Cargando…

Development of a Rapid and Low-Cost Method for the Extraction of Dermatophyte DNA

BACKGROUND: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the most optimized method for the rapid detection and analysis of any environmental or clinically significant organism. While PCR amplification directly from samples has been shown effective for several bacteria and viruses, for filamentous fungus and y...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kenjar, Apoorva, M Raj, Juliet R, Bhandary, Joshika, Girisha, Banavasi S, Chakraborty, Gunimala, Karunasagar, Indrani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8906329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35283499
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijd.ijd_19_21
_version_ 1784665386992533504
author Kenjar, Apoorva
M Raj, Juliet R
Bhandary, Joshika
Girisha, Banavasi S
Chakraborty, Gunimala
Karunasagar, Indrani
author_facet Kenjar, Apoorva
M Raj, Juliet R
Bhandary, Joshika
Girisha, Banavasi S
Chakraborty, Gunimala
Karunasagar, Indrani
author_sort Kenjar, Apoorva
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the most optimized method for the rapid detection and analysis of any environmental or clinically significant organism. While PCR amplification directly from samples has been shown effective for several bacteria and viruses, for filamentous fungus and yeast, extraction of genomic DNA is a must. The extraction of DNA from fungal cultures is often reported using user-friendly commercially available kits, which are designed to decrease the time, extensive manual work in extraction procedures but are often expensive. Dermatophytes pose an added drawback to efficient DNA extraction due to their poor recovery on culture media and slow growth rate. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: In the present study, we developed and validated a method for effective genomic DNA extraction from dermatophytes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DNA yield from standard dermatophytes extracted from spore suspensions and mycelia mat by commercially available kits was compared. A modified method using lyticase buffer and phenol-chloroform extraction was developed. The yield obtained was compared with the existing methods (kit-based method and cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide method). The yield and quality of the total genomic DNA were estimated spectrophotometrically and by successful PCR amplification of the ITS region. The results were validated using 21 clinical isolates from recalcitrant dermatophytosis. RESULTS: Minimal fungal DNA was obtained from the spores compared to that obtained from mycelial mat. Commercially available kits yielded lower amounts of DNA compared to the CATB method. The modified method developed in this study yielded better quality and quantity of DNA. CONCLUSION: Of the three extraction methods evaluated, the developed method gave significantly higher total genomic DNA yield and better purity than the reference methods. In addition, the turnaround time for DNA extraction was reduced to half based on modifications in culture conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8906329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89063292022-03-10 Development of a Rapid and Low-Cost Method for the Extraction of Dermatophyte DNA Kenjar, Apoorva M Raj, Juliet R Bhandary, Joshika Girisha, Banavasi S Chakraborty, Gunimala Karunasagar, Indrani Indian J Dermatol Basic Research BACKGROUND: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the most optimized method for the rapid detection and analysis of any environmental or clinically significant organism. While PCR amplification directly from samples has been shown effective for several bacteria and viruses, for filamentous fungus and yeast, extraction of genomic DNA is a must. The extraction of DNA from fungal cultures is often reported using user-friendly commercially available kits, which are designed to decrease the time, extensive manual work in extraction procedures but are often expensive. Dermatophytes pose an added drawback to efficient DNA extraction due to their poor recovery on culture media and slow growth rate. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: In the present study, we developed and validated a method for effective genomic DNA extraction from dermatophytes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DNA yield from standard dermatophytes extracted from spore suspensions and mycelia mat by commercially available kits was compared. A modified method using lyticase buffer and phenol-chloroform extraction was developed. The yield obtained was compared with the existing methods (kit-based method and cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide method). The yield and quality of the total genomic DNA were estimated spectrophotometrically and by successful PCR amplification of the ITS region. The results were validated using 21 clinical isolates from recalcitrant dermatophytosis. RESULTS: Minimal fungal DNA was obtained from the spores compared to that obtained from mycelial mat. Commercially available kits yielded lower amounts of DNA compared to the CATB method. The modified method developed in this study yielded better quality and quantity of DNA. CONCLUSION: Of the three extraction methods evaluated, the developed method gave significantly higher total genomic DNA yield and better purity than the reference methods. In addition, the turnaround time for DNA extraction was reduced to half based on modifications in culture conditions. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8906329/ /pubmed/35283499 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijd.ijd_19_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Dermatology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Basic Research
Kenjar, Apoorva
M Raj, Juliet R
Bhandary, Joshika
Girisha, Banavasi S
Chakraborty, Gunimala
Karunasagar, Indrani
Development of a Rapid and Low-Cost Method for the Extraction of Dermatophyte DNA
title Development of a Rapid and Low-Cost Method for the Extraction of Dermatophyte DNA
title_full Development of a Rapid and Low-Cost Method for the Extraction of Dermatophyte DNA
title_fullStr Development of a Rapid and Low-Cost Method for the Extraction of Dermatophyte DNA
title_full_unstemmed Development of a Rapid and Low-Cost Method for the Extraction of Dermatophyte DNA
title_short Development of a Rapid and Low-Cost Method for the Extraction of Dermatophyte DNA
title_sort development of a rapid and low-cost method for the extraction of dermatophyte dna
topic Basic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8906329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35283499
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijd.ijd_19_21
work_keys_str_mv AT kenjarapoorva developmentofarapidandlowcostmethodfortheextractionofdermatophytedna
AT mrajjulietr developmentofarapidandlowcostmethodfortheextractionofdermatophytedna
AT bhandaryjoshika developmentofarapidandlowcostmethodfortheextractionofdermatophytedna
AT girishabanavasis developmentofarapidandlowcostmethodfortheextractionofdermatophytedna
AT chakrabortygunimala developmentofarapidandlowcostmethodfortheextractionofdermatophytedna
AT karunasagarindrani developmentofarapidandlowcostmethodfortheextractionofdermatophytedna