Cargando…
Agile, Easily Applicable, and Useful eHealth Usability Evaluations: Systematic Review and Expert-Validation
Background Electronic health (eHealth) usability evaluations of rapidly developed eHealth systems are difficult to accomplish because traditional usability evaluation methods require substantial time in preparation and implementation. This illustrates the growing need for fast, flexible, and cost-e...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8906994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35263798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740919 |
_version_ | 1784665540279664640 |
---|---|
author | Sinabell, Irina Ammenwerth, Elske |
author_facet | Sinabell, Irina Ammenwerth, Elske |
author_sort | Sinabell, Irina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background Electronic health (eHealth) usability evaluations of rapidly developed eHealth systems are difficult to accomplish because traditional usability evaluation methods require substantial time in preparation and implementation. This illustrates the growing need for fast, flexible, and cost-effective methods to evaluate the usability of eHealth systems. To address this demand, the present study systematically identified and expert-validated rapidly deployable eHealth usability evaluation methods. Objective Identification and prioritization of eHealth usability evaluation methods suitable for agile, easily applicable, and useful eHealth usability evaluations. Methods The study design comprised a systematic iterative approach in which expert knowledge was contrasted with findings from literature. Forty-three eHealth usability evaluation methods were systematically identified and assessed regarding their ease of applicability and usefulness through semi-structured expert interviews with 10 European usability experts and systematic literature research. The most appropriate eHealth usability evaluation methods were selected stepwise based on the experts' judgements of their ease of applicability and usefulness. Results Of these 43 eHealth usability evaluation methods identified as suitable for agile, easily applicable, and useful eHealth usability evaluations, 10 were recommended by the experts based on their usefulness for rapid eHealth usability evaluations. The three most frequently recommended eHealth usability evaluation methods were Remote User Testing, Expert Review, and Rapid Iterative Test and Evaluation Method. Eleven usability evaluation methods, such as Retrospective Testing, were not recommended for use in rapid eHealth usability evaluations. Conclusion We conducted a systematic review and expert-validation to identify rapidly deployable eHealth usability evaluation methods. The comprehensive and evidence-based prioritization of eHealth usability evaluation methods supports faster usability evaluations, and so contributes to the ease-of-use of emerging eHealth systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8906994 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89069942022-03-10 Agile, Easily Applicable, and Useful eHealth Usability Evaluations: Systematic Review and Expert-Validation Sinabell, Irina Ammenwerth, Elske Appl Clin Inform Background Electronic health (eHealth) usability evaluations of rapidly developed eHealth systems are difficult to accomplish because traditional usability evaluation methods require substantial time in preparation and implementation. This illustrates the growing need for fast, flexible, and cost-effective methods to evaluate the usability of eHealth systems. To address this demand, the present study systematically identified and expert-validated rapidly deployable eHealth usability evaluation methods. Objective Identification and prioritization of eHealth usability evaluation methods suitable for agile, easily applicable, and useful eHealth usability evaluations. Methods The study design comprised a systematic iterative approach in which expert knowledge was contrasted with findings from literature. Forty-three eHealth usability evaluation methods were systematically identified and assessed regarding their ease of applicability and usefulness through semi-structured expert interviews with 10 European usability experts and systematic literature research. The most appropriate eHealth usability evaluation methods were selected stepwise based on the experts' judgements of their ease of applicability and usefulness. Results Of these 43 eHealth usability evaluation methods identified as suitable for agile, easily applicable, and useful eHealth usability evaluations, 10 were recommended by the experts based on their usefulness for rapid eHealth usability evaluations. The three most frequently recommended eHealth usability evaluation methods were Remote User Testing, Expert Review, and Rapid Iterative Test and Evaluation Method. Eleven usability evaluation methods, such as Retrospective Testing, were not recommended for use in rapid eHealth usability evaluations. Conclusion We conducted a systematic review and expert-validation to identify rapidly deployable eHealth usability evaluation methods. The comprehensive and evidence-based prioritization of eHealth usability evaluation methods supports faster usability evaluations, and so contributes to the ease-of-use of emerging eHealth systems. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8906994/ /pubmed/35263798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740919 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Sinabell, Irina Ammenwerth, Elske Agile, Easily Applicable, and Useful eHealth Usability Evaluations: Systematic Review and Expert-Validation |
title | Agile, Easily Applicable, and Useful eHealth Usability Evaluations: Systematic Review and Expert-Validation |
title_full | Agile, Easily Applicable, and Useful eHealth Usability Evaluations: Systematic Review and Expert-Validation |
title_fullStr | Agile, Easily Applicable, and Useful eHealth Usability Evaluations: Systematic Review and Expert-Validation |
title_full_unstemmed | Agile, Easily Applicable, and Useful eHealth Usability Evaluations: Systematic Review and Expert-Validation |
title_short | Agile, Easily Applicable, and Useful eHealth Usability Evaluations: Systematic Review and Expert-Validation |
title_sort | agile, easily applicable, and useful ehealth usability evaluations: systematic review and expert-validation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8906994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35263798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740919 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sinabellirina agileeasilyapplicableandusefulehealthusabilityevaluationssystematicreviewandexpertvalidation AT ammenwerthelske agileeasilyapplicableandusefulehealthusabilityevaluationssystematicreviewandexpertvalidation |