Cargando…
An observational analysis of the trope “A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant” and other cut-and-paste statistical methods
Appropriate descriptions of statistical methods are essential for evaluating research quality and reproducibility. Despite continued efforts to improve reporting in publications, inadequate descriptions of statistical methods persist. At times, reading statistical methods sections can conjure feelin...
Autores principales: | White, Nicole M., Balasubramaniam, Thirunavukarasu, Nayak, Richi, Barnett, Adrian G. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8906599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35263374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264360 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Statistical significance: p value, 0.05 threshold, and applications to radiomics—reasons for a conservative approach
por: Di Leo, Giovanni, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Are Only p-Values Less Than 0.05 Significant? A p-Value Greater Than 0.05 Is Also Significant!
por: Kwak, Sanggyu
Publicado: (2023) -
Trope analysis and folk intuitions
por: Rennick, Stephanie
Publicado: (2021) -
The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research
por: Amrhein, Valentin, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Efficacy of Topical Cyclosporine Nanoemulsion 0.05% Compared with Topical Cyclosporine Emulsion 0.05% and Diquafosol 3% in Dry Eye
por: Park, Chang Hyun, et al.
Publicado: (2019)