Cargando…

Difference between delayed anastomosis and early anastomosis in damage control laparotomy affecting the infusion volume and NPWT output volume: is infusion restriction necessary in delayed anastomosis? A single-center retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVES: During temporary abdominal closure (TAC) with damage control laparotomy (DCL), infusion volume and negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) output volume are associated with the success and prognosis of primary fascial closure. The same may also hold true for anastomosis. The aim of this r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanahashi, Yohta, Sato, Hisaho, Kawakami, Akiko, Sasaki, Shusaku, Nishinari, Yutaka, Ishida, Kaoru, Kojika, Masahiro, Endo, Shigeatsu, Inoue, Yoshihiro, Sasaki, Akira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8905971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2021-000860
_version_ 1784665303566778368
author Tanahashi, Yohta
Sato, Hisaho
Kawakami, Akiko
Sasaki, Shusaku
Nishinari, Yutaka
Ishida, Kaoru
Kojika, Masahiro
Endo, Shigeatsu
Inoue, Yoshihiro
Sasaki, Akira
author_facet Tanahashi, Yohta
Sato, Hisaho
Kawakami, Akiko
Sasaki, Shusaku
Nishinari, Yutaka
Ishida, Kaoru
Kojika, Masahiro
Endo, Shigeatsu
Inoue, Yoshihiro
Sasaki, Akira
author_sort Tanahashi, Yohta
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: During temporary abdominal closure (TAC) with damage control laparotomy (DCL), infusion volume and negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) output volume are associated with the success and prognosis of primary fascial closure. The same may also hold true for anastomosis. The aim of this research is to evaluate whether the difference between early anastomosis and delayed anastomosis in DCL is related to infusion volume and NPWT output volume. METHODS: This single-center retrospective analysis targeted patients managed with TAC during emergency surgery for trauma or intra-abdominal sepsis between January 2011 and December 2019. It included patients who underwent repair/anastomosis/colostomy in the first surgery and patients who underwent intestinal resection in the first surgery followed by delayed anastomosis with no intestinal continuity. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were managed with TAC using NPWT, including 19 cases of repair, 17 of colostomy, and 37 of anastomosis. In 16 patients (trauma 5, sepsis 11) with early anastomosis and 21 patients (trauma 16, sepsis 5) with delayed anastomosis, there was no difference in the infusion volume (p=0.2318) or NPWT output volume (p=0.7128) 48 hours after surgery. Additionally, there was no difference in the occurrence of suture failure (p=0.8428). During the second-look surgery after 48 hours, the anastomosis was further postponed for 48% of the patients who underwent delayed anastomosis. There was no difference in the infusion volume (p=0.0783) up to the second-look surgery between the patients whose delayed anastomosis was postponed and those who underwent delayed anastomosis, but there was a tendency toward a large NPWT output volume (p=0.024) in the postponed delayed anastomosis group. CONCLUSION: Delayed anastomosis may be managed with the same infusion volume as that used for early anastomosis. There is also the option of postponing anastomosis if the planned delayed anastomosis is complicated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management, Level IV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8905971
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89059712022-03-25 Difference between delayed anastomosis and early anastomosis in damage control laparotomy affecting the infusion volume and NPWT output volume: is infusion restriction necessary in delayed anastomosis? A single-center retrospective analysis Tanahashi, Yohta Sato, Hisaho Kawakami, Akiko Sasaki, Shusaku Nishinari, Yutaka Ishida, Kaoru Kojika, Masahiro Endo, Shigeatsu Inoue, Yoshihiro Sasaki, Akira Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Original Research OBJECTIVES: During temporary abdominal closure (TAC) with damage control laparotomy (DCL), infusion volume and negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) output volume are associated with the success and prognosis of primary fascial closure. The same may also hold true for anastomosis. The aim of this research is to evaluate whether the difference between early anastomosis and delayed anastomosis in DCL is related to infusion volume and NPWT output volume. METHODS: This single-center retrospective analysis targeted patients managed with TAC during emergency surgery for trauma or intra-abdominal sepsis between January 2011 and December 2019. It included patients who underwent repair/anastomosis/colostomy in the first surgery and patients who underwent intestinal resection in the first surgery followed by delayed anastomosis with no intestinal continuity. