Cargando…
Benefit of Prompt versus Delayed Use of Single-Inhaler Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) Following a COPD Exacerbation
PURPOSE: Triple therapy (TT; inhaled corticosteroid, long-acting muscarinic antagonist, and long-acting β(2)-agonist) is recommended for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at risk of exacerbation, although the optimum timing of TT initiation remains unclear. This study evalua...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8906822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35281476 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S337668 |
_version_ | 1784665470395219968 |
---|---|
author | Mannino, David Bogart, Michael Germain, Guillaume Huang, Shirley P Ismaila, Afisi S Laliberté, François Jung, Young MacKnight, Sean D Stiegler, Marjorie A Duh, Mei Sheng |
author_facet | Mannino, David Bogart, Michael Germain, Guillaume Huang, Shirley P Ismaila, Afisi S Laliberté, François Jung, Young MacKnight, Sean D Stiegler, Marjorie A Duh, Mei Sheng |
author_sort | Mannino, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Triple therapy (TT; inhaled corticosteroid, long-acting muscarinic antagonist, and long-acting β(2)-agonist) is recommended for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at risk of exacerbation, although the optimum timing of TT initiation remains unclear. This study evaluated the impact of prompt versus delayed initiation of single-inhaler TT (fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol [FF/UMEC/VI]) following a COPD exacerbation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from the IQVIA PharMetrics(®) Plus database. Patients initiating FF/UMEC/VI following a COPD exacerbation between September 18, 2017 and September 30, 2019 (exacerbation = index date) were categorized as prompt (within 30 days of index) or delayed (31–180 days after index) FF/UMEC/VI initiators. Patients were aged ≥40 years at index, had ≥12 months’ continuous health insurance coverage before index (baseline), and ≥6 months’ coverage after index (follow-up). Patients with a COPD exacerbation or claim for FF/UMEC/VI during baseline were excluded. Inverse probability weighting was used to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics between cohorts. Exacerbations (overall, moderate, and severe), healthcare costs, and readmissions were evaluated during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 1904 patients (prompt: 529; delayed: 1375) were included. After weighting, baseline characteristics were well balanced between cohorts. Patients in the prompt cohort had significantly lower rates per person-year (PPY) of overall (0.98 vs 1.23; rate ratio [RR] [95% CI] = 0.79 [0.65–0.94], p = 0.004), moderate (0.86 vs 1.03; RR [95% CI] = 0.84 [0.69–0.99], p = 0.038), and severe (0.11 vs 0.20; RR [95% CI] = 0.57 [0.37–0.79], p = 0.002) exacerbations, compared with delayed initiators. Mean all-cause and COPD-related healthcare costs were significantly lower among prompt initiators (all-cause: $26,107 vs $32,400 PPY, p = 0.014; COPD-related: $12,694 vs $17,640 PPY, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Prompt initiation of FF/UMEC/VI following a moderate or severe COPD exacerbation was associated with significant reductions in exacerbations and healthcare costs relative to delayed initiation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8906822 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89068222022-03-10 Benefit of Prompt versus Delayed Use of Single-Inhaler Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) Following a COPD Exacerbation Mannino, David Bogart, Michael Germain, Guillaume Huang, Shirley P Ismaila, Afisi S Laliberté, François Jung, Young MacKnight, Sean D Stiegler, Marjorie A Duh, Mei Sheng Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research PURPOSE: Triple therapy (TT; inhaled corticosteroid, long-acting muscarinic antagonist, and long-acting β(2)-agonist) is recommended for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at risk of exacerbation, although the optimum timing of TT initiation remains unclear. This study evaluated the impact of prompt versus delayed initiation of single-inhaler TT (fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol [FF/UMEC/VI]) following a COPD exacerbation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from the IQVIA PharMetrics(®) Plus database. Patients initiating FF/UMEC/VI following a COPD exacerbation between September 18, 2017 and September 30, 2019 (exacerbation = index date) were categorized as prompt (within 30 