Cargando…

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Arthroscopic Inlay Bristow Surgery With Screw Versus Suture Button Fixation: A Comparative Study of 117 Patients With 3.3-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND: Some studies have advocated the use of suture button fixation during Bristow-Latarjet surgery to reduce complications associated with screw fixation. However, data comparing these fixation methods are relatively incomplete. PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of modified arthroscopic Br...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Qingfa, Zhang, Shuhan, Cheng, Xu, Xiao, Jian, Lin, Lin, Liu, Qiang, Shao, Zhenxing, Cui, Guoqing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8908399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35284584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221076048
_version_ 1784665870342029312
author Song, Qingfa
Zhang, Shuhan
Cheng, Xu
Xiao, Jian
Lin, Lin
Liu, Qiang
Shao, Zhenxing
Cui, Guoqing
author_facet Song, Qingfa
Zhang, Shuhan
Cheng, Xu
Xiao, Jian
Lin, Lin
Liu, Qiang
Shao, Zhenxing
Cui, Guoqing
author_sort Song, Qingfa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Some studies have advocated the use of suture button fixation during Bristow-Latarjet surgery to reduce complications associated with screw fixation. However, data comparing these fixation methods are relatively incomplete. PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of modified arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet surgery and compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes using screw versus suture button fixation. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We evaluated 136 patients with traumatic anterior shoulder instability who underwent the modified arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet surgery between June 2015 and February 2018. Of these patients, 117 who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled at a mean follow-up of 3.3 ± 0.7 years. Shoulders were separated into 2 groups based on fixation technique: screw fixation (group A; n = 63) or suture button fixation (group B; n = 54). Computed tomography imaging findings and clinical results were assessed preoperatively; immediately after operation; and postoperatively at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and final follow-up. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of postoperative clinical scores, the level of return to sports, range of motion, graft position, or reoperation rates. Bone healing was observed in 97.4% of the cases overall (114/117), with 98.4% bone union in group A and 96.3% in group B at final follow-up. Bone absorption was more common in group A (n = 30; 47.6%) compared with group B (n = 10; 18.5%) (P = .003). There were no hardware-related complications in group B, compared with 7.9% of patients in group A (P = .034). One patient in group B had a recurrent dislocation due to an unexpected event, and there were no recurrent dislocations in group A. CONCLUSION: After the modified arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet procedure, both suture button and screw fixation methods demonstrated high bony healing rates and low risk of recurrence. Less coracoid graft resorption and no hardware-related complications were seen with suture button fixation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8908399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89083992022-03-11 Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Arthroscopic Inlay Bristow Surgery With Screw Versus Suture Button Fixation: A Comparative Study of 117 Patients With 3.3-Year Follow-up Song, Qingfa Zhang, Shuhan Cheng, Xu Xiao, Jian Lin, Lin Liu, Qiang Shao, Zhenxing Cui, Guoqing Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Some studies have advocated the use of suture button fixation during Bristow-Latarjet surgery to reduce complications associated with screw fixation. However, data comparing these fixation methods are relatively incomplete. PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of modified arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet surgery and compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes using screw versus suture button fixation. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We evaluated 136 patients with traumatic anterior shoulder instability who underwent the modified arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet surgery between June 2015 and February 2018. Of these patients, 117 who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled at a mean follow-up of 3.3 ± 0.7 years. Shoulders were separated into 2 groups based on fixation technique: screw fixation (group A; n = 63) or suture button fixation (group B; n = 54). Computed tomography imaging findings and clinical results were assessed preoperatively; immediately after operation; and postoperatively at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and final follow-up. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of postoperative clinical scores, the level of return to sports, range of motion, graft position, or reoperation rates. Bone healing was observed in 97.4% of the cases overall (114/117), with 98.4% bone union in group A and 96.3% in group B at final follow-up. Bone absorption was more common in group A (n = 30; 47.6%) compared with group B (n = 10; 18.5%) (P = .003). There were no hardware-related complications in group B, compared with 7.9% of patients in group A (P = .034). One patient in group B had a recurrent dislocation due to an unexpected event, and there were no recurrent dislocations in group A. CONCLUSION: After the modified arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet procedure, both suture button and screw fixation methods demonstrated high bony healing rates and low risk of recurrence. Less coracoid graft resorption and no hardware-related complications were seen with suture button fixation. SAGE Publications 2022-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8908399/ /pubmed/35284584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221076048 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Song, Qingfa
Zhang, Shuhan
Cheng, Xu
Xiao, Jian
Lin, Lin
Liu, Qiang
Shao, Zhenxing
Cui, Guoqing
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Arthroscopic Inlay Bristow Surgery With Screw Versus Suture Button Fixation: A Comparative Study of 117 Patients With 3.3-Year Follow-up
title Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Arthroscopic Inlay Bristow Surgery With Screw Versus Suture Button Fixation: A Comparative Study of 117 Patients With 3.3-Year Follow-up
title_full Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Arthroscopic Inlay Bristow Surgery With Screw Versus Suture Button Fixation: A Comparative Study of 117 Patients With 3.3-Year Follow-up
title_fullStr Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Arthroscopic Inlay Bristow Surgery With Screw Versus Suture Button Fixation: A Comparative Study of 117 Patients With 3.3-Year Follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Arthroscopic Inlay Bristow Surgery With Screw Versus Suture Button Fixation: A Comparative Study of 117 Patients With 3.3-Year Follow-up
title_short Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Arthroscopic Inlay Bristow Surgery With Screw Versus Suture Button Fixation: A Comparative Study of 117 Patients With 3.3-Year Follow-up
title_sort clinical and radiographic outcomes after arthroscopic inlay bristow surgery with screw versus suture button fixation: a comparative study of 117 patients with 3.3-year follow-up
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8908399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35284584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221076048
work_keys_str_mv AT songqingfa clinicalandradiographicoutcomesafterarthroscopicinlaybristowsurgerywithscrewversussuturebuttonfixationacomparativestudyof117patientswith33yearfollowup
AT zhangshuhan clinicalandradiographicoutcomesafterarthroscopicinlaybristowsurgerywithscrewversussuturebuttonfixationacomparativestudyof117patientswith33yearfollowup
AT chengxu clinicalandradiographicoutcomesafterarthroscopicinlaybristowsurgerywithscrewversussuturebuttonfixationacomparativestudyof117patientswith33yearfollowup
AT xiaojian clinicalandradiographicoutcomesafterarthroscopicinlaybristowsurgerywithscrewversussuturebuttonfixationacomparativestudyof117patientswith33yearfollowup
AT linlin clinicalandradiographicoutcomesafterarthroscopicinlaybristowsurgerywithscrewversussuturebuttonfixationacomparativestudyof117patientswith33yearfollowup
AT liuqiang clinicalandradiographicoutcomesafterarthroscopicinlaybristowsurgerywithscrewversussuturebuttonfixationacomparativestudyof117patientswith33yearfollowup
AT shaozhenxing clinicalandradiographicoutcomesafterarthroscopicinlaybristowsurgerywithscrewversussuturebuttonfixationacomparativestudyof117patientswith33yearfollowup
AT cuiguoqing clinicalandradiographicoutcomesafterarthroscopicinlaybristowsurgerywithscrewversussuturebuttonfixationacomparativestudyof117patientswith33yearfollowup