Cargando…

Supportive supervision from a roving nurse mentor in a community health worker programme: a process evaluation in South Africa

BACKGROUND: Many low and middle- income countries (LMICs) are repositioning community health worker (CHW) programmes to provide a more comprehensive range of promotive and preventive services and referrals to the formal health service. However, insufficient supervision, fragmented programmes, and th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malatji, Hlologelo, Griffiths, Frances, Goudge, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8908295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35272666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07635-w
_version_ 1784665847892017152
author Malatji, Hlologelo
Griffiths, Frances
Goudge, Jane
author_facet Malatji, Hlologelo
Griffiths, Frances
Goudge, Jane
author_sort Malatji, Hlologelo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many low and middle- income countries (LMICs) are repositioning community health worker (CHW) programmes to provide a more comprehensive range of promotive and preventive services and referrals to the formal health service. However, insufficient supervision, fragmented programmes, and the low literacy levels of CHWs often result in the under-performance of the programmes. We evaluate the impact of a roving nurse mentor working with CHW teams proving supportive supervision in a semi-rural area of South Africa. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal process evaluation, using in-depth interviews, focus groups and observations prior to the intervention, during the intervention, and 6 months post-intervention to assess how the effects of the intervention were generated and sustained. Our participants were CHWs, their supervisors, clients and facility staff members and community representatives. RESULTS: The nurse mentor operated in an environment of resource shortages, conflicts between CHWs and facility staff, and an active CHW labour union. Over 15 months, the mentor was able to (1) support and train CHWs and their supervisors to gain and practice new skills, (2) address their fears of failing and (3) establish operational systems to address inefficiencies in the CHWs’ activities, resulting in improved service provision. Towards the end of the intervention the direct employment of the CHWs by the Department of Health and an increase in their stipend added to their motivation and integration into the local primary care clinic team. However, given the communities’ focus on accessing government housing, rather than better healthcare, and volatile nature of the communities, the nurse mentor was not able to establish a collaboration with local structures. CONCLUSIONS: A roving nurse mentor overseeing several CHW teams within a district healthcare system is a feasible option, particularly in a context where there is a shortage of qualified supervisors to support CHWs activities. A roving nurse mentor can contribute to the knowledge and skills development of the CHWs and enhance the capacity of junior supervisors. However, the long-term sustainability of the effects of intervention is dependent on CHWs’ formal employment by the Department of Health. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07635-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8908295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89082952022-03-10 Supportive supervision from a roving nurse mentor in a community health worker programme: a process evaluation in South Africa Malatji, Hlologelo Griffiths, Frances Goudge, Jane BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Many low and middle- income countries (LMICs) are repositioning community health worker (CHW) programmes to provide a more comprehensive range of promotive and preventive services and referrals to the formal health service. However, insufficient supervision, fragmented programmes, and the low literacy levels of CHWs often result in the under-performance of the programmes. We evaluate the impact of a roving nurse mentor working with CHW teams proving supportive supervision in a semi-rural area of South Africa. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal process evaluation, using in-depth interviews, focus groups and observations prior to the intervention, during the intervention, and 6 months post-intervention to assess how the effects of the intervention were generated and sustained. Our participants were CHWs, their supervisors, clients and facility staff members and community representatives. RESULTS: The nurse mentor operated in an environment of resource shortages, conflicts between CHWs and facility staff, and an active CHW labour union. Over 15 months, the mentor was able to (1) support and train CHWs and their supervisors to gain and practice new skills, (2) address their fears of failing and (3) establish operational systems to address inefficiencies in the CHWs’ activities, resulting in improved service provision. Towards the end of the intervention the direct employment of the CHWs by the Department of Health and an increase in their stipend added to their motivation and integration into the local primary care clinic team. However, given the communities’ focus on accessing government housing, rather than better healthcare, and volatile nature of the communities, the nurse mentor was not able to establish a collaboration with local structures. CONCLUSIONS: A roving nurse mentor overseeing several CHW teams within a district healthcare system is a feasible option, particularly in a context where there is a shortage of qualified supervisors to support CHWs activities. A roving nurse mentor can contribute to the knowledge and skills development of the CHWs and enhance the capacity of junior supervisors. However, the long-term sustainability of the effects of intervention is dependent on CHWs’ formal employment by the Department of Health. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07635-w. BioMed Central 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8908295/ /pubmed/35272666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07635-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Malatji, Hlologelo
Griffiths, Frances
Goudge, Jane
Supportive supervision from a roving nurse mentor in a community health worker programme: a process evaluation in South Africa
title Supportive supervision from a roving nurse mentor in a community health worker programme: a process evaluation in South Africa
title_full Supportive supervision from a roving nurse mentor in a community health worker programme: a process evaluation in South Africa
title_fullStr Supportive supervision from a roving nurse mentor in a community health worker programme: a process evaluation in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Supportive supervision from a roving nurse mentor in a community health worker programme: a process evaluation in South Africa
title_short Supportive supervision from a roving nurse mentor in a community health worker programme: a process evaluation in South Africa
title_sort supportive supervision from a roving nurse mentor in a community health worker programme: a process evaluation in south africa
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8908295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35272666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07635-w
work_keys_str_mv AT malatjihlologelo supportivesupervisionfromarovingnursementorinacommunityhealthworkerprogrammeaprocessevaluationinsouthafrica
AT griffithsfrances supportivesupervisionfromarovingnursementorinacommunityhealthworkerprogrammeaprocessevaluationinsouthafrica
AT goudgejane supportivesupervisionfromarovingnursementorinacommunityhealthworkerprogrammeaprocessevaluationinsouthafrica