Cargando…

CUP study: protocol for a comparative analysis of centralised waitlist effectiveness, policies and innovations for connecting unattached patients to primary care providers

INTRODUCTION: Access to a primary care provider is a key component of high-functioning healthcare systems. In Canada, 15% of patients do not have a regular primary care provider and are classified as ‘unattached’. In an effort to link unattached patients with a provider, seven Canadian provinces imp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marshall, Emily Gard, Breton, Mylaine, Green, Michael, Edwards, Lynn, Ayn, Caitlyn, Smithman, Mélanie Ann, Ryan Carson, Shannon, Ashcroft, Rachelle, Bayoumi, Imaan, Burge, Frederick, Deslauriers, Véronique, Lawson, Beverley, Mathews, Maria, McPherson, Charmaine, Moritz, Lauren R, Nesto, Sue, Stock, David, Wong, Sabrina T, Andrew, Melissa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8905966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35256440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049686
_version_ 1784665302288564224
author Marshall, Emily Gard
Breton, Mylaine
Green, Michael
Edwards, Lynn
Ayn, Caitlyn
Smithman, Mélanie Ann
Ryan Carson, Shannon
Ashcroft, Rachelle
Bayoumi, Imaan
Burge, Frederick
Deslauriers, Véronique
Lawson, Beverley
Mathews, Maria
McPherson, Charmaine
Moritz, Lauren R
Nesto, Sue
Stock, David
Wong, Sabrina T
Andrew, Melissa
author_facet Marshall, Emily Gard
Breton, Mylaine
Green, Michael
Edwards, Lynn
Ayn, Caitlyn
Smithman, Mélanie Ann
Ryan Carson, Shannon
Ashcroft, Rachelle
Bayoumi, Imaan
Burge, Frederick
Deslauriers, Véronique
Lawson, Beverley
Mathews, Maria
McPherson, Charmaine
Moritz, Lauren R
Nesto, Sue
Stock, David
Wong, Sabrina T
Andrew, Melissa
author_sort Marshall, Emily Gard
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Access to a primary care provider is a key component of high-functioning healthcare systems. In Canada, 15% of patients do not have a regular primary care provider and are classified as ‘unattached’. In an effort to link unattached patients with a provider, seven Canadian provinces implemented centralised waitlists (CWLs). The effectiveness of CWLs in attaching patients to regular primary care providers is unknown. Factors influencing CWLs effectiveness, particularly across jurisdictional contexts, have yet to be confirmed. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed methods case study will be conducted across three Canadian provinces: Ontario, Québec and Nova Scotia. Quantitatively, CWL data will be linked to administrative and provider billing data to assess the rates of patient attachment over time and delay of attachment, stratified by demographics and compared with select indicators of health service utilisation. Qualitative interviews will be conducted with policymakers, patients, and primary care providers to elicit narratives regarding the administration, use, and access of CWLs. An analysis of policy documents will be used to identify contextual factors affecting CWL effectiveness. Stakeholder dialogues will be facilitated to uncover causal pathways and identify strategies for improving patient attachment to primary care. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval to conduct this study has been granted in Ontario (Queens University Health Sciences and Affiliated Teaching Hospitals Research Ethics Board, file number 6028052; Western University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board, project 116591; University of Toronto Health Sciences Research Ethics Board, protocol number 40335), Québec (Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie, project number 2020–3446) and Nova Scotia (Nova Scotia Health Research Ethics Board, file number 1024979).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8905966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89059662022-03-25 CUP study: protocol for a comparative analysis of centralised waitlist effectiveness, policies and innovations for connecting unattached patients to primary care providers Marshall, Emily Gard Breton, Mylaine Green, Michael Edwards, Lynn Ayn, Caitlyn Smithman, Mélanie Ann Ryan Carson, Shannon Ashcroft, Rachelle Bayoumi, Imaan Burge, Frederick Deslauriers, Véronique Lawson, Beverley Mathews, Maria McPherson, Charmaine Moritz, Lauren R Nesto, Sue Stock, David Wong, Sabrina T Andrew, Melissa BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Access to a primary care provider is a key component of high-functioning healthcare systems. In Canada, 15% of patients do not have a regular primary care provider and are classified as ‘unattached’. In an effort to link unattached patients with a provider, seven Canadian provinces implemented centralised waitlists (CWLs). The effectiveness of CWLs in attaching patients to regular primary care providers is unknown. Factors influencing CWLs effectiveness, particularly across jurisdictional contexts, have yet to be confirmed. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed methods case study will be conducted across three Canadian provinces: Ontario, Québec and Nova Scotia. Quantitatively, CWL data will be linked to administrative and provider billing data to assess the rates of patient attachment over time and delay of attachment, stratified by demographics and compared with select indicators of health service utilisation. Qualitative interviews will be conducted with policymakers, patients, and primary care providers to elicit narratives regarding the administration, use, and access of CWLs. An analysis of policy documents will be used to identify contextual factors affecting CWL effectiveness. Stakeholder dialogues will be facilitated to uncover causal pathways and identify strategies for improving patient attachment to primary care. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval to conduct this study has been granted in Ontario (Queens University Health Sciences and Affiliated Teaching Hospitals Research Ethics Board, file number 6028052; Western University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board, project 116591; University of Toronto Health Sciences Research Ethics Board, protocol number 40335), Québec (Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie, project number 2020–3446) and Nova Scotia (Nova Scotia Health Research Ethics Board, file number 1024979). BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8905966/ /pubmed/35256440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049686 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Marshall, Emily Gard
