Proton Radiation Therapy for Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients: Dosimetric and NTCP Evaluation Supporting Clinical Decision

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Radiotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer, in different settings with or without chemotherapy. This role has been recently strengthened by the introduction of proton therapy, as a radiation treatment option for head and neck cancer, obtaining improved plans with a reduced dose to organs-at-risk. Definition of strategies to identify patients who would benefit the most from proton therapy in terms of reduced toxicity is highly desirable, due to limited availability and higher costs of this treatment option. Two parallel working pipelines were depicted in this study for nasopharyngeal cancer patients. The introduction of a synthetic index describing the overall expected reduction in toxicities in the head and neck region with proton therapy was supported by the application of the well-established model-based selection methodology, relative to the same patient cohort. Based on this analysis, the fraction of nasopharyngeal cancer patients expected to receive a benefit with proton therapy was in line with the Dutch experience for the head and neck cancer population. ABSTRACT: (1) Background: we proposed an integrated strategy to support clinical allocation of nasopharyngeal patients between proton and photon radiotherapy. (2) Methods: intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans were optimized for 50 consecutive nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and differences in dose and normal tissue complication probability (ΔNTCPx-p) for 16 models were calculated. Patient eligibility for IMPT was assessed using a model-based selection (MBS) strategy following the results for 7/16 models describing the most clinically relevant endpoints, applying a model-specific ΔNTCPx-p threshold (15% to 5% depending on the severity of the complication) and a composite threshold (35%). In addition, a comprehensive toxicity score (CTS) was defined as the weighted sum of all 16 ΔNTCPx-p, where weights follow a clinical rationale. (3) Results: Dose deviations were in favor of IMPT (ΔD(mean) ≥ 14% for cord, esophagus, brainstem, and glottic larynx). The risk of toxicity significantly decreased for xerostomia (−12.5%), brain necrosis (−2.3%), mucositis (−3.2%), tinnitus (−8.6%), hypothyroidism (−9.3%), and trismus (−5.4%). There were 40% of the patients that resulted as eligible for IMPT, with a greater advantage for T3–T4 staging. Significantly different CTS were observed in patients qualifying for IMPT. (4) Conclusions: The MBS strategy successfully drives the clinical identification of NPC patients, who are most likely to benefit from IMPT. CTS summarizes well the expected global gain.