Cargando…
Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Vaccine after Recovery from Covid-19
BACKGROUND: The risk of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) decreases substantially among patients who have recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). However, it is unknown how long protective immunity lasts. Current guidelines recommend vaccination...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Massachusetts Medical Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8908846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2119497 |
_version_ | 1784665962672291840 |
---|---|
author | Hammerman, Ariel Sergienko, Ruslan Friger, Michael Beckenstein, Tanya Peretz, Alon Netzer, Doron Yaron, Shlomit Arbel, Ronen |
author_facet | Hammerman, Ariel Sergienko, Ruslan Friger, Michael Beckenstein, Tanya Peretz, Alon Netzer, Doron Yaron, Shlomit Arbel, Ronen |
author_sort | Hammerman, Ariel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The risk of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) decreases substantially among patients who have recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). However, it is unknown how long protective immunity lasts. Current guidelines recommend vaccination of recovered patients even though data regarding vaccine effectiveness in such cases are still limited. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed electronic medical records from a large health care organization in Israel to assess reinfection rates in patients who had recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection before any vaccination against Covid-19. We compared reinfection rates among patients who had subsequently received the BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer–BioNTech) and those who had not been vaccinated between March 1 and November 26, 2021. We used a Cox proportional-hazards regression model with time-dependent covariates to estimate the association between vaccination and reinfection after adjustment for demographic factors and coexisting illnesses. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated as 1 minus the hazard ratio. In a secondary analysis, we evaluated the vaccine effectiveness of one dose as compared with two doses. RESULTS: A total of 149,032 patients who had recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection met the eligibility criteria. Of these patients, 83,356 (56%) received subsequent vaccination during the 270-day study period. Reinfection occurred in 354 of the vaccinated patients (2.46 cases per 100,000 persons per day) and in 2168 of 65,676 unvaccinated patients (10.21 cases per 100,000 persons per day). Vaccine effectiveness was estimated at 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80 to 84) among patients who were 16 to 64 years of age and 60% (95% CI, 36 to 76) among those 65 years of age or older. No significant difference in vaccine effectiveness was found for one dose as compared with two doses. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who had recovered from Covid-19, the receipt of at least one dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine was associated with a significantly lower risk of recurrent infection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8908846 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Massachusetts Medical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89088462022-03-21 Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Vaccine after Recovery from Covid-19 Hammerman, Ariel Sergienko, Ruslan Friger, Michael Beckenstein, Tanya Peretz, Alon Netzer, Doron Yaron, Shlomit Arbel, Ronen N Engl J Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The risk of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) decreases substantially among patients who have recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). However, it is unknown how long protective immunity lasts. Current guidelines recommend vaccination of recovered patients even though data regarding vaccine effectiveness in such cases are still limited. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed electronic medical records from a large health care organization in Israel to assess reinfection rates in patients who had recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection before any vaccination against Covid-19. We compared reinfection rates among patients who had subsequently received the BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer–BioNTech) and those who had not been vaccinated between March 1 and November 26, 2021. We used a Cox proportional-hazards regression model with time-dependent covariates to estimate the association between vaccination and reinfection after adjustment for demographic factors and coexisting illnesses. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated as 1 minus the hazard ratio. In a secondary analysis, we evaluated the vaccine effectiveness of one dose as compared with two doses. RESULTS: A total of 149,032 patients who had recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection met the eligibility criteria. Of these patients, 83,356 (56%) received subsequent vaccination during the 270-day study period. Reinfection occurred in 354 of the vaccinated patients (2.46 cases per 100,000 persons per day) and in 2168 of 65,676 unvaccinated patients (10.21 cases per 100,000 persons per day). Vaccine effectiveness was estimated at 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80 to 84) among patients who were 16 to 64 years of age and 60% (95% CI, 36 to 76) among those 65 years of age or older. No significant difference in vaccine effectiveness was found for one dose as compared with two doses. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who had recovered from Covid-19, the receipt of at least one dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine was associated with a significantly lower risk of recurrent infection. Massachusetts Medical Society 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8908846/ /pubmed/35172072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2119497 Text en Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use, except commercial resale, and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgment of the original source. PMC is granted a license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, subject to existing copyright protections. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hammerman, Ariel Sergienko, Ruslan Friger, Michael Beckenstein, Tanya Peretz, Alon Netzer, Doron Yaron, Shlomit Arbel, Ronen Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Vaccine after Recovery from Covid-19 |
title | Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Vaccine after Recovery from Covid-19 |
title_full | Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Vaccine after Recovery from Covid-19 |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Vaccine after Recovery from Covid-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Vaccine after Recovery from Covid-19 |
title_short | Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Vaccine after Recovery from Covid-19 |
title_sort | effectiveness of the bnt162b2 vaccine after recovery from covid-19 |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8908846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2119497 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hammermanariel effectivenessofthebnt162b2vaccineafterrecoveryfromcovid19 AT sergienkoruslan effectivenessofthebnt162b2vaccineafterrecoveryfromcovid19 AT frigermichael effectivenessofthebnt162b2vaccineafterrecoveryfromcovid19 AT beckensteintanya effectivenessofthebnt162b2vaccineafterrecoveryfromcovid19 AT peretzalon effectivenessofthebnt162b2vaccineafterrecoveryfromcovid19 AT netzerdoron effectivenessofthebnt162b2vaccineafterrecoveryfromcovid19 AT yaronshlomit effectivenessofthebnt162b2vaccineafterrecoveryfromcovid19 AT arbelronen effectivenessofthebnt162b2vaccineafterrecoveryfromcovid19 |