Cargando…

Linking Signal Relevancy and Intensity in Predictive Tactile Suppression

Predictable somatosensory feedback leads to a reduction in tactile sensitivity. This phenomenon, called tactile suppression, relies on a mechanism that uses an efference copy of motor commands to help select relevant aspects of incoming sensory signals. We investigated whether tactile suppression is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beyvers, Marie C., Fraser, Lindsey E., Fiehler, Katja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8908965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35280202
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.795886
_version_ 1784665991202996224
author Beyvers, Marie C.
Fraser, Lindsey E.
Fiehler, Katja
author_facet Beyvers, Marie C.
Fraser, Lindsey E.
Fiehler, Katja
author_sort Beyvers, Marie C.
collection PubMed
description Predictable somatosensory feedback leads to a reduction in tactile sensitivity. This phenomenon, called tactile suppression, relies on a mechanism that uses an efference copy of motor commands to help select relevant aspects of incoming sensory signals. We investigated whether tactile suppression is modulated by (a) the task-relevancy of the predicted consequences of movement and (b) the intensity of related somatosensory feedback signals. Participants reached to a target region in the air in front of a screen; visual or tactile feedback indicated the reach was successful. Furthermore, tactile feedback intensity (strong vs. weak) varied across two groups of participants. We measured tactile suppression by comparing detection thresholds for a probing vibration applied to the finger either early or late during reach and at rest. As expected, we found an overall decrease in late-reach suppression, as no touch was involved at the end of the reach. We observed an increase in the degree of tactile suppression when strong tactile feedback was given at the end of the reach, compared to when weak tactile feedback or visual feedback was given. Our results suggest that the extent of tactile suppression can be adapted to different demands of somatosensory processing. Downregulation of this mechanism is invoked only when the consequences of missing a weak movement sequence are severe for the task. The decisive factor for the presence of tactile suppression seems not to be the predicted action effect as such, but the need to detect and process anticipated feedback signals occurring during movement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8908965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89089652022-03-11 Linking Signal Relevancy and Intensity in Predictive Tactile Suppression Beyvers, Marie C. Fraser, Lindsey E. Fiehler, Katja Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Predictable somatosensory feedback leads to a reduction in tactile sensitivity. This phenomenon, called tactile suppression, relies on a mechanism that uses an efference copy of motor commands to help select relevant aspects of incoming sensory signals. We investigated whether tactile suppression is modulated by (a) the task-relevancy of the predicted consequences of movement and (b) the intensity of related somatosensory feedback signals. Participants reached to a target region in the air in front of a screen; visual or tactile feedback indicated the reach was successful. Furthermore, tactile feedback intensity (strong vs. weak) varied across two groups of participants. We measured tactile suppression by comparing detection thresholds for a probing vibration applied to the finger either early or late during reach and at rest. As expected, we found an overall decrease in late-reach suppression, as no touch was involved at the end of the reach. We observed an increase in the degree of tactile suppression when strong tactile feedback was given at the end of the reach, compared to when weak tactile feedback or visual feedback was given. Our results suggest that the extent of tactile suppression can be adapted to different demands of somatosensory processing. Downregulation of this mechanism is invoked only when the consequences of missing a weak movement sequence are severe for the task. The decisive factor for the presence of tactile suppression seems not to be the predicted action effect as such, but the need to detect and process anticipated feedback signals occurring during movement. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8908965/ /pubmed/35280202 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.795886 Text en Copyright © 2022 Beyvers, Fraser and Fiehler. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Beyvers, Marie C.
Fraser, Lindsey E.
Fiehler, Katja
Linking Signal Relevancy and Intensity in Predictive Tactile Suppression
title Linking Signal Relevancy and Intensity in Predictive Tactile Suppression
title_full Linking Signal Relevancy and Intensity in Predictive Tactile Suppression
title_fullStr Linking Signal Relevancy and Intensity in Predictive Tactile Suppression
title_full_unstemmed Linking Signal Relevancy and Intensity in Predictive Tactile Suppression
title_short Linking Signal Relevancy and Intensity in Predictive Tactile Suppression
title_sort linking signal relevancy and intensity in predictive tactile suppression
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8908965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35280202
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.795886
work_keys_str_mv AT beyversmariec linkingsignalrelevancyandintensityinpredictivetactilesuppression
AT fraserlindseye linkingsignalrelevancyandintensityinpredictivetactilesuppression
AT fiehlerkatja linkingsignalrelevancyandintensityinpredictivetactilesuppression