Cargando…
Genic and non-genic SNP contributions to additive and dominance genetic effects in purebred and crossbred pig traits
The present research has estimated the additive and dominance genetic variances of genic and intergenic segments for average daily gain (ADG), backfat thickness (BFT) and pH of the semimembranosus dorsi muscle (PHS). Further, the predictive performance using additive and additive dominance models in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8907311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35264636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07767-3 |
_version_ | 1784665613744996352 |
---|---|
author | Mohammadpanah, Mahshid Ayatollahi Mehrgardi, Ahmad Gilbert, Hélène Larzul, Catherine Mercat, Marie-José Esmailizadeh, Ali Momen, Mehdi Tusell, Llibertat |
author_facet | Mohammadpanah, Mahshid Ayatollahi Mehrgardi, Ahmad Gilbert, Hélène Larzul, Catherine Mercat, Marie-José Esmailizadeh, Ali Momen, Mehdi Tusell, Llibertat |
author_sort | Mohammadpanah, Mahshid |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present research has estimated the additive and dominance genetic variances of genic and intergenic segments for average daily gain (ADG), backfat thickness (BFT) and pH of the semimembranosus dorsi muscle (PHS). Further, the predictive performance using additive and additive dominance models in a purebred Piétrain (PB) and a crossbred (Piétrain × Large White, CB) pig population was assessed. All genomic regions contributed equally to the additive and dominance genetic variations and lead to the same predictive ability that did not improve with the inclusion of dominance genetic effect and inbreeding in the models. Using all SNPs available, additive genotypic correlations between PB and CB performances for the three traits were high and positive (> 0.83) and dominance genotypic correlation was very inaccurate. Estimates of dominance genotypic correlations between all pairs of traits in both populations were imprecise but positive for ADG-BFT in CB and BFT-PHS in PB and CB with a high probability (> 0.98). Additive and dominance genotypic correlations between BFT and PHS were of different sign in both populations, which could indicate that genes contributing to the additive genetic progress in both traits would have an antagonistic effect when used for exploiting dominance effects in planned matings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8907311 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89073112022-03-11 Genic and non-genic SNP contributions to additive and dominance genetic effects in purebred and crossbred pig traits Mohammadpanah, Mahshid Ayatollahi Mehrgardi, Ahmad Gilbert, Hélène Larzul, Catherine Mercat, Marie-José Esmailizadeh, Ali Momen, Mehdi Tusell, Llibertat Sci Rep Article The present research has estimated the additive and dominance genetic variances of genic and intergenic segments for average daily gain (ADG), backfat thickness (BFT) and pH of the semimembranosus dorsi muscle (PHS). Further, the predictive performance using additive and additive dominance models in a purebred Piétrain (PB) and a crossbred (Piétrain × Large White, CB) pig population was assessed. All genomic regions contributed equally to the additive and dominance genetic variations and lead to the same predictive ability that did not improve with the inclusion of dominance genetic effect and inbreeding in the models. Using all SNPs available, additive genotypic correlations between PB and CB performances for the three traits were high and positive (> 0.83) and dominance genotypic correlation was very inaccurate. Estimates of dominance genotypic correlations between all pairs of traits in both populations were imprecise but positive for ADG-BFT in CB and BFT-PHS in PB and CB with a high probability (> 0.98). Additive and dominance genotypic correlations between BFT and PHS were of different sign in both populations, which could indicate that genes contributing to the additive genetic progress in both traits would have an antagonistic effect when used for exploiting dominance effects in planned matings. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8907311/ /pubmed/35264636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07767-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Mohammadpanah, Mahshid Ayatollahi Mehrgardi, Ahmad Gilbert, Hélène Larzul, Catherine Mercat, Marie-José Esmailizadeh, Ali Momen, Mehdi Tusell, Llibertat Genic and non-genic SNP contributions to additive and dominance genetic effects in purebred and crossbred pig traits |
title | Genic and non-genic SNP contributions to additive and dominance genetic effects in purebred and crossbred pig traits |
title_full | Genic and non-genic SNP contributions to additive and dominance genetic effects in purebred and crossbred pig traits |
title_fullStr | Genic and non-genic SNP contributions to additive and dominance genetic effects in purebred and crossbred pig traits |
title_full_unstemmed | Genic and non-genic SNP contributions to additive and dominance genetic effects in purebred and crossbred pig traits |
title_short | Genic and non-genic SNP contributions to additive and dominance genetic effects in purebred and crossbred pig traits |
title_sort | genic and non-genic snp contributions to additive and dominance genetic effects in purebred and crossbred pig traits |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8907311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35264636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07767-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohammadpanahmahshid genicandnongenicsnpcontributionstoadditiveanddominancegeneticeffectsinpurebredandcrossbredpigtraits AT ayatollahimehrgardiahmad genicandnongenicsnpcontributionstoadditiveanddominancegeneticeffectsinpurebredandcrossbredpigtraits AT gilberthelene genicandnongenicsnpcontributionstoadditiveanddominancegeneticeffectsinpurebredandcrossbredpigtraits AT larzulcatherine genicandnongenicsnpcontributionstoadditiveanddominancegeneticeffectsinpurebredandcrossbredpigtraits AT mercatmariejose genicandnongenicsnpcontributionstoadditiveanddominancegeneticeffectsinpurebredandcrossbredpigtraits AT esmailizadehali genicandnongenicsnpcontributionstoadditiveanddominancegeneticeffectsinpurebredandcrossbredpigtraits AT momenmehdi genicandnongenicsnpcontributionstoadditiveanddominancegeneticeffectsinpurebredandcrossbredpigtraits AT tusellllibertat genicandnongenicsnpcontributionstoadditiveanddominancegeneticeffectsinpurebredandcrossbredpigtraits |