Cargando…
Impact of geometric distortion on dose deviation for photon and proton treatment plans
We investigated the dose deviation related to geometric distortion and dose gradient on magnetic resonance‐only treatment planning for intensity‐modulated radiation therapy and proton therapy. The residual geometric distortion of two different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences (A) and (B) w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8906217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35106908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13517 |
_version_ | 1784665362609995776 |
---|---|
author | Yan, Yue Yang, Jinzhong Li, Yuting Ding, Yao Kadbi, Mo Wang, Jihong |
author_facet | Yan, Yue Yang, Jinzhong Li, Yuting Ding, Yao Kadbi, Mo Wang, Jihong |
author_sort | Yan, Yue |
collection | PubMed |
description | We investigated the dose deviation related to geometric distortion and dose gradient on magnetic resonance‐only treatment planning for intensity‐modulated radiation therapy and proton therapy. The residual geometric distortion of two different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences (A) and (B) was applied in the computed tomography image and the structure set of each patient through a polynomial MRI geometric distortion model to simulate MRI‐based treatment planning. A 3D histogram was generated to specify the relationship of dose deviation to geometric distortion and dose gradient. When the dose gradient (G(d)) approached zero, the maximum dose deviation reached 1.64% and 2.71% for photon plans of sequences A and B, respectively. For proton plans, the maximum dose deviation reached 3.15% and 4.89% for sequences A and B, respectively. When the geometric distortion (d) was close to zero, the maximum dose deviation was less than 0.8% for photon and proton plans of both sequences. Under extreme conditions (d = 2 mm and G(d) = 4.5%/mm), the median value of dose deviation reached 3% and 3.49% for photon and proton plans, respectively for sequence A, and 2.93% and 4.55% for photon and proton plans, respectively, for sequence B. We demonstrate that the dose deviation is specific to MRI hardware parameters. Compared to the photon plan, the proton plan is more sensitive to the changes in geometric distortion. For typical clinical MRI geometric distortion (d ≤2 mm), the median dose deviation is expected to be within 3% and 5% for photon and proton plans, respectively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8906217 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89062172022-03-10 Impact of geometric distortion on dose deviation for photon and proton treatment plans Yan, Yue Yang, Jinzhong Li, Yuting Ding, Yao Kadbi, Mo Wang, Jihong J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics We investigated the dose deviation related to geometric distortion and dose gradient on magnetic resonance‐only treatment planning for intensity‐modulated radiation therapy and proton therapy. The residual geometric distortion of two different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences (A) and (B) was applied in the computed tomography image and the structure set of each patient through a polynomial MRI geometric distortion model to simulate MRI‐based treatment planning. A 3D histogram was generated to specify the relationship of dose deviation to geometric distortion and dose gradient. When the dose gradient (G(d)) approached zero, the maximum dose deviation reached 1.64% and 2.71% for photon plans of sequences A and B, respectively. For proton plans, the maximum dose deviation reached 3.15% and 4.89% for sequences A and B, respectively. When the geometric distortion (d) was close to zero, the maximum dose deviation was less than 0.8% for photon and proton plans of both sequences. Under extreme conditions (d = 2 mm and G(d) = 4.5%/mm), the median value of dose deviation reached 3% and 3.49% for photon and proton plans, respectively for sequence A, and 2.93% and 4.55% for photon and proton plans, respectively, for sequence B. We demonstrate that the dose deviation is specific to MRI hardware parameters. Compared to the photon plan, the proton plan is more sensitive to the changes in geometric distortion. For typical clinical MRI geometric distortion (d ≤2 mm), the median dose deviation is expected to be within 3% and 5% for photon and proton plans, respectively. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8906217/ /pubmed/35106908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13517 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Yan, Yue Yang, Jinzhong Li, Yuting Ding, Yao Kadbi, Mo Wang, Jihong Impact of geometric distortion on dose deviation for photon and proton treatment plans |
title | Impact of geometric distortion on dose deviation for photon and proton treatment plans |
title_full | Impact of geometric distortion on dose deviation for photon and proton treatment plans |
title_fullStr | Impact of geometric distortion on dose deviation for photon and proton treatment plans |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of geometric distortion on dose deviation for photon and proton treatment plans |
title_short | Impact of geometric distortion on dose deviation for photon and proton treatment plans |
title_sort | impact of geometric distortion on dose deviation for photon and proton treatment plans |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8906217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35106908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13517 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanyue impactofgeometricdistortionondosedeviationforphotonandprotontreatmentplans AT yangjinzhong impactofgeometricdistortionondosedeviationforphotonandprotontreatmentplans AT liyuting impactofgeometricdistortionondosedeviationforphotonandprotontreatmentplans AT dingyao impactofgeometricdistortionondosedeviationforphotonandprotontreatmentplans AT kadbimo impactofgeometricdistortionondosedeviationforphotonandprotontreatmentplans AT wangjihong impactofgeometricdistortionondosedeviationforphotonandprotontreatmentplans |