Breton, Mylaine
Green, Michael
Edwards, Lynn
Ayn, Caitlyn
Smithman, Mélanie Ann
Ryan Carson, Shannon
Ashcroft, Rachelle
Bayoumi, Imaan
Burge, Frederick
Deslauriers, Véronique
Lawson, Beverley
Mathews, Maria
McPherson, Charmaine
Moritz, Lauren R
Nesto, Sue
Stock, David
Wong, Sabrina T
Andrew, Melissa
CUP study: protocol for a comparative analysis of centralised waitlist effectiveness, policies and innovations for connecting unattached patients to primary care providers
title CUP study: protocol for a comparative analysis of centralised waitlist effectiveness, policies and innovations for connecting unattached patients to primary care providers
title_full CUP study: protocol for a comparative analysis of centralised waitlist effectiveness, policies and innovations for connecting unattached patients to primary care providers
title_fullStr CUP study: protocol for a comparative analysis of centralised waitlist effectiveness, policies and innovations for connecting unattached patients to primary care providers
title_full_unstemmed CUP study: protocol for a comparative analysis of centralised waitlist effectiveness, policies and innovations for connecting unattached patients to primary care providers
title_short CUP study: protocol for a comparative analysis of centralised waitlist effectiveness, policies and innovations for connecting unattached patients to primary care providers
title_sort cup study: protocol for a comparative analysis of centralised waitlist effectiveness, policies and innovations for connecting unattached patients to primary care providers
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8905966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35256440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049686
work_keys_str_mv AT marshallemilygard cupstudyprotocolforacomparativeanalysisofcentralisedwaitlisteffectivenesspoliciesandinnovationsforconnectingunattachedpatientstoprimarycareproviders
AT bretonmylaine cupstudyprotocolforacomparativeanalysisofcentralisedwaitlisteffectivenesspoliciesandinnovationsforconnectingunattachedpatientstoprimarycareproviders
AT greenmichael cupstudyprotocolforacomparativeanalysisofcentralisedwaitlisteffectivenesspoliciesandinnovationsforconnectingunattachedpatientstoprimarycareproviders
AT edwardslynn cupstudyprotocolforacomparativeanalysisofcentralisedwaitlisteffectivenesspoliciesandinnovationsforconnectingunattachedpatientstoprimarycareproviders
AT ayncaitlyn cupstudyprotocolforacomparativeanalysisofcentralisedwaitlisteffectivenesspoliciesandinnovationsforconnectingunattachedpatientstoprimarycareproviders
AT smithmanmelanieann cupstudyprotocolforacomparativeanalysisofcentralisedwaitlisteffectivenesspoliciesandinnovationsforconnectingunattachedpatientstoprimarycareproviders
AT ryancarsonshannon cupstudyprotocolforacomparativeanalysisofcentralisedwaitlisteffectivenesspoliciesandinnovationsforconnectingunattachedpatientstoprimarycareproviders
AT ashcroftrachelle cupstudyprotocolforacomparativeanalysisofcentralisedwaitlisteffectivenesspoliciesandinnovationsforconnectingunattachedpatientstoprimarycareproviders
AT bayoumiimaan cupstudyprotocolforacomparativeanalysisofcentralisedwaitlisteffectivenesspoliciesandinnovationsforconnectingunattachedpatientstoprimarycareproviders
AT burgefrederick cupstudyprotocolforacomparativeanalysisofcentralisedwaitlisteffectivenesspoliciesandinnovationsforconnectingunattachedpatientstoprimarycareproviders
AT deslauriersveronique cupstudyprotocolforacomparativeanalysisofcentralisedwaitlisteffectivenesspoliciesandinnovationsforconnectingunattachedpatientstoprimarycareproviders
AT lawsonbeverley cupstudyprotocolforacomparativeanalysisofcentralisedwaitlisteffectivenesspoliciesandinnovationsforconnectingunattachedpatientstoprimarycareproviders
AT mathewsmaria cupstudyprotocolforacomparativeanalysisofcentralisedwaitlisteffectivenesspoliciesandinnovationsforconnectingunattachedpatientstoprimarycareproviders
AT mcphersoncharmaine cupstudyprotocolforacomparativeanalysisofcentralisedwaitlisteffectivenesspoliciesandinnovationsforconnectingunattachedpatientstoprimarycareproviders
AT moritzlaurenr cupstudyprotocolforacomparativeanalysisofcentralisedwaitlisteffectivenesspoliciesandinnovationsforconnectingunattachedpatientstoprimarycareproviders
AT nestosue cupstudyprotocolforacomparativeanalysisofcentralisedwaitlisteffectivenesspoliciesandinnovationsforconnectingunattachedpatientstoprimarycareproviders
AT stockdavid cupstudyprotocolforacomparativeanalysisofcentralisedwaitlisteffectivenesspoliciesandinnovationsforconnectingunattachedpatientstoprimarycareproviders
AT wongsabrinat cupstudyprotocolforacomparativeanalysisofcentralisedwaitlisteffectivenesspoliciesandinnovationsforconnectingunattachedpatientstoprimarycareproviders
AT andrewmelissa cupstudyprotocolforacomparativeanalysisofcentralisedwaitlisteffectivenesspoliciesandinnovationsforconnectingunattachedpatientstoprimarycareproviders