Cargando…

A method for time‐independent film dosimetry: Can we obtain accurate patient‐specific QA results at any time postirradiation?

AIM: The aim of this work was twofold. (1) To investigate and present a comparison between EBT3 and EBT‐XD in terms of postirradiation color changes. (2) Create an automated workflow to allow radiochromic film (EBT3/XD) to be scanned and converted to dose accurately at any postirradiation time. MATE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dunn, Leon, Godwin, Guy, Hellyer, James, Xu, Xiaolei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8906213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35049118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13534
_version_ 1784665361540448256
author Dunn, Leon
Godwin, Guy
Hellyer, James
Xu, Xiaolei
author_facet Dunn, Leon
Godwin, Guy
Hellyer, James
Xu, Xiaolei
author_sort Dunn, Leon
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this work was twofold. (1) To investigate and present a comparison between EBT3 and EBT‐XD in terms of postirradiation color changes. (2) Create an automated workflow to allow radiochromic film (EBT3/XD) to be scanned and converted to dose accurately at any postirradiation time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten GafChromic EBT‐XD calibration films were exposed in 2 Gy increments up to 18 Gy. Calibrates were then scanned at 5‐min intervals postirradiation over 24 h using an AutoHotKey script, resulting in 288 TIFF images. Following the 24‐h scanning period, a MATLAB script was used to automatically read the tiff images and create a series of 288 calibration curves distinct in time which is termed as the “Temporal Calibration Model” (TCM). The model is saved as a series of polynomial fit coefficients to net optical density as a function of dose, timestamped in 5‐min increments. Ten patient‐specific film measurements (5 × EBT‐XD and 5 × EBT3) were then carried out and scanned using the same 5‐min scan intervals from 5 min postirradiation to 24 h postirradiation. The TCM was then automatically applied using eFilmQA software to convert the patient‐specific QA films to dose by applying the relevant calibration curve from the TCM, corresponding to the arbitrary postirradiation time that the film was scanned. Each dose plane at postirradiation scan intervals of 5 min up to 20 h was then compared to the ground‐truth dose plane using gamma analysis. RESULTS: Gamma pass rates using the TCM at time t, normalized to the pass rate after 20 h postirradiation, were found to have a maximum coefficient of variation of 3% over any postirradiation time. Conversely, not using the TCM resulted in coefficients of variation of up to 39%. Clinical implementation of this method showed an average accuracy of 2.8% when comparing the clinical result to the TCM result. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a methodology that allows radiochromic film to be accurately used as a dosimeter at any arbitrary scan postirradiation time, whereas previously, waiting periods of 16–24 h before readout were needed to ensure the postirradiation changes had stabilized. The creation of a TCM can enable results from radiochromic film measurements to be obtained quickly postirradiation. Using a conventional single calibration curve generated at 20 h postirradiation can result in gamma pass‐rate difference of up to 75% for measurement films scanned at a much shorter postirradiation time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8906213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89062132022-03-10 A method for time‐independent film dosimetry: Can we obtain accurate patient‐specific QA results at any time postirradiation? Dunn, Leon Godwin, Guy Hellyer, James Xu, Xiaolei J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Measurements AIM: The aim of this work was twofold. (1) To investigate and present a comparison between EBT3 and EBT‐XD in terms of postirradiation color changes. (2) Create an automated workflow to allow radiochromic film (EBT3/XD) to be scanned and converted to dose accurately at any postirradiation time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten GafChromic EBT‐XD calibration films were exposed in 2 Gy increments up to 18 Gy. Calibrates were then scanned at 5‐min intervals postirradiation over 24 h using an AutoHotKey script, resulting in 288 TIFF images. Following the 24‐h scanning period, a MATLAB script was used to automatically read the tiff images and create a series of 288 calibration curves distinct in time which is termed as the “Temporal Calibration Model” (TCM). The model is saved as a series of polynomial fit coefficients to net optical density as a function of dose, timestamped in 5‐min increments. Ten patient‐specific film measurements (5 × EBT‐XD and 5 × EBT3) were then carried out and scanned using the same 5‐min scan intervals from 5 min postirradiation to 24 h postirradiation. The TCM was then automatically applied using eFilmQA software to convert the patient‐specific QA films to dose by applying the relevant calibration curve from the TCM, corresponding to the arbitrary postirradiation time that the film was scanned. Each dose plane at postirradiation scan intervals of 5 min up to 20 h was then compared to the ground‐truth dose plane using gamma analysis. RESULTS: Gamma pass rates using the TCM at time t, normalized to the pass rate after 20 h postirradiation, were found to have a maximum coefficient of variation of 3% over any postirradiation time. Conversely, not using the TCM resulted in coefficients of variation of up to 39%. Clinical implementation of this method showed an average accuracy of 2.8% when comparing the clinical result to the TCM result. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a methodology that allows radiochromic film to be accurately used as a dosimeter at any arbitrary scan postirradiation time, whereas previously, waiting periods of 16–24 h before readout were needed to ensure the postirradiation changes had stabilized. The creation of a TCM can enable results from radiochromic film measurements to be obtained quickly postirradiation. Using a conventional single calibration curve generated at 20 h postirradiation can result in gamma pass‐rate difference of up to 75% for measurement films scanned at a much shorter postirradiation time. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8906213/ /pubmed/35049118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13534 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Measurements
Dunn, Leon
Godwin, Guy
Hellyer, James
Xu, Xiaolei
A method for time‐independent film dosimetry: Can we obtain accurate patient‐specific QA results at any time postirradiation?
title A method for time‐independent film dosimetry: Can we obtain accurate patient‐specific QA results at any time postirradiation?
title_full A method for time‐independent film dosimetry: Can we obtain accurate patient‐specific QA results at any time postirradiation?
title_fullStr A method for time‐independent film dosimetry: Can we obtain accurate patient‐specific QA results at any time postirradiation?
title_full_unstemmed A method for time‐independent film dosimetry: Can we obtain accurate patient‐specific QA results at any time postirradiation?
title_short A method for time‐independent film dosimetry: Can we obtain accurate patient‐specific QA results at any time postirradiation?
title_sort method for time‐independent film dosimetry: can we obtain accurate patient‐specific qa results at any time postirradiation?
topic Radiation Measurements
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8906213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35049118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13534
work_keys_str_mv AT dunnleon amethodfortimeindependentfilmdosimetrycanweobtainaccuratepatientspecificqaresultsatanytimepostirradiation
AT godwinguy amethodfortimeindependentfilmdosimetrycanweobtainaccuratepatientspecificqaresultsatanytimepostirradiation
AT hellyerjames amethodfortimeindependentfilmdosimetrycanweobtainaccuratepatientspecificqaresultsatanytimepostirradiation
AT xuxiaolei amethodfortimeindependentfilmdosimetrycanweobtainaccuratepatientspecificqaresultsatanytimepostirradiation
AT dunnleon methodfortimeindependentfilmdosimetrycanweobtainaccuratepatientspecificqaresultsatanytimepostirradiation
AT godwinguy methodfortimeindependentfilmdosimetrycanweobtainaccuratepatientspecificqaresultsatanytimepostirradiation
AT hellyerjames methodfortimeindependentfilmdosimetrycanweobtainaccuratepatientspecificqaresultsatanytimepostirradiation
AT xuxiaolei methodfortimeindependentfilmdosimetrycanweobtainaccuratepatientspecificqaresultsatanytimepostirradiation