Cargando…
Precision measurement of cardiac structure and function in cardiovascular magnetic resonance using machine learning
BACKGROUND: Measurement of cardiac structure and function from images (e.g. volumes, mass and derived parameters such as left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction [LVEF]) guides care for millions. This is best assessed using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), but image analysis is currently perf...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8908603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35272664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-022-00846-4 |
_version_ | 1784665911510171648 |
---|---|
author | Davies, Rhodri H. Augusto, João B. Bhuva, Anish Xue, Hui Treibel, Thomas A. Ye, Yang Hughes, Rebecca K. Bai, Wenjia Lau, Clement Shiwani, Hunain Fontana, Marianna Kozor, Rebecca Herrey, Anna Lopes, Luis R. Maestrini, Viviana Rosmini, Stefania Petersen, Steffen E. Kellman, Peter Rueckert, Daniel Greenwood, John P. Captur, Gabriella Manisty, Charlotte Schelbert, Erik Moon, James C. |
author_facet | Davies, Rhodri H. Augusto, João B. Bhuva, Anish Xue, Hui Treibel, Thomas A. Ye, Yang Hughes, Rebecca K. Bai, Wenjia Lau, Clement Shiwani, Hunain Fontana, Marianna Kozor, Rebecca Herrey, Anna Lopes, Luis R. Maestrini, Viviana Rosmini, Stefania Petersen, Steffen E. Kellman, Peter Rueckert, Daniel Greenwood, John P. Captur, Gabriella Manisty, Charlotte Schelbert, Erik Moon, James C. |
author_sort | Davies, Rhodri H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Measurement of cardiac structure and function from images (e.g. volumes, mass and derived parameters such as left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction [LVEF]) guides care for millions. This is best assessed using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), but image analysis is currently performed by individual clinicians, which introduces error. We sought to develop a machine learning algorithm for volumetric analysis of CMR images with demonstrably better precision than human analysis. METHODS: A fully automated machine learning algorithm was trained on 1923 scans (10 scanner models, 13 institutions, 9 clinical conditions, 60,000 contours) and used to segment the LV blood volume and myocardium. Performance was quantified by measuring precision on an independent multi-site validation dataset with multiple pathologies with n = 109 patients, scanned twice. This dataset was augmented with a further 1277 patients scanned as part of routine clinical care to allow qualitative assessment of generalization ability by identifying mis-segmentations. Machine learning algorithm (‘machine’) performance was compared to three clinicians (‘human’) and a commercial tool (cvi42, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging). FINDINGS: Machine analysis was quicker (20 s per patient) than human (13 min). Overall machine mis-segmentation rate was 1 in 479 images for the combined dataset, occurring mostly in rare pathologies not encountered in training. Without correcting these mis-segmentations, machine analysis had superior precision to three clinicians (e.g. scan-rescan coefficients of variation of human vs machine: LVEF 6.0% vs 4.2%, LV mass 4.8% vs. 3.6%; both P < 0.05), translating to a 46% reduction in required trial sample size using an LVEF endpoint. CONCLUSION: We present a fully automated algorithm for measuring LV structure and global systolic function that betters human performance for speed and precision. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12968-022-00846-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8908603 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89086032022-03-18 Precision measurement of cardiac structure and function in cardiovascular magnetic resonance using machine learning Davies, Rhodri H. Augusto, João B. Bhuva, Anish Xue, Hui Treibel, Thomas A. Ye, Yang Hughes, Rebecca K. Bai, Wenjia Lau, Clement Shiwani, Hunain Fontana, Marianna Kozor, Rebecca Herrey, Anna Lopes, Luis R. Maestrini, Viviana Rosmini, Stefania Petersen, Steffen E. Kellman, Peter Rueckert, Daniel Greenwood, John P. Captur, Gabriella Manisty, Charlotte Schelbert, Erik Moon, James C. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Measurement of cardiac structure and function from images (e.g. volumes, mass and derived parameters such as left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction [LVEF]) guides care for millions. This is best assessed using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), but image analysis is currently performed by individual clinicians, which introduces error. We sought to develop a machine learning algorithm for volumetric analysis of CMR images with demonstrably better precision than human analysis. METHODS: A fully automated machine learning algorithm was trained on 1923 scans (10 scanner models, 13 institutions, 9 clinical conditions, 60,000 contours) and used to segment the LV blood volume and myocardium. Performance was quantified by measuring precision on an independent multi-site validation dataset with multiple pathologies with n = 109 patients, scanned twice. This dataset was augmented with a further 1277 patients scanned as part of routine clinical care to allow qualitative assessment of generalization ability by identifying mis-segmentations. Machine learning algorithm (‘machine’) performance was compared to three clinicians (‘human’) and a commercial tool (cvi42, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging). FINDINGS: Machine analysis was quicker (20 s per patient) than human (13 min). Overall machine mis-segmentation rate was 1 in 479 images for the combined dataset, occurring mostly in rare pathologies not encountered in training. Without correcting these mis-segmentations, machine analysis had superior precision to three clinicians (e.g. scan-rescan coefficients of variation of human vs machine: LVEF 6.0% vs 4.2%, LV mass 4.8% vs. 3.6%; both P < 0.05), translating to a 46% reduction in required trial sample size using an LVEF endpoint. CONCLUSION: We present a fully automated algorithm for measuring LV structure and global systolic function that betters human performance for speed and precision. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12968-022-00846-4. BioMed Central 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8908603/ /pubmed/35272664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-022-00846-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Davies, Rhodri H. Augusto, João B. Bhuva, Anish Xue, Hui Treibel, Thomas A. Ye, Yang Hughes, Rebecca K. Bai, Wenjia Lau, Clement Shiwani, Hunain Fontana, Marianna Kozor, Rebecca Herrey, Anna Lopes, Luis R. Maestrini, Viviana Rosmini, Stefania Petersen, Steffen E. Kellman, Peter Rueckert, Daniel Greenwood, John P. Captur, Gabriella Manisty, Charlotte Schelbert, Erik Moon, James C. Precision measurement of cardiac structure and function in cardiovascular magnetic resonance using machine learning |
title | Precision measurement of cardiac structure and function in cardiovascular magnetic resonance using machine learning |
title_full | Precision measurement of cardiac structure and function in cardiovascular magnetic resonance using machine learning |
title_fullStr | Precision measurement of cardiac structure and function in cardiovascular magnetic resonance using machine learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Precision measurement of cardiac structure and function in cardiovascular magnetic resonance using machine learning |
title_short | Precision measurement of cardiac structure and function in cardiovascular magnetic resonance using machine learning |
title_sort | precision measurement of cardiac structure and function in cardiovascular magnetic resonance using machine learning |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8908603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35272664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-022-00846-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daviesrhodrih precisionmeasurementofcardiacstructureandfunctionincardiovascularmagneticresonanceusingmachinelearning AT augustojoaob precisionmeasurementofcardiacstructureandfunctionincardiovascularmagneticresonanceusingmachinelearning AT bhuvaanish precisionmeasurementofcardiacstructureandfunctionincardiovascularmagneticresonanceusingmachinelearning AT xuehui precisionmeasurementofcardiacstructureandfunctionincardiovascularmagneticresonanceusingmachinelearning AT treibelthomasa precisionmeasurementofcardiacstructureandfunctionincardiovascularmagneticresonanceusingmachinelearning AT yeyang precisionmeasurementofcardiacstructureandfunctionincardiovascularmagneticresonanceusingmachinelearning AT hughesrebeccak precisionmeasurementofcardiacstructureandfunctionincardiovascularmagneticresonanceusingmachinelearning AT baiwenjia precisionmeasurementofcardiacstructureandfunctionincardiovascularmagneticresonanceusingmachinelearning AT lauclement precisionmeasurementofcardiacstructureandfunctionincardiovascularmagneticresonanceusingmachinelearning AT shiwanihunain precisionmeasurementofcardiacstructureandfunctionincardiovascularmagneticresonanceusingmachinelearning AT fontanamarianna precisionmeasurementofcardiacstructureandfunctionincardiovascularmagneticresonanceusingmachinelearning AT kozorrebecca precisionmeasurementofcardiacstructureandfunctionincardiovascularmagneticresonanceusingmachinelearning AT herreyanna precisionmeasurementofcardiacstructureandfunctionincardiovascularmagneticresonanceusingmachinelearning AT lopesluisr precisionmeasurementofcardiacstructureandfunctionincardiovascularmagneticresonanceusingmachinelearning AT maestriniviviana precisionmeasurementofcardiacstructureandfunctionincardiovascularmagneticresonanceusingmachinelearning AT rosministefania precisionmeasurementofcardiacstructureandfunctionincardiovascularmagneticresonanceusingmachinelearning AT petersensteffene precisionmeasurementofcardiacstructureandfunctionincardiovascularmagneticresonanceusingmachinelearning AT kellmanpeter precisionmeasurementofcardiacstructureandfunctionincardiovascularmagneticresonanceusingmachinelearning AT rueckertdaniel precisionmeasurementofcardiacstructureandfunctionincardiovascularmagneticresonanceusingmachinelearning AT greenwoodjohnp precisionmeasurementofcardiacstructureandfunctionincardiovascularmagneticresonanceusingmachinelearning AT capturgabriella precisionmeasurementofcardiacstructureandfunctionincardiovascularmagneticresonanceusingmachinelearning AT manistycharlotte precisionmeasurementofcardiacstructureandfunctionincardiovascularmagneticresonanceusingmachinelearning AT schelberterik precisionmeasurementofcardiacstructureandfunctionincardiovascularmagneticresonanceusingmachinelearning AT moonjamesc precisionmeasurementofcardiacstructureandfunctionincardiovascularmagneticresonanceusingmachinelearning |