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were managed with TAC using NPWT, including 19 cases of repair, 17 of colostomy, and 37 of anastomosis. In 16 patients (trauma 5, sepsis 11) with early anastomosis and 21 patients (trauma 16, sepsis 5) with delayed anastomosis, there was no difference in the infusion volume (p=0.2318) or NPWT output volume (p=0.7128) 48 hours after surgery. Additionally, there was no difference in the occurrence of suture failure (p=0.8428). During the second-look surgery after 48 hours, the anastomosis was further postponed for 48% of the patients who underwent delayed anastomosis. There was no difference in the infusion volume (p=0.0783) up to the second-look surgery between the patients whose delayed anastomosis was postponed and those who underwent delayed anastomosis, but there was a tendency toward a large NPWT output volume (p=0.024) in the postponed delayed anastomosis group. CONCLUSION: Delayed anastomosis may be managed with the same infusion volume as that used for early anastomosis. There is also the option of postponing anastomosis if the planned delayed anastomosis is complicated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management, Level IV. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8905971/ /pubmed/35340705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2021-000860 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Tanahashi, Yohta
Sato, Hisaho
Kawakami, Akiko
Sasaki, Shusaku
Nishinari, Yutaka
Ishida, Kaoru
Kojika, Masahiro
Endo, Shigeatsu
Inoue, Yoshihiro
Sasaki, Akira
Difference between delayed anastomosis and early anastomosis in damage control laparotomy affecting the infusion volume and NPWT output volume: is infusion restriction necessary in delayed anastomosis? A single-center retrospective analysis
title Difference between delayed anastomosis and early anastomosis in damage control laparotomy affecting the infusion volume and NPWT output volume: is infusion restriction necessary in delayed anastomosis? A single-center retrospective analysis
title_full Difference between delayed anastomosis and early anastomosis in damage control laparotomy affecting the infusion volume and NPWT output volume: is infusion restriction necessary in delayed anastomosis? A single-center retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Difference between delayed anastomosis and early anastomosis in damage control laparotomy affecting the infusion volume and NPWT output volume: is infusion restriction necessary in delayed anastomosis? A single-center retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Difference between delayed anastomosis and early anastomosis in damage control laparotomy affecting the infusion volume and NPWT output volume: is infusion restriction necessary in delayed anastomosis? A single-center retrospective analysis
title_short Difference between delayed anastomosis and early anastomosis in damage control laparotomy affecting the infusion volume and NPWT output volume: is infusion restriction necessary in delayed anastomosis? A single-center retrospective analysis
title_sort difference between delayed anastomosis and early anastomosis in damage control laparotomy affecting the infusion volume and npwt output volume: is infusion restriction necessary in delayed anastomosis? a single-center retrospective analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8905971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2021-000860
work_keys_str_mv AT tanahashiyohta differencebetweendelayedanastomosisandearlyanastomosisindamagecontrollaparotomyaffectingtheinfusionvolumeandnpwtoutputvolumeisinfusionrestrictionnecessaryindelayedanastomosisasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysis
AT satohisaho differencebetweendelayedanastomosisandearlyanastomosisindamagecontrollaparotomyaffectingtheinfusionvolumeandnpwtoutputvolumeisinfusionrestrictionnecessaryindelayedanastomosisasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysis
AT kawakamiakiko differencebetweendelayedanastomosisandearlyanastomosisindamagecontrollaparotomyaffectingtheinfusionvolumeandnpwtoutputvolumeisinfusionrestrictionnecessaryindelayedanastomosisasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysis
AT sasakishusaku differencebetweendelayedanastomosisandearlyanastomosisindamagecontrollaparotomyaffectingtheinfusionvolumeandnpwtoutputvolumeisinfusionrestrictionnecessaryindelayedanastomosisasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysis
AT nishinariyutaka differencebetweendelayedanastomosisandearlyanastomosisindamagecontrollaparotomyaffectingtheinfusionvolumeandnpwtoutputvolumeisinfusionrestrictionnecessaryindelayedanastomosisasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysis
AT ishidakaoru differencebetweendelayedanastomosisandearlyanastomosisindamagecontrollaparotomyaffectingtheinfusionvolumeandnpwtoutputvolumeisinfusionrestrictionnecessaryindelayedanastomosisasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysis
AT kojikamasahiro differencebetweendelayedanastomosisandearlyanastomosisindamagecontrollaparotomyaffectingtheinfusionvolumeandnpwtoutputvolumeisinfusionrestrictionnecessaryindelayedanastomosisasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysis
AT endoshigeatsu differencebetweendelayedanastomosisandearlyanastomosisindamagecontrollaparotomyaffectingtheinfusionvolumeandnpwtoutputvolumeisinfusionrestrictionnecessaryindelayedanastomosisasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysis
AT inoueyoshihiro differencebetweendelayedanastomosisandearlyanastomosisindamagecontrollaparotomyaffectingtheinfusionvolumeandnpwtoutputvolumeisinfusionrestrictionnecessaryindelayedanastomosisasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysis
AT sasakiakira differencebetweendelayedanastomosisandearlyanastomosisindamagecontrollaparotomyaffectingtheinfusionvolumeandnpwtoutputvolumeisinfusionrestrictionnecessaryindelayedanastomosisasinglecenterretrospectiveanalysis