Cargando…
Feedback in an Epidemic?
Undergraduates and postgraduates frequently receive feedback on their clinical and non-clinical performance and progression throughout their studies and career. Good quality feedback has been shown to improve trainees’ confidence and performance. This article discusses the benefits of feedback and r...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8908454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35282511 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22008 |
_version_ | 1784665881072107520 |
---|---|
author | Taha, Amr |
author_facet | Taha, Amr |
author_sort | Taha, Amr |
collection | PubMed |
description | Undergraduates and postgraduates frequently receive feedback on their clinical and non-clinical performance and progression throughout their studies and career. Good quality feedback has been shown to improve trainees’ confidence and performance. This article discusses the benefits of feedback and reviews the communication, technical, financial, and networking barriers to feedback introduced by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and its impact on the quality of medical and dental education in the UK, followed by a critical reflection. In addition, it reviews the pros and cons of self-assessment of clinical learning, and it provides an overview of the most widely accepted feedback models: Pendleton’s rules, SET-GO method, agenda-led, outcome-based analysis (ALOBA) model and Prepare to Ask-Discuss-Ask-Plan Together (Prepare to ADAPT) on the quality of feedback received. The aim is to identify the most suitable feedback method to help trainees with their clinical and professional development during the COVID-19 pandemic and any possible pandemics in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8908454 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89084542022-03-11 Feedback in an Epidemic? Taha, Amr Cureus Medical Education Undergraduates and postgraduates frequently receive feedback on their clinical and non-clinical performance and progression throughout their studies and career. Good quality feedback has been shown to improve trainees’ confidence and performance. This article discusses the benefits of feedback and reviews the communication, technical, financial, and networking barriers to feedback introduced by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and its impact on the quality of medical and dental education in the UK, followed by a critical reflection. In addition, it reviews the pros and cons of self-assessment of clinical learning, and it provides an overview of the most widely accepted feedback models: Pendleton’s rules, SET-GO method, agenda-led, outcome-based analysis (ALOBA) model and Prepare to Ask-Discuss-Ask-Plan Together (Prepare to ADAPT) on the quality of feedback received. The aim is to identify the most suitable feedback method to help trainees with their clinical and professional development during the COVID-19 pandemic and any possible pandemics in the future. Cureus 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8908454/ /pubmed/35282511 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22008 Text en Copyright © 2022, Taha et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Medical Education Taha, Amr Feedback in an Epidemic? |
title | Feedback in an Epidemic? |
title_full | Feedback in an Epidemic? |
title_fullStr | Feedback in an Epidemic? |
title_full_unstemmed | Feedback in an Epidemic? |
title_short | Feedback in an Epidemic? |
title_sort | feedback in an epidemic? |
topic | Medical Education |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8908454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35282511 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tahaamr feedbackinanepidemic |