Cargando…

Self-administered, remote assessment of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in health care workers

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to safely and remotely assess longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in at-risk health care workers at the onset of the epidemic. METHODS: Self-administered serologic testing was performed every 30 days up to 5 times using a point-of-care, lateral flow SARS-CoV-2 nucleo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Card, Lauren, Litwin, Christine M., Curry, Scott, Mack, Elizabeth H., Nietert, Paul J., Meissner, Eric G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Southern Society for Clinical Investigation. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8906004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35278364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2022.01.025
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Our objective was to safely and remotely assess longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in at-risk health care workers at the onset of the epidemic. METHODS: Self-administered serologic testing was performed every 30 days up to 5 times using a point-of-care, lateral flow SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid IgG immunoassay in a cohort of at-risk health care workers (n = 339) and lower-risk controls (n = 100). RESULTS: Subjects were enrolled between 4/14/20–5/6/20 and most were clinicians (41%) or nurses (27%). Of 20 subjects who reported confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to (n = 5, 1%) or during the study (n = 15, 3%), half (10/20) were seropositive. Five additional subjects were seropositive and did not report documented infection. Estimated infection rates in health care workers did not differ from concurrent community rates. CONCLUSIONS: This remotely conducted, contact-free study did not identify serologic evidence of widespread occupational SARS-CoV-2 infection in health care workers.