days of index) or delayed (31–180 days after index) FF/UMEC/VI initiators. Patients were aged ≥40 years at index, had ≥12 months’ continuous health insurance coverage before index (baseline), and ≥6 months’ coverage after index (follow-up). Patients with a COPD exacerbation or claim for FF/UMEC/VI during baseline were excluded. Inverse probability weighting was used to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics between cohorts. Exacerbations (overall, moderate, and severe), healthcare costs, and readmissions were evaluated during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 1904 patients (prompt: 529; delayed: 1375) were included. After weighting, baseline characteristics were well balanced between cohorts. Patients in the prompt cohort had significantly lower rates per person-year (PPY) of overall (0.98 vs 1.23; rate ratio [RR] [95% CI] = 0.79 [0.65–0.94], p = 0.004), moderate (0.86 vs 1.03; RR [95% CI] = 0.84 [0.69–0.99], p = 0.038), and severe (0.11 vs 0.20; RR [95% CI] = 0.57 [0.37–0.79], p = 0.002) exacerbations, compared with delayed initiators. Mean all-cause and COPD-related healthcare costs were significantly lower among prompt initiators (all-cause: $26,107 vs $32,400 PPY, p = 0.014; COPD-related: $12,694 vs $17,640 PPY, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Prompt initiation of FF/UMEC/VI following a moderate or severe COPD exacerbation was associated with significant reductions in exacerbations and healthcare costs relative to delayed initiation. Dove 2022-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8906822/ /pubmed/35281476 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S337668 Text en © 2022 Mannino et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mannino, David Bogart, Michael Germain, Guillaume Huang, Shirley P Ismaila, Afisi S Laliberté, François Jung, Young MacKnight, Sean D Stiegler, Marjorie A Duh, Mei Sheng Benefit of Prompt versus Delayed Use of Single-Inhaler Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) Following a COPD Exacerbation |
title | Benefit of Prompt versus Delayed Use of Single-Inhaler Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) Following a COPD Exacerbation |
title_full | Benefit of Prompt versus Delayed Use of Single-Inhaler Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) Following a COPD Exacerbation |
title_fullStr | Benefit of Prompt versus Delayed Use of Single-Inhaler Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) Following a COPD Exacerbation |
title_full_unstemmed | Benefit of Prompt versus Delayed Use of Single-Inhaler Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) Following a COPD Exacerbation |
title_short | Benefit of Prompt versus Delayed Use of Single-Inhaler Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) Following a COPD Exacerbation |
title_sort | benefit of prompt versus delayed use of single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (ff/umec/vi) following a copd exacerbation |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8906822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35281476 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S337668 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manninodavid benefitofpromptversusdelayeduseofsingleinhalerfluticasonefuroateumeclidiniumvilanterolffumecvifollowingacopdexacerbation AT bogartmichael benefitofpromptversusdelayeduseofsingleinhalerfluticasonefuroateumeclidiniumvilanterolffumecvifollowingacopdexacerbation AT germainguillaume benefitofpromptversusdelayeduseofsingleinhalerfluticasonefuroateumeclidiniumvilanterolffumecvifollowingacopdexacerbation AT huangshirleyp benefitofpromptversusdelayeduseofsingleinhalerfluticasonefuroateumeclidiniumvilanterolffumecvifollowingacopdexacerbation AT ismailaafisis benefitofpromptversusdelayeduseofsingleinhalerfluticasonefuroateumeclidiniumvilanterolffumecvifollowingacopdexacerbation AT lalibertefrancois benefitofpromptversusdelayeduseofsingleinhalerfluticasonefuroateumeclidiniumvilanterolffumecvifollowingacopdexacerbation AT jungyoung benefitofpromptversusdelayeduseofsingleinhalerfluticasonefuroateumeclidiniumvilanterolffumecvifollowingacopdexacerbation AT macknightseand benefitofpromptversusdelayeduseofsingleinhalerfluticasonefuroateumeclidiniumvilanterolffumecvifollowingacopdexacerbation AT stieglermarjoriea benefitofpromptversusdelayeduseofsingleinhalerfluticasonefuroateumeclidiniumvilanterolffumecvifollowingacopdexacerbation AT duhmeisheng benefitofpromptversusdelayeduseofsingleinhalerfluticasonefuroateumeclidiniumvilanterolffumecvifollowingacopdexacerbation |