Cargando…

Collaborative learning in small groups in an online course – a case study

BACKGROUND: The ability to learn collaboratively and work in teams is an essential competency in both educational and healthcare settings, and collaborative student activities are acknowledged as being an important part of the pedagogical approach in higher education and teaching. The course that wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haugland, Mildrid Jorunn, Rosenberg, Ivar, Aasekjær, Katrine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8908554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35272639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03232-x
_version_ 1784665900845105152
author Haugland, Mildrid Jorunn
Rosenberg, Ivar
Aasekjær, Katrine
author_facet Haugland, Mildrid Jorunn
Rosenberg, Ivar
Aasekjær, Katrine
author_sort Haugland, Mildrid Jorunn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ability to learn collaboratively and work in teams is an essential competency in both educational and healthcare settings, and collaborative student activities are acknowledged as being an important part of the pedagogical approach in higher education and teaching. The course that was the focus of this research, a 15-ECTS-credit online course in philosophy of science, ethics, and research methods, was offered online as part of 11 master’s-level health programmes at a university in Norway. Collaborative learning in combination with digital teaching tools was the preferred pedagogical approach in the online course. The aim of the study was to describe, explore and discuss how the students collaborated in small groups in an online course to learn. METHODS: We performed six focus groups and 13 individual interviews from February 2018 to May 2019, conducting a qualitative case study with a content analysis of the data collected. The participants were master students in the same faculty at a university in Norway. All the included participants had fulfilled the 15 ECTS credit course. RESULTS: Our study revealed that the collaboration in small groups resulted in three different working processes, depending on the students’ ability to be flexible and take responsibility for their own and common learning. The three different working processes that emerged from our data were 1. joint responsibility – flexible organization; 2. individual responsibility – flexible organization; and 3. individual responsibility – unorganized. None of the groups changed their working process during their course, even though some experienced their strategy as inadequate. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that despite similar factors such as context, assignments and student autonomy, the students chose different collaboration strategies to accomplish the online course learning objectives. Each group chose their own working process, but only the strategy 1. joint responsibility – flexible organization seemed to promote collaboration, discussion, and team work to complete the complex assignments in the online course. The result from our study may be helpful in designing and planning future online courses; hence online learning requires a focus on how students collaborate and learn online, to gain knowledge and understanding through group discussion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8908554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89085542022-03-18 Collaborative learning in small groups in an online course – a case study Haugland, Mildrid Jorunn Rosenberg, Ivar Aasekjær, Katrine BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: The ability to learn collaboratively and work in teams is an essential competency in both educational and healthcare settings, and collaborative student activities are acknowledged as being an important part of the pedagogical approach in higher education and teaching. The course that was the focus of this research, a 15-ECTS-credit online course in philosophy of science, ethics, and research methods, was offered online as part of 11 master’s-level health programmes at a university in Norway. Collaborative learning in combination with digital teaching tools was the preferred pedagogical approach in the online course. The aim of the study was to describe, explore and discuss how the students collaborated in small groups in an online course to learn. METHODS: We performed six focus groups and 13 individual interviews from February 2018 to May 2019, conducting a qualitative case study with a content analysis of the data collected. The participants were master students in the same faculty at a university in Norway. All the included participants had fulfilled the 15 ECTS credit course. RESULTS: Our study revealed that the collaboration in small groups resulted in three different working processes, depending on the students’ ability to be flexible and take responsibility for their own and common learning. The three different working processes that emerged from our data were 1. joint responsibility – flexible organization; 2. individual responsibility – flexible organization; and 3. individual responsibility – unorganized. None of the groups changed their working process during their course, even though some experienced their strategy as inadequate. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that despite similar factors such as context, assignments and student autonomy, the students chose different collaboration strategies to accomplish the online course learning objectives. Each group chose their own working process, but only the strategy 1. joint responsibility – flexible organization seemed to promote collaboration, discussion, and team work to complete the complex assignments in the online course. The result from our study may be helpful in designing and planning future online courses; hence online learning requires a focus on how students collaborate and learn online, to gain knowledge and understanding through group discussion. BioMed Central 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8908554/ /pubmed/35272639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03232-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Haugland, Mildrid Jorunn
Rosenberg, Ivar
Aasekjær, Katrine
Collaborative learning in small groups in an online course – a case study
title Collaborative learning in small groups in an online course – a case study
title_full Collaborative learning in small groups in an online course – a case study
title_fullStr Collaborative learning in small groups in an online course – a case study
title_full_unstemmed Collaborative learning in small groups in an online course – a case study
title_short Collaborative learning in small groups in an online course – a case study
title_sort collaborative learning in small groups in an online course – a case study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8908554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35272639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03232-x
work_keys_str_mv AT hauglandmildridjorunn collaborativelearninginsmallgroupsinanonlinecourseacasestudy
AT rosenbergivar collaborativelearninginsmallgroupsinanonlinecourseacasestudy
AT aasekjærkatrine collaborativelearninginsmallgroupsinanonlinecourseacasestudy