Cargando…

Under or overpressure: an audit of endotracheal cuff pressure monitoring at the tertiary care center

BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation is a lifesaving intervention for critically ill patients but can produce the major complication of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Inappropriately inflated endotracheal tubes cause potential harm due to high or low pressure; this can be prevented through mon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Viswambharan, Biju, Kumari, Manjini Jeyaram, Krishnan, Gopala, Ramamoorthy, Lakshmi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8907457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34736298
http://dx.doi.org/10.4266/acc.2021.00024
_version_ 1784665647432597504
author Viswambharan, Biju
Kumari, Manjini Jeyaram
Krishnan, Gopala
Ramamoorthy, Lakshmi
author_facet Viswambharan, Biju
Kumari, Manjini Jeyaram
Krishnan, Gopala
Ramamoorthy, Lakshmi
author_sort Viswambharan, Biju
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation is a lifesaving intervention for critically ill patients but can produce the major complication of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Inappropriately inflated endotracheal tubes cause potential harm due to high or low pressure; this can be prevented through monitoring protocols. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 348 cuff pressure readings was performed with intubated and mechanically ventilated patients to evaluate the exact proportion of patients in intensive care units (ICUs) where the cuff pressure is optimal and to identify the ICUs where device-based monitoring is available to produce a lower proportion of sub-optimal cuff pressure cases. Every three days, cuff pressure was assessed with a handheld cuff pressure manometer. The corresponding VAP rates of those ICUs were obtained from the hospital infection control department. RESULTS: Cuff pressure of 40.2% was the lower cutoff for the high category, that of optimal was 35.3%, and the highest cutoff of sub-optimal was 24.4%. This study also showed ICUs that had cuff pressure monitoring devices and protocols. Active measurement protocols had a higher proportion of optimal cuff pressure (58.5%) and a lower proportion of sub-optimal and high cuff pressure (19.5% and 22.0%) compared to ICUs with no device-based monitoring protocols. Furthermore, the VAP rate of ICUs exhibited a weak positive correlation with sub-optimal cuff pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Device-based cuff pressure monitoring is essential in maintaining adequate cuff pressure but often is inadequate, resulting in high readings. Therefore, this study suggests that device-based cuff pressure monitoring be practiced.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8907457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89074572022-03-16 Under or overpressure: an audit of endotracheal cuff pressure monitoring at the tertiary care center Viswambharan, Biju Kumari, Manjini Jeyaram Krishnan, Gopala Ramamoorthy, Lakshmi Acute Crit Care Original Article BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation is a lifesaving intervention for critically ill patients but can produce the major complication of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Inappropriately inflated endotracheal tubes cause potential harm due to high or low pressure; this can be prevented through monitoring protocols. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 348 cuff pressure readings was performed with intubated and mechanically ventilated patients to evaluate the exact proportion of patients in intensive care units (ICUs) where the cuff pressure is optimal and to identify the ICUs where device-based monitoring is available to produce a lower proportion of sub-optimal cuff pressure cases. Every three days, cuff pressure was assessed with a handheld cuff pressure manometer. The corresponding VAP rates of those ICUs were obtained from the hospital infection control department. RESULTS: Cuff pressure of 40.2% was the lower cutoff for the high category, that of optimal was 35.3%, and the highest cutoff of sub-optimal was 24.4%. This study also showed ICUs that had cuff pressure monitoring devices and protocols. Active measurement protocols had a higher proportion of optimal cuff pressure (58.5%) and a lower proportion of sub-optimal and high cuff pressure (19.5% and 22.0%) compared to ICUs with no device-based monitoring protocols. Furthermore, the VAP rate of ICUs exhibited a weak positive correlation with sub-optimal cuff pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Device-based cuff pressure monitoring is essential in maintaining adequate cuff pressure but often is inadequate, resulting in high readings. Therefore, this study suggests that device-based cuff pressure monitoring be practiced. Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine 2021-11 2021-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8907457/ /pubmed/34736298 http://dx.doi.org/10.4266/acc.2021.00024 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Viswambharan, Biju
Kumari, Manjini Jeyaram
Krishnan, Gopala
Ramamoorthy, Lakshmi
Under or overpressure: an audit of endotracheal cuff pressure monitoring at the tertiary care center
title Under or overpressure: an audit of endotracheal cuff pressure monitoring at the tertiary care center
title_full Under or overpressure: an audit of endotracheal cuff pressure monitoring at the tertiary care center
title_fullStr Under or overpressure: an audit of endotracheal cuff pressure monitoring at the tertiary care center
title_full_unstemmed Under or overpressure: an audit of endotracheal cuff pressure monitoring at the tertiary care center
title_short Under or overpressure: an audit of endotracheal cuff pressure monitoring at the tertiary care center
title_sort under or overpressure: an audit of endotracheal cuff pressure monitoring at the tertiary care center
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8907457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34736298
http://dx.doi.org/10.4266/acc.2021.00024
work_keys_str_mv AT viswambharanbiju underoroverpressureanauditofendotrachealcuffpressuremonitoringatthetertiarycarecenter
AT kumarimanjinijeyaram underoroverpressureanauditofendotrachealcuffpressuremonitoringatthetertiarycarecenter
AT krishnangopala underoroverpressureanauditofendotrachealcuffpressuremonitoringatthetertiarycarecenter
AT ramamoorthylakshmi underoroverpressureanauditofendotrachealcuffpressuremonitoringatthetertiarycarecenter