Cargando…

Biomechanical study of extramedullary and intramedullary fixation in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric reversed-tilt fractures of the femur

BACKGROUND: To investigate the efficacy of the 135° hip screw, 95° intramedullary hip screw (IMHS) and 95° hip screw in the treatment of intertrochanteric reverse dip fracture of the femur. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 125 matched pairs of human femurs (median age 64 years) which were osteot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Guo-Liang, Li, Song-Jun, Li, Wen-Xue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8908151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35280356
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-93
_version_ 1784665814650060800
author Lu, Guo-Liang
Li, Song-Jun
Li, Wen-Xue
author_facet Lu, Guo-Liang
Li, Song-Jun
Li, Wen-Xue
author_sort Lu, Guo-Liang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To investigate the efficacy of the 135° hip screw, 95° intramedullary hip screw (IMHS) and 95° hip screw in the treatment of intertrochanteric reverse dip fracture of the femur. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 125 matched pairs of human femurs (median age 64 years) which were osteotomized at a 33° angle in the left femur and extended downward from the minor trochanter to simulate a reverse oblique intertrochanteric fracture. The right femur served as a control. The left femur (n=4) was implanted with a 135° hip screw, 95° hip screw, or IMHS. A strain detector was placed distal to the fracture site to monitor fragment strain. The lateral displacement of the proximal femur was measured by a linear variable differential transformer. An Instron tester measured stiffness, strain, and lateral displacement at 25° adduction, and 90° adduction with vertical loads on the femoral head. A 2 cm gap was then formed at the fracture site to simulate comminution and the mechanical test was repeated. RESULTS: Before the formation of the gap, there was no significant difference in stiffness among different bone structures (P>0.05), but after the formation of the gap, the stiffness of all the adduction structures decreased (P=0.03), and the difference in adduction was statistically significant (135° hip screw: 46.6%±3%; 95° hip screw: 22.9%±2%; IMHS: 53.7%±7.8%; P<0.05). Similar results were found for the abduction and buckling positions. There was no significant difference in the lateral displacement of the gap before (P=0.92) and after (P=0.26), but a significant difference in the failure load was found (135° hip screw: 1,222±560 N; 95° hip screw: 2,566±283 N; IMHS: 4,644±518 N; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference in stiffness among different structures (P>0.05). However, in the presence of gaps, IMHS bone implant structures are much stiffer than 135° and 95° structures and have a greater destructive load.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8908151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89081512022-03-11 Biomechanical study of extramedullary and intramedullary fixation in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric reversed-tilt fractures of the femur Lu, Guo-Liang Li, Song-Jun Li, Wen-Xue Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: To investigate the efficacy of the 135° hip screw, 95° intramedullary hip screw (IMHS) and 95° hip screw in the treatment of intertrochanteric reverse dip fracture of the femur. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 125 matched pairs of human femurs (median age 64 years) which were osteotomized at a 33° angle in the left femur and extended downward from the minor trochanter to simulate a reverse oblique intertrochanteric fracture. The right femur served as a control. The left femur (n=4) was implanted with a 135° hip screw, 95° hip screw, or IMHS. A strain detector was placed distal to the fracture site to monitor fragment strain. The lateral displacement of the proximal femur was measured by a linear variable differential transformer. An Instron tester measured stiffness, strain, and lateral displacement at 25° adduction, and 90° adduction with vertical loads on the femoral head. A 2 cm gap was then formed at the fracture site to simulate comminution and the mechanical test was repeated. RESULTS: Before the formation of the gap, there was no significant difference in stiffness among different bone structures (P>0.05), but after the formation of the gap, the stiffness of all the adduction structures decreased (P=0.03), and the difference in adduction was statistically significant (135° hip screw: 46.6%±3%; 95° hip screw: 22.9%±2%; IMHS: 53.7%±7.8%; P<0.05). Similar results were found for the abduction and buckling positions. There was no significant difference in the lateral displacement of the gap before (P=0.92) and after (P=0.26), but a significant difference in the failure load was found (135° hip screw: 1,222±560 N; 95° hip screw: 2,566±283 N; IMHS: 4,644±518 N; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference in stiffness among different structures (P>0.05). However, in the presence of gaps, IMHS bone implant structures are much stiffer than 135° and 95° structures and have a greater destructive load. AME Publishing Company 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8908151/ /pubmed/35280356 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-93 Text en 2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Lu, Guo-Liang
Li, Song-Jun
Li, Wen-Xue
Biomechanical study of extramedullary and intramedullary fixation in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric reversed-tilt fractures of the femur
title Biomechanical study of extramedullary and intramedullary fixation in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric reversed-tilt fractures of the femur
title_full Biomechanical study of extramedullary and intramedullary fixation in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric reversed-tilt fractures of the femur
title_fullStr Biomechanical study of extramedullary and intramedullary fixation in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric reversed-tilt fractures of the femur
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical study of extramedullary and intramedullary fixation in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric reversed-tilt fractures of the femur
title_short Biomechanical study of extramedullary and intramedullary fixation in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric reversed-tilt fractures of the femur
title_sort biomechanical study of extramedullary and intramedullary fixation in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric reversed-tilt fractures of the femur
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8908151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35280356
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-93
work_keys_str_mv AT luguoliang biomechanicalstudyofextramedullaryandintramedullaryfixationinthetreatmentofunstableintertrochantericreversedtiltfracturesofthefemur
AT lisongjun biomechanicalstudyofextramedullaryandintramedullaryfixationinthetreatmentofunstableintertrochantericreversedtiltfracturesofthefemur
AT liwenxue biomechanicalstudyofextramedullaryandintramedullaryfixationinthetreatmentofunstableintertrochantericreversedtiltfracturesofthefemur