Cargando…

Impact of geometric distortion on dose deviation for photon and proton treatment plans

We investigated the dose deviation related to geometric distortion and dose gradient on magnetic resonance‐only treatment planning for intensity‐modulated radiation therapy and proton therapy. The residual geometric distortion of two different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences (A) and (B) w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Yue, Yang, Jinzhong, Li, Yuting, Ding, Yao, Kadbi, Mo, Wang, Jihong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8906217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35106908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13517
_version_ 1784665362609995776
author Yan, Yue
Yang, Jinzhong
Li, Yuting
Ding, Yao
Kadbi, Mo
Wang, Jihong
author_facet Yan, Yue
Yang, Jinzhong
Li, Yuting
Ding, Yao
Kadbi, Mo
Wang, Jihong
author_sort Yan, Yue
collection PubMed
description We investigated the dose deviation related to geometric distortion and dose gradient on magnetic resonance‐only treatment planning for intensity‐modulated radiation therapy and proton therapy. The residual geometric distortion of two different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences (A) and (B) was applied in the computed tomography image and the structure set of each patient through a polynomial MRI geometric distortion model to simulate MRI‐based treatment planning. A 3D histogram was generated to specify the relationship of dose deviation to geometric distortion and dose gradient. When the dose gradient (G(d)) approached zero, the maximum dose deviation reached 1.64% and 2.71% for photon plans of sequences A and B, respectively. For proton plans, the maximum dose deviation reached 3.15% and 4.89% for sequences A and B, respectively. When the geometric distortion (d) was close to zero, the maximum dose deviation was less than 0.8% for photon and proton plans of both sequences. Under extreme conditions (d = 2 mm and G(d) = 4.5%/mm), the median value of dose deviation reached 3% and 3.49% for photon and proton plans, respectively for sequence A, and 2.93% and 4.55% for photon and proton plans, respectively, for sequence B. We demonstrate that the dose deviation is specific to MRI hardware parameters. Compared to the photon plan, the proton plan is more sensitive to the changes in geometric distortion. For typical clinical MRI geometric distortion (d ≤2 mm), the median dose deviation is expected to be within 3% and 5% for photon and proton plans, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8906217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89062172022-03-10 Impact of geometric distortion on dose deviation for photon and proton treatment plans Yan, Yue Yang, Jinzhong Li, Yuting Ding, Yao Kadbi, Mo Wang, Jihong J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics We investigated the dose deviation related to geometric distortion and dose gradient on magnetic resonance‐only treatment planning for intensity‐modulated radiation therapy and proton therapy. The residual geometric distortion of two different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences (A) and (B) was applied in the computed tomography image and the structure set of each patient through a polynomial MRI geometric distortion model to simulate MRI‐based treatment planning. A 3D histogram was generated to specify the relationship of dose deviation to geometric distortion and dose gradient. When the dose gradient (G(d)) approached zero, the maximum dose deviation reached 1.64% and 2.71% for photon plans of sequences A and B, respectively. For proton plans, the maximum dose deviation reached 3.15% and 4.89% for sequences A and B, respectively. When the geometric distortion (d) was close to zero, the maximum dose deviation was less than 0.8% for photon and proton plans of both sequences. Under extreme conditions (d = 2 mm and G(d) = 4.5%/mm), the median value of dose deviation reached 3% and 3.49% for photon and proton plans, respectively for sequence A, and 2.93% and 4.55% for photon and proton plans, respectively, for sequence B. We demonstrate that the dose deviation is specific to MRI hardware parameters. Compared to the photon plan, the proton plan is more sensitive to the changes in geometric distortion. For typical clinical MRI geometric distortion (d ≤2 mm), the median dose deviation is expected to be within 3% and 5% for photon and proton plans, respectively. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8906217/ /pubmed/35106908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13517 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Yan, Yue
Yang, Jinzhong
Li, Yuting
Ding, Yao
Kadbi, Mo
Wang, Jihong
Impact of geometric distortion on dose deviation for photon and proton treatment plans
title Impact of geometric distortion on dose deviation for photon and proton treatment plans
title_full Impact of geometric distortion on dose deviation for photon and proton treatment plans
title_fullStr Impact of geometric distortion on dose deviation for photon and proton treatment plans
title_full_unstemmed Impact of geometric distortion on dose deviation for photon and proton treatment plans
title_short Impact of geometric distortion on dose deviation for photon and proton treatment plans
title_sort impact of geometric distortion on dose deviation for photon and proton treatment plans
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8906217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35106908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13517
work_keys_str_mv AT yanyue impactofgeometricdistortionondosedeviationforphotonandprotontreatmentplans
AT yangjinzhong impactofgeometricdistortionondosedeviationforphotonandprotontreatmentplans
AT liyuting impactofgeometricdistortionondosedeviationforphotonandprotontreatmentplans
AT dingyao impactofgeometricdistortionondosedeviationforphotonandprotontreatmentplans
AT kadbimo impactofgeometricdistortionondosedeviationforphotonandprotontreatmentplans
AT wangjihong impactofgeometricdistortionondosedeviationforphotonandprotontreatmentplans