Cargando…

About the complexity of two-stage stochastic IPs

We consider so called 2-stage stochastic integer programs (IPs) and their generalized form, so called multi-stage stochastic IPs. A 2-stage stochastic IP is an integer program of the form [Formula: see text] where the constraint matrix [Formula: see text] consists roughly of n repetitions of a matri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Klein, Kim-Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8907148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35300153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10107-021-01698-z
Descripción
Sumario:We consider so called 2-stage stochastic integer programs (IPs) and their generalized form, so called multi-stage stochastic IPs. A 2-stage stochastic IP is an integer program of the form [Formula: see text] where the constraint matrix [Formula: see text] consists roughly of n repetitions of a matrix [Formula: see text] on the vertical line and n repetitions of a matrix [Formula: see text] on the diagonal. In this paper we improve upon an algorithmic result by Hemmecke and Schultz from 2003 [Hemmecke and Schultz, Math. Prog. 2003] to solve 2-stage stochastic IPs. The algorithm is based on the Graver augmentation framework where our main contribution is to give an explicit doubly exponential bound on the size of the augmenting steps. The previous bound for the size of the augmenting steps relied on non-constructive finiteness arguments from commutative algebra and therefore only an implicit bound was known that depends on parameters r, s, t and [Formula: see text] , where [Formula: see text] is the largest entry of the constraint matrix. Our new improved bound however is obtained by a novel theorem which argues about intersections of paths in a vector space. As a result of our new bound we obtain an algorithm to solve 2-stage stochastic IPs in time [Formula: see text] , where f is a doubly exponential function. To complement our result, we also prove a doubly exponential lower bound for the size of the augmenting steps.