearticularcartilage
AT lawlessbernardm analysisofhydrationandsubchondralbonedensityontheviscoelasticpropertiesofbovinearticularcartilage
AT cederlundannaa analysisofhydrationandsubchondralbonedensityontheviscoelasticpropertiesofbovinearticularcartilage
AT aspdenrichardm analysisofhydrationandsubchondralbonedensityontheviscoelasticpropertiesofbovinearticularcartilage
AT espinodanielm analysisofhydrationandsubchondralbonedensityontheviscoelasticpropertiesofbovinearticularcartilage