Evaluation of the Prognostic Relevance of Differential Claudin Gene Expression Highlights Claudin-4 as Being Suppressed by TGFβ1 Inhibitor in Colorectal Cancer

Background: Claudins (CLDNs) are a family of closely related transmembrane proteins that have been linked to oncogenic transformation and metastasis across a range of cancers, suggesting that they may be valuable diagnostic and/or prognostic biomarkers that can be used to evaluate patient outcomes. However, CLDN expression patterns associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) remain to be defined. Methods: The mRNA levels of 21 different CLDN family genes were assessed across 20 tumor types using the Oncomine database. Correlations between these genes and patient clinical outcomes, immune cell infiltration, clinicopathological staging, lymph node metastasis, and mutational status were analyzed using the GEPIA, UALCAN, Human Protein Atlas, Tumor Immune Estimation Resource, STRING, Genenetwork, cBioportal, and DAVID databases in an effort to clarify the potential functional roles of different CLDN protein in CRC. Molecular docking analyses were used to probe potential interactions between CLDN4 and TGFβ1. Levels of CLDN4 and CLDN11 mRNA expression in clinical CRC patient samples and in the HT29 and HCT116 cell lines were assessed via qPCR. CLDN4 expression levels in these 2 cell lines were additionally assessed following TGFβ1 inhibitor treatment. Results: These analyses revealed that COAD and READ tissues exhibited the upregulation of CLDN1, CLDN2, CLDN3, CLDN4, CLDN7, and CLDN12 as well as the downregulation of CLDN5 and CLDN11 relative to control tissues. Higher CLDN11 and CLDN14 expression as well as lower CLDN23 mRNA levels were associated with poorer overall survival (OS) outcomes. Moreover, CLDN2 and CLDN3 or CLDN11 mRNA levels were significantly associated with lymph node metastatic progression in COAD or READ lower in COAD and READ tissues. A positive correlation between the expression of CLDN11 and predicted macrophage, dendritic cell, and CD4(+) T cell infiltration was identified in CRC, with CLDN12 expression further being positively correlated with CD4(+) T cell infiltration whereas a negative correlation was observed between such infiltration and the expression of CLDN3 and CLDN15. A positive correlation between CLDN1, CLDN16, and neutrophil infiltration was additionally detected, whereas neutrophil levels were negatively correlated with the expression of CLDN3 and CLDN15. Molecular docking suggested that CLDN4 was able to directly bind via hydrogen bond with TGFβ1. Relative to paracancerous tissues, clinical CRC tumor tissue samples exhibited CLDN4 and CLDN11 upregulation and downregulation, respectively. LY364947 was able to suppress the expression of CLDN4 in both the HT29 and HCT116 cell lines. Conclusion: Together, these results suggest that the expression of different CLDN family genes is closely associated with CRC tumor clinicopathological staging and immune cell infiltration. Moreover, CLDN4 expression is closely associated with TGFβ1 in CRC, suggesting that it and other CLDN family members may represent viable targets for antitumor therapeutic intervention.