Cargando…

Good validity in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register: assessment of data quality for key variables in primary and revision cruciate ligament reconstructions from 2004 to 2013

BACKGROUND: The Norwegian Knee Ligament Register was founded in 2004 to provide representative and reliable data on cruciate ligament surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of key variables in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register to reveal and prevent systematic errors or incomp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Midttun, Espen, Andersen, Morten Torheim, Engebretsen, Lars, Visnes, Håvard, Fenstad, Anne Marie, Gjertsen, Jan-Erik, Persson, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8908681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35264137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05183-2
_version_ 1784665926893830144
author Midttun, Espen
Andersen, Morten Torheim
Engebretsen, Lars
Visnes, Håvard
Fenstad, Anne Marie
Gjertsen, Jan-Erik
Persson, Andreas
author_facet Midttun, Espen
Andersen, Morten Torheim
Engebretsen, Lars
Visnes, Håvard
Fenstad, Anne Marie
Gjertsen, Jan-Erik
Persson, Andreas
author_sort Midttun, Espen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Norwegian Knee Ligament Register was founded in 2004 to provide representative and reliable data on cruciate ligament surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of key variables in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register to reveal and prevent systematic errors or incompleteness, which can lead to biased reports and study conclusions. METHOD: We included a stratified cluster sample of 83 patients that had undergone both primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery. A total of 166 medical records were reviewed and compared with their corresponding data in the database of the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register. We assessed the validity of a selection of key variables using medical records as a reference standard to compute the positive predictive values of the register data for the variables. RESULTS: The positive predictive values for the variables of primary and revision surgery ranged from 92 to 100% and from 39 to 100% with a mean positive predictive value of 99% and 88% respectively. Data on intraoperative findings and surgical details had high positive predictive values, ranging from 91 to 100% for both primary and revision surgery. The positive predictive value for the variable “date of injury” was 92% for primary surgeries but only 39% for revision surgeries. The positive predictive value for “activity at the time of injury” was 99% for primary surgeries and 52% for revisions. CONCLUSION: Overall, the data quality of the key variables examined in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register was high, making the register a valid source for research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05183-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8908681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89086812022-03-18 Good validity in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register: assessment of data quality for key variables in primary and revision cruciate ligament reconstructions from 2004 to 2013 Midttun, Espen Andersen, Morten Torheim Engebretsen, Lars Visnes, Håvard Fenstad, Anne Marie Gjertsen, Jan-Erik Persson, Andreas BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: The Norwegian Knee Ligament Register was founded in 2004 to provide representative and reliable data on cruciate ligament surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of key variables in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register to reveal and prevent systematic errors or incompleteness, which can lead to biased reports and study conclusions. METHOD: We included a stratified cluster sample of 83 patients that had undergone both primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery. A total of 166 medical records were reviewed and compared with their corresponding data in the database of the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register. We assessed the validity of a selection of key variables using medical records as a reference standard to compute the positive predictive values of the register data for the variables. RESULTS: The positive predictive values for the variables of primary and revision surgery ranged from 92 to 100% and from 39 to 100% with a mean positive predictive value of 99% and 88% respectively. Data on intraoperative findings and surgical details had high positive predictive values, ranging from 91 to 100% for both primary and revision surgery. The positive predictive value for the variable “date of injury” was 92% for primary surgeries but only 39% for revision surgeries. The positive predictive value for “activity at the time of injury” was 99% for primary surgeries and 52% for revisions. CONCLUSION: Overall, the data quality of the key variables examined in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register was high, making the register a valid source for research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05183-2. BioMed Central 2022-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8908681/ /pubmed/35264137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05183-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Midttun, Espen
Andersen, Morten Torheim
Engebretsen, Lars
Visnes, Håvard
Fenstad, Anne Marie
Gjertsen, Jan-Erik
Persson, Andreas
Good validity in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register: assessment of data quality for key variables in primary and revision cruciate ligament reconstructions from 2004 to 2013
title Good validity in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register: assessment of data quality for key variables in primary and revision cruciate ligament reconstructions from 2004 to 2013
title_full Good validity in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register: assessment of data quality for key variables in primary and revision cruciate ligament reconstructions from 2004 to 2013
title_fullStr Good validity in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register: assessment of data quality for key variables in primary and revision cruciate ligament reconstructions from 2004 to 2013
title_full_unstemmed Good validity in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register: assessment of data quality for key variables in primary and revision cruciate ligament reconstructions from 2004 to 2013
title_short Good validity in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register: assessment of data quality for key variables in primary and revision cruciate ligament reconstructions from 2004 to 2013
title_sort good validity in the norwegian knee ligament register: assessment of data quality for key variables in primary and revision cruciate ligament reconstructions from 2004 to 2013
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8908681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35264137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05183-2
work_keys_str_mv AT midttunespen goodvalidityinthenorwegiankneeligamentregisterassessmentofdataqualityforkeyvariablesinprimaryandrevisioncruciateligamentreconstructionsfrom2004to2013
AT andersenmortentorheim goodvalidityinthenorwegiankneeligamentregisterassessmentofdataqualityforkeyvariablesinprimaryandrevisioncruciateligamentreconstructionsfrom2004to2013
AT engebretsenlars goodvalidityinthenorwegiankneeligamentregisterassessmentofdataqualityforkeyvariablesinprimaryandrevisioncruciateligamentreconstructionsfrom2004to2013
AT visneshavard goodvalidityinthenorwegiankneeligamentregisterassessmentofdataqualityforkeyvariablesinprimaryandrevisioncruciateligamentreconstructionsfrom2004to2013
AT fenstadannemarie goodvalidityinthenorwegiankneeligamentregisterassessmentofdataqualityforkeyvariablesinprimaryandrevisioncruciateligamentreconstructionsfrom2004to2013
AT gjertsenjanerik goodvalidityinthenorwegiankneeligamentregisterassessmentofdataqualityforkeyvariablesinprimaryandrevisioncruciateligamentreconstructionsfrom2004to2013
AT perssonandreas goodvalidityinthenorwegiankneeligamentregisterassessmentofdataqualityforkeyvariablesinprimaryandrevisioncruciateligamentreconstructionsfrom2004to2013