Cargando…
Robust extraction of biological information from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging during radiotherapy using semi-automatic delineation
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance imaging (DWI) quantifies water mobility through the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC), a promising radiotherapy response biomarker. ADC measurements depend on manual delineation of a region of interest, a time-consuming and observer-de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8908275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35284662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.02.014 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance imaging (DWI) quantifies water mobility through the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC), a promising radiotherapy response biomarker. ADC measurements depend on manual delineation of a region of interest, a time-consuming and observer-dependent process. Here, the aim was to introduce and test the performance of a new, semi-automatic delineation tool (SADT) for ADC calculation within the viable region of the tumour. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with rectal cancer were scanned with DWI before radiotherapy (RT) (baseline) and two weeks into RT (week 2). The SADT was based on intensities in b=1100 s mm(−2) DWI and derived ADC maps. ADC values measured using the SADT and manual delineations were compared using Bland-Altman- and correlation analyses. Delineations were repeated to assess intra-observer variation, and repeatability was estimated using repeated DWI scans. RESULTS: ADC measured using the SADT and manual delineation showed strong and moderate correlation at baseline and week 2, respectively, with the SADT measuring systematically smaller values. Intra-observer ADC variation was slightly smaller for the SADT compared to manual delineation both at baseline, [−0.00; 0.03] vs. [−0.02; 0.04] 10(−3) mm(2) s(−1), and week 2, [−0.01; 0.00] vs. [−0.04; 0.07] 10(−3) mm(2) s(−1) (68.3% limits of agreement). The ADC change between baseline and week 2 was larger than the ADC uncertainty ([Formula: see text] 0.04 · 10(−3) mm(2) s(−1)) in all cases except one. CONCLUSION: The presented SADT showed performance comparable to manual expert delineation, and with sufficient consistency to allow extraction of potential biological information from the viable tumour. |